Doc_Kru
Most advanced
Messages
Posted Friday, March 17, 2006 @ 10:12 AM
Adhesions.de Message Board
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=8amsd3jlR1URVx26nrWI6AHMmR&forum=2&thread=2275http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=8amsd3jlR1URVx26nrWI6AHMmR&forum=2&thread=2275
IHRT quotes Daniel…(IHRT will number the statement and our corresponding reply to it!)
(1)There is no technique better than the other as only long term results and follow-up can show the success of a technique. On the other hand the same successfull technique in one surgeon’s hand might show only moderate results in other surgeon’s hand.
(2) With my friend Harry Reich, we have very frequent fruitful discussions
about gas and gasless surgery.
(3) And I am sure that we need another 15 years of research and clinical data to
show which technique might be better.
(4)But in the end THE SURGEON is the key, regardless, which technique is used. Important is also the infrastructure that is offered for adhesion patients and the cooperation and interaction between patients and surgeon. The patients can rely that EACH surgeon does his best for the patient.
(5)There are only very few good surgeons for adhesions, but even the best surgeon won’t reach a 100 % success.
(6) Five years experience with SprayGel and Lift-laparoscopy (gasless) and a 2nd look laparoscopy, sometimes 3rd look gives so much material and clinical data, that patients can rely on the quality of surgery and infrastructure. And patients can choose a surgeon and a technique.
(7) Sometimes we can combine techniques (gas and gasless), if Harry Reich is here, which in the near future will be more often as he has recognized the high quality of organisation and infrastructure at EndoGyn.
(8) Just 2 days ago we finalized a more close cooperation to provide patients with a high quality of surgery and techniques.”
Let’s work together to find more and better options for ARD patients ! We (the surgeons) ARE doing it.
We aim to extensively evaluate and discuss and question our techniques, the experimental / research studies and understand the adhesion prevention barriers.
All this will throw much light on the optimal management of the enigmatic condition of ARD.
YOU (All patients) should join us in this mission!
(IHRT reads between the lines, “YOU (All patients) should join us in this mission: To support ONLY me and ask no questions while you do that!!”)
With warm regards
IHRT Chapter THREE of: The ever changing world of Endogyn!!" Endogyn, Emma KliniK, Frankfurt,
(2) Quoting Daniel…
“With my friend Harry Reich, we have very frequent fruitful discussions about gas and gasless surgery.”
A) All one has to do to know that “frequent” is false is to contact Dr. Reich and ask how often he and Daniel “ have discussions about gas and gasless surgery.” We are certain you will be surprised at the “frequency” of such conversations!
B) Try contacting Dr. Reich via this email to ask your questions of him, ask how often he has performed surgery at Endogyn and see who gets your messages.. mailto:Harry.Reich@endogyn.com
Harry.Reich@endogyn.com
C) Reich has done 4 adhesiolysis procedures at Endogyn in the past 3 years! And
they were with CO2..Daniel why did you allow this at Endogyn if you are so
protective of your patients who come there for adhesiolysis? (All patients were adhesion free one year later as seen in a follow-up surgery here in the USA!)
D ) When is Reich coming back, Daniel?
E.) When was the last time Dr. Reich (or any of your “team”) performed a surgery at
Endogyn?
F.) Why do you have other surgeons at Endogyn if they do a CO2 surgery?
G.) Are you not opposed to a CO2 surgery?
H) To quote Daniel,:
“Harry is my friend, but I don't believe that his procedure "washing and rinsing with water" has any influence to prevent adhesion formation. You and other should shout out the message about what gasless laparoscopy can prevent instead of using CO2 which is now in ***several studies recognized as a Co-factor in adhesion formation. In my opinion it shouldn't be used in any adhesioloysis procedure.”
Daniel> **“In my opinion the patient's who wants Harry should stay in US, as it is much better for them to get gas surgery and water rinsing for adhesiolysis.”
Daniel> **“None of his techniques prevents adhesions.”
I.) What is the point of having other surgeons perform surgery at Endogyn? Notice that Daniel’s total obsession is on Reich, verse any other member of his “team?” Why is that IHRT wonders!!
H.) Speaking of the “Endogyn” team, where is the psychiatrist Daniel promised in 2003? And the other things promised?
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=ICUsWfLyNECbm18kPm9cl0rIHF&forum=2&thread=570
· we will include a Yoga-teacher in our infrastructure
· EndoGyn® is opening a new center in Spain and 2 additional centers in Germany
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=ICUsWfLyNECbm18kPm9cl0rIHF&forum=2&thread=424
Posted Saturday, October 25, 2003 @ 05:33 PM
· Future: We hope to increase our success rate by changing the concepts of surgery …
A publication of our results will be soon on the way…
A special cooperation with Internet sources for gynaecological surgery will be established …
An improvement in quality regarding patients hosting infrastructure will be achieved …
We have a close cooperation with Prof. V. Paolucci, a very skilled general surgeon who also is using gasless-laparoscopy…
*“Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 10:12 AM
Subject: how are you
** From:
To Bev
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 10:32 AM
Subject: why ?
***IHRT asks Daniel,
“ Where are these reports , and we would like to see reports on the CO2 issue produced by someone either then your wife, please!
IHRT will also produce “scientific abstracts” on the CO2 subject, and these abstracts are NOT written by Daniels wife!
No comments:
Post a Comment