Persons afflicted with ARD

Karen is now moving into her "2nd" phase of behaviors that are consistent with her retaliatory efforts when anyone questions anything about Daniel.

We will now see Karen inciting others to post against IHRT and sing praises for Daniel in her attempts to keep Daniel from having to answer questions posed to him regarding issues at Endogyn. We will see Karen's attempts to put the focus of recent issues about Endogyn and the surgery being performed there, and make it a "Bev & Dawn" issue about "competing" for the best surgeon type thing!
Bev and Dawn do not care what surgeon a persons goes to for an adhesiolysis, what we do care about if that patients secure honest answers and ethical presentations of the adhesiolysis procedure they are seeking...so the issues in IHRT are not about who goes to whom for a surgery, they are about the adhesiolysis procedure gone wrong in Endogyn and the unethical behaviors coming out of Endogyn!
(Please read through the IHRT material regarding Endogyn.)


Posted Monday, March 6, 2006 @ 11:35 PM
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=8YJhDRgIKVbfPK2FQ4GsOFHA4V&forum=2&thread=2259

IHRT would like to draw attention to this recent post in Endogyn by Lynn, a former patient of Daniels.
Though we are sure some patients did get well following an adhesiolysis at Endogyn, based on his own words, and pictures in his web site, 10% of his patients are returning for multiple surgeries due to the "Abdo-Lift!"
Persons afflicted with ARD secure improvements from adhesiolysis from many different surgeons, and many of those are in the USA, so claming a "success" by someone afflicted with ARD is always worth celebrating, and we would love to hear from more of Daniels patients who remain well after a year!

IHRT will consider that Lynn's results are what she claims them to be, however, she is a friend of Karen's, and by Lynn's own words, Karen contacted her to post against "Bev and Dawn" when Lynn knew nothing of the current issues being addressed in IHRT.

The sad thing about a post such as Lynn's, is that it is obvious that Lynn has not formularized herself with the issues surrounding IHRT's concerns regarding adhesiolysis at Endogyn when she states, "I have no idea why these two individuals continue to try and discredit a doctor who has helped so many women from all over the world." If Lynn has no idea as to the issues presented in IHRT, what is she basing her opinions on?? Lynn is simply parroting Karen's words here, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that Lynn has been encited to anger at Dawn and Bev, by her "friend"Karen Stewart, as niether Dawn or Bev has ever had any association with her for her to make such comments about them. Why would Lynn make such accusations? Has she ever heard Dawn or Bev doing such a thing? The truth here is that Karen recruited Lynn to post in an attempt to show cause FOR Daniel, rather then Daniel answering questions posed to him. Shame on you Lynn! A grown women allowing herself to be used by Karen in such a way!


IHRT asks Lynn to share her opinion on the "3rd look pictures" and "lack of information on 2nd look procedures" now being shared on Endogyn."
We also ask Lynn's opinion on Daniel's mocking of "Jesus" on the Endogyn web site.
We also ask Lynn if she can name some of those whom she has taken the liberty to speak for when she states that "most of the women" (in her comment here "If you would like to know, most of the women that have been helped by Dr. Kruschinski are out in the world enjoying life again." ) as it sounds like she is keeping contact with them.
Lynn, if you are able to communicate with them, why are they not posting for Daniel? IHRT does have a *list of over 150 + patients to Endogyn from 2003 - 2006" so we definately would recognize them if they posted. ( *IHRT will post them to the public as soon as we can. ( IHRT is making some contacts regarding this list and the results of those contacts will also be made public!)
You have to be carefull when stating that you are speaking for Daniels patients, and that most of his patients are now well, when Daniel cannot produce statistics on that, you say that you can as you know the surgical outcomes of most of his patients and that they are ARE well. Please share how you know this information.
Lynn, if you are posting Karen's words in an attempt to harvest patients to a surgery in which the surgeon himself states he cannot cure" them, is absolutely wrong and deceiving! No one gets the results that Daniel claims he gets from his surgeries, or at least that he used to get!

Now Lynn, to acclimate you to some of the reasons IHRT is concerned about things in Endogyn, we would like your opinion regarding the following issues, and in YOUR own words,please. This would help us better understand the issues at Endogyn that do concern us. In this way, you would be helping other patients make an informed decision because they understand better if they hear things from a patients perspective.

Lynn, what is your impression of the "3rd" look procedure as the reason Daniel offers that?
What is your impression of the pictures of adhesions that the "Abdolift" creates?
Would you have any second thoughts if you would have seen this information prior to you going to Endogyn?
If you would still go, what would you have based your decision on if you were not concerned about getting adhesions from the lift, and that you might have to make multiple trips to Endogyn? And concerns about those issues?
Lynn, do you know if these women are eating as well as Daniel claims in the Endogyn web site they will be eating after an adhesiolysis with him?
Lynn, what percent of Daniel's patients are "most" and are saying that they are all cured?
Where did you get this information, please?
Lynn, do you know why Daniel is NOT sharing information regarding the results of "2nd" look procedures when he used to tell it all?(Claimimg 100% adhesion free, over and over again!)
Lynn, though you are well following an adhesiolysis with Daniel, do you think it is fair for others to ask question regarding Daniels adhesiolysis and other things regarding Endogyn, or do you think people should just go to Daniel, no questions asked, because your well? What are your thoughts on this please?
Lynn, your words here are commendable, however, do you intend to just help "Karen and Daniel" advertise Endogyn, or do you intend to help other ARD patients make an informed decision about coming to Endogyn? Is this about "Karen" or what?? I don't understand these words, Lynn. Can you clarify them please? (Lynn's words: I will try to do more to help both Karen and Dr. Kru in any way possible!!!)
Lynn, what precipitated these words from you? (Lynn's words:"unless they were getting some kind of reward ) Have you ever communicated with Bev or Dawn? Have you ever seen "Dawn & Bev" exhibiting these behaviors? If so, please share where and when you personally have experienced what you accuse them of doing to secure "rewards."? (What would that "reward" be..just curious)
Lynn, when you state that you are speaking for Daniel's patients, and that most of his patients are now well, if Daniel cannot produce statistics on them, can you present them? You ARE stating that you know most of his patients ARE well. Please share how you know this information.
IHRT looks forward to hearing your response to our questions, as we know that you want to do everything possible to help Karen and Daniel, and by answering these concerns, in your own words as a former patient of Daniels, maybe you will put some of IHRT's issues to rest once and for all!


Lynn
Unregistered

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted Monday, March 6, 2006 @ 11:35 PM

I have no idea why these two individuals continue to try and discredit a doctor who has helped so many women from all over the world. I just don't know why someone would be so cruel unless they were getting some kind of reward for their slander. If you would like to know, most of the women that have been helped by Dr. Kruschinski are out in the world enjoying life again. Unfortunately, we have not been around to let everyone know how good we are feeling. It is not because we are still sick and in horrible pain, it is because we are ENJOYING OUR LIFE. I am sad to say that I have not been on line so I was unaware of what was being said about the one doctor that took the time to listen to me and help me. I should be like Karen spreading the word but I was too busy living.
I have personally met Karen and her daughter, Melissa. I can't believe someone could accuse her of not going through pain because she did not actually have the adhesions herself. If you are a parent, then you would know that you would much rather have the disease yourself instead of seeing your daughter suffer for 14 years and not be able to do anything about it. If it had not been for Karen and her determination, her daughter would probably have most of her abdominal organs removed and never be able to have a baby. She was told by several doctors in the U.S. that she would never be able to have children. WELL, THEY WERE WRONG!!!!!!! THANKS TO DR. KRUSCHINSKI, SHE IS PAIN FREE AND HAS A BABY!!!!!!

Fortunately, Karen is a strong woman. Otherwise, these so called people who accuse her and Dr. Kru of wrong doings would have silenced her. Thank God for Karen, and I will try to do more to help both Karen and Dr. Kru in any way possible!!!

For those of you (and you know who you are) that are trying to fill everyone's head with hatred and slander, go somewhere else!!!!!!! Why don't you just talk back and forth to each other via email so you can be miserable together and not upset other people who are really trying to help.

Lynn

http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=8YJhDRgIKVbfPK2FQ4GsOFHA4V&forum=2&thread=2259