URGENT NOTICE!!!!

Do YOU think that YOU were used as a “research” patient for Daniel’s studies?
You better ask him as if you weren’t, who was??
If patients were not told that they were part of a “study and research” of a surgery, that is as “unethical” in Germany as it is here in the USA and must be reported!!
To report an HONcode compliance violation:
http://debussy.hon.ch/cgibin/Complain/complain2.pl?HONConduct964263++++next
(3) Again quoting Daniel..
“ And I am sure that we need another 15 years of research and clinical data to show which technique might be better.”
IHRT says: NOW Daniel tells us!!!

Comment on adhesion formation by using carbon dioxide gas .....
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=4U7gYqeTYs7RGZDtQw1oDgY40m&forum=2&thread=873

SUCCESS RATES OF SURGERY, an excurs, by Daniel Kruschinski.....
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=4U7gYqeTYs7RGZDtQw1oDgY40m&forum=2&thread=275

Surgery with carbondioxide and SprayGel might be USELESS too...
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=4U7gYqeTYs7RGZDtQw1oDgY40m&forum=2&thread=1221

First of all, please look at Shirlis biochemical explanation here:
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=NiLgCvS6sifDMo475pIa4jsuLF&forum=21&thread=898

 IHRT asks why Daniel portrayed the “gasless” surgery as already having been “researched” and having “statistical” data behind it! (Above)

 NOW he tells us that things are not quite what he portrayed them to be?


 Daniel used the above information to promote HIS gasless surgery, yet some of these are “miss-represented” to reflect what Daniel wants them to reflect! IHRT knows this as we have the “actual” reports to compare how Daniel used them!


 Again, we see his wife’s “research” as being the only one dealing with any contradictions with the CO2 issue and peritoneal tissue. (More on that to come)


 Patients traveled to Endogyn believed in this stuff…who could have known!!?


 If it will take 15 years “of research and clinical data to show which technique might be better” which patients HAVE been and WILL be used for these studies for his “research”?

 Are the surgeries with the Abdolift “experimental?”


 DID Daniel tell any of his patients that his adhesiolysis procedure is NOT tested as to whether it could offer anything better then any other adhesiolysis!


 He IS telling them that NOW!


 Who were the “tests cases” Daniel uses for the “statistics” used in his upcoming book? (And that Abdolift is portrayed as such…

 If your all of a suddenly ill from reading this, better go to the FBI & FTC to get your money back!!