ARD, CAPPS, Adhesions and Adhesion Related Disorder , Internal Scar Tissue, Hope for those who suffer from Adhesions

Thursday, March 02, 2006

The German Patent office

Here is the german patent office.
http://www.dpma.de/index.htm
Search all you want as Daniel has invented nothing but a trap for adhesion sufferers.
Search for inventor Kruschinski or the alternative spelling of his name he uses,
D. Kruczynski.

Daniels duped us again! He never in print says he invented gasless laparoscopy but lets YOU say it to others.......

If I am wrong please shown me! Validation Please!

I found these guys.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Title: US5415160: Surgical lift method and apparatus
[ Derwent Title ]


Country: US United States of America


Inventor: Ortiz, Mark S.; Milford, OH
Failla, Stephen J.; Cincinnati, OH
Kinet, Jean-Pierre; Ulzburg, Germany
Marie, Frederic; Guise, France


Assignee: Ethicon, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
other patents from ETHICON, INC. (182890) (approx. 1,064)
News, Profiles, Stocks and More about this company


Published / Filed: 1995-05-16 / 1994-03-15


Application Number: US1994000213145


IPC Code: Advanced: A61B 17/02; A61B 17/30; A61B 17/34; A61B 17/44;
Core: A61B 17/42; more...
IPC-7: A61B 17/02;


ECLA Code: A61B17/02L; A61B17/44B;


U.S. Class: Current: 600/230; 005/624; 606/115; 606/149;
Original: 128/020; 606/149; 606/115; 005/624;


Field of Search: 606/219,215,216,119,149 294/64.1,64.3,65,1.1 604/115,186,180 128/020,30.2


Priority Number: 1994-03-15 US1994000213145

Abstract: A method and apparatus for lifting an abdominal wall during laparoscopic diagnostic and surgical procedures. The surgical lift device includes a gripping portion for contacting and holding an external skin surface adjacent the abdominal wall. The gripping portion is selectively detachable from the skin surface. The device further includes a lifting portion that extends outwardly from the gripping portion. In accordance with alternative embodiments, the gripping portion may comprise an adhesive sheet or a suction member and the lifting portion may comprise a wire member or a portion of a hook and loop-type fastener.

http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=US05415160__ registration required!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

And these guys

Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:1238-41.


[Initial experiences with the modular retraction system (VarioLift) for laparoscopic surgery without pneumoperitoneum]

[Article in German]

Gutt CN, Daume JM, Paolucci V, Encke A.

Klinik fur Allgemeinchirurgie, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universitat, Frankfurt am Main.

The VarioLift system is an alternative method for abdominal wall lifting to create sufficient intra-abdominal space and adequate laparoscopic exposure to the operating field. The installation of a CO2 pneumoperitoneum is not necessary, which means that technical disadvantages, systemic and local physiological effects, or complications related to gas insufflation are not relevant when this method is used. The surgeon is allowed to combine the advantages of endoscopic surgery, such as magnified video-endoscopic visualisation, with well-known open surgical techniques to create a symbiosis of prove methods.

PMID: 9574389 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Surg Endosc. 1997 Aug;11(8):868-74. Related Articles, Links


Systems and instruments for laparoscopic surgery without pneumoperitoneum.

Gutt CN, Daume J, Schaeff B, Paolucci V.

Department of General Surgery, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

The insufflation of carbon dioxide into the peritoneal cavity is a routine technique of abdominal exposure in laparoscopic surgery. Because of adverse physiological effects and technical disadvantages of the pneumoperitoneum, alternative methods of abdominal wall lifting have been explored recently. Two groups of retraction systems exist: intraabdominal lifting and subcutaneous lifting of the abdominal wall. Some systems require additional pneumoperitoneum, because the extent of intraabdominal exposure is not sufficient. Other systems are working completely without gas insufflation. Two systems combine abdominal wall lifting with pressure on the internal organs. Every method allows the use of standard laparoscopic instruments, which originally were designed for a regular pneumoperitoneum. The use of a low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in combination with mechanical augmentation of the peritoneal cavity reduces physiological disadvantages of laparoscopy. But technical advantages, such as combination of laparoscopic and open techniques, can be realized only without gas insufflation. Conventional instruments have been designed to fit the ergonomical needs of isopneumic laparoscopy and to be employed with simple valveless cannulae.

PMID: 9266655 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

No comments: