Daniel, give us a break.

Daniel DOESN'T say what the results were, very vague here!!! People will realize that he is not stating if adhesions were found or not..so what is the point here???
What happened between last month and this month that has Daniel NOT sharing just what WAS found in the second look of this patient?
If he is not going to share particulars, which he never had a problem doing before, then why is he even posting this personal information on this patient!
Though the way Daniel "exploits" his patients has always been sickening, as long as he is going to do it, tell it all like you have in the past! Your so good at telling "half" the story when it is conviniet for you, that you think no one will notice when you do it here, well, we did!

Where there adhesions, or not, Daniel?
What you DO NOT say, again, send the message that things were not as good as anyone hoped they would be, probably adhesions found! Your silence comes thorough "loud and clear, " here, Daniel!

We are not "stupid" women, and one day, Daniel, you will realize that! Well, maybe not! louder"

some more adhesiolysis cases...
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=aaOCl26qMINBEai8ftO1ugJwAq&forum=2&thread=2265
Posted Sunday, March 5, 2006 @ 03:46 AM

The second looks from last week have got very good results.
Jenifer from US was a new adhesion case and very sevcere adhesions.
We could manage to take them all down. --------------------
Daniel Kruschinski, MD)