Karen is now moving into her "2nd" phase of behaviors that are consistent with her retaliatory efforts when anyone questions anything about Daniel.
We will now see Karen inciting others to post against IHRT and sing praises for Daniel in her attempts to keep Daniel from having to answer questions posed to him regarding issues at Endogyn. We will see Karen's attempts to put the focus of recent issues about Endogyn and the surgery being performed there, and make it a "Bev & Dawn" issue about "competing" for the best surgeon type thing!
Bev and Dawn do not care what surgeon a persons goes to for an adhesiolysis, what we do care about if that patients secure honest answers and ethical presentations of the adhesiolysis procedure they are seeking...so the issues in IHRT are not about who goes to whom for a surgery, they are about the adhesiolysis procedure gone wrong in Endogyn and the unethical behaviors coming out of Endogyn!
(Please read through the IHRT material regarding Endogyn.)
Posted Monday, March 6, 2006 @ 11:35 PM
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=8YJhDRgIKVbfPK2FQ4GsOFHA4V&forum=2&thread=2259
IHRT would like to draw attention to this recent post in Endogyn by Lynn, a former patient of Daniels.
Though we are sure some patients did get well following an adhesiolysis at Endogyn, based on his own words, and pictures in his web site, 10% of his patients are returning for multiple surgeries due to the "Abdo-Lift!"
Persons afflicted with ARD secure improvements from adhesiolysis from many different surgeons, and many of those are in the USA, so claming a "success" by someone afflicted with ARD is always worth celebrating, and we would love to hear from more of Daniels patients who remain well after a year!
IHRT will consider that Lynn's results are what she claims them to be, however, she is a friend of Karen's, and by Lynn's own words, Karen contacted her to post against "Bev and Dawn" when Lynn knew nothing of the current issues being addressed in IHRT.
The sad thing about a post such as Lynn's, is that it is obvious that Lynn has not formularized herself with the issues surrounding IHRT's concerns regarding adhesiolysis at Endogyn when she states, "I have no idea why these two individuals continue to try and discredit a doctor who has helped so many women from all over the world." If Lynn has no idea as to the issues presented in IHRT, what is she basing her opinions on?? Lynn is simply parroting Karen's words here, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that Lynn has been encited to anger at Dawn and Bev, by her "friend"Karen Stewart, as niether Dawn or Bev has ever had any association with her for her to make such comments about them. Why would Lynn make such accusations? Has she ever heard Dawn or Bev doing such a thing? The truth here is that Karen recruited Lynn to post in an attempt to show cause FOR Daniel, rather then Daniel answering questions posed to him. Shame on you Lynn! A grown women allowing herself to be used by Karen in such a way!
IHRT asks Lynn to share her opinion on the "3rd look pictures" and "lack of information on 2nd look procedures" now being shared on Endogyn."
We also ask Lynn's opinion on Daniel's mocking of "Jesus" on the Endogyn web site.
We also ask Lynn if she can name some of those whom she has taken the liberty to speak for when she states that "most of the women" (in her comment here "If you would like to know, most of the women that have been helped by Dr. Kruschinski are out in the world enjoying life again." ) as it sounds like she is keeping contact with them.
Lynn, if you are able to communicate with them, why are they not posting for Daniel? IHRT does have a *list of over 150 + patients to Endogyn from 2003 - 2006" so we definately would recognize them if they posted. ( *IHRT will post them to the public as soon as we can. ( IHRT is making some contacts regarding this list and the results of those contacts will also be made public!)
You have to be carefull when stating that you are speaking for Daniels patients, and that most of his patients are now well, when Daniel cannot produce statistics on that, you say that you can as you know the surgical outcomes of most of his patients and that they are ARE well. Please share how you know this information.
Lynn, if you are posting Karen's words in an attempt to harvest patients to a surgery in which the surgeon himself states he cannot cure" them, is absolutely wrong and deceiving! No one gets the results that Daniel claims he gets from his surgeries, or at least that he used to get!
Now Lynn, to acclimate you to some of the reasons IHRT is concerned about things in Endogyn, we would like your opinion regarding the following issues, and in YOUR own words,please. This would help us better understand the issues at Endogyn that do concern us. In this way, you would be helping other patients make an informed decision because they understand better if they hear things from a patients perspective.
Lynn, what is your impression of the "3rd" look procedure as the reason Daniel offers that?
What is your impression of the pictures of adhesions that the "Abdolift" creates?
Would you have any second thoughts if you would have seen this information prior to you going to Endogyn?
If you would still go, what would you have based your decision on if you were not concerned about getting adhesions from the lift, and that you might have to make multiple trips to Endogyn? And concerns about those issues?
Lynn, do you know if these women are eating as well as Daniel claims in the Endogyn web site they will be eating after an adhesiolysis with him?
Lynn, what percent of Daniel's patients are "most" and are saying that they are all cured?
Where did you get this information, please?
Lynn, do you know why Daniel is NOT sharing information regarding the results of "2nd" look procedures when he used to tell it all?(Claimimg 100% adhesion free, over and over again!)
Lynn, though you are well following an adhesiolysis with Daniel, do you think it is fair for others to ask question regarding Daniels adhesiolysis and other things regarding Endogyn, or do you think people should just go to Daniel, no questions asked, because your well? What are your thoughts on this please?
Lynn, your words here are commendable, however, do you intend to just help "Karen and Daniel" advertise Endogyn, or do you intend to help other ARD patients make an informed decision about coming to Endogyn? Is this about "Karen" or what?? I don't understand these words, Lynn. Can you clarify them please? (Lynn's words: I will try to do more to help both Karen and Dr. Kru in any way possible!!!)
Lynn, what precipitated these words from you? (Lynn's words:"unless they were getting some kind of reward ) Have you ever communicated with Bev or Dawn? Have you ever seen "Dawn & Bev" exhibiting these behaviors? If so, please share where and when you personally have experienced what you accuse them of doing to secure "rewards."? (What would that "reward" be..just curious)
Lynn, when you state that you are speaking for Daniel's patients, and that most of his patients are now well, if Daniel cannot produce statistics on them, can you present them? You ARE stating that you know most of his patients ARE well. Please share how you know this information.
IHRT looks forward to hearing your response to our questions, as we know that you want to do everything possible to help Karen and Daniel, and by answering these concerns, in your own words as a former patient of Daniels, maybe you will put some of IHRT's issues to rest once and for all!
Lynn
Unregistered
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted Monday, March 6, 2006 @ 11:35 PM
I have no idea why these two individuals continue to try and discredit a doctor who has helped so many women from all over the world. I just don't know why someone would be so cruel unless they were getting some kind of reward for their slander. If you would like to know, most of the women that have been helped by Dr. Kruschinski are out in the world enjoying life again. Unfortunately, we have not been around to let everyone know how good we are feeling. It is not because we are still sick and in horrible pain, it is because we are ENJOYING OUR LIFE. I am sad to say that I have not been on line so I was unaware of what was being said about the one doctor that took the time to listen to me and help me. I should be like Karen spreading the word but I was too busy living.
I have personally met Karen and her daughter, Melissa. I can't believe someone could accuse her of not going through pain because she did not actually have the adhesions herself. If you are a parent, then you would know that you would much rather have the disease yourself instead of seeing your daughter suffer for 14 years and not be able to do anything about it. If it had not been for Karen and her determination, her daughter would probably have most of her abdominal organs removed and never be able to have a baby. She was told by several doctors in the U.S. that she would never be able to have children. WELL, THEY WERE WRONG!!!!!!! THANKS TO DR. KRUSCHINSKI, SHE IS PAIN FREE AND HAS A BABY!!!!!!
Fortunately, Karen is a strong woman. Otherwise, these so called people who accuse her and Dr. Kru of wrong doings would have silenced her. Thank God for Karen, and I will try to do more to help both Karen and Dr. Kru in any way possible!!!
For those of you (and you know who you are) that are trying to fill everyone's head with hatred and slander, go somewhere else!!!!!!! Why don't you just talk back and forth to each other via email so you can be miserable together and not upset other people who are really trying to help.
Lynn
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=8YJhDRgIKVbfPK2FQ4GsOFHA4V&forum=2&thread=2259
Thursday, March 09, 2006
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
A pictorial history of Adhesion Related Disorder advocacy
A pictorial history of Adhesion Related Disorder advocacy and
“Friendships found along the trail!”
Click here for Bev's picture trail.
Who's who in the world of Adhesion Related Disorder.
Left to Right: Dr. Mathias Korell, Germany, Dr. Alan Johns, USA, Dr. Victor Gomel, Canada, Dr. CJG Sutton, England, Dr. Dr. Alain J.M. Audebert, France, Dr. Harry Reich, USA, Dr. L. Mettler, Germany
http://www.adhesionrelateddisorder.com/BJD-Picture-Trail.html
“Friendships found along the trail!”
Click here for Bev's picture trail.
Who's who in the world of Adhesion Related Disorder.
Left to Right: Dr. Mathias Korell, Germany, Dr. Alan Johns, USA, Dr. Victor Gomel, Canada, Dr. CJG Sutton, England, Dr. Dr. Alain J.M. Audebert, France, Dr. Harry Reich, USA, Dr. L. Mettler, Germany
http://www.adhesionrelateddisorder.com/BJD-Picture-Trail.html
Monday, March 06, 2006
The only way...
-------Original Message------- From: Dr. Kruschinski Date: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:02:55 AM To: stew@cowtown.net Subject: Re: Melissa Steward Dear Karen, thank you for the reports and pictures. It looks like Melisa would have a lot of the only way to remove adhesions is GASLESS-laparoscopic adhesiolysis and SPRAYGEL endometriosis tissue that is occurent. The pictures show me enough so you don't ons and pain free, if you would like to come over to Germany with her. You can contact Lisa Graven for further informations about the trip and other topics. Regards Daniel
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0211/0570.html
It actually makes me feel bad for Karen.
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0211/0570.html
It actually makes me feel bad for Karen.
Your silence comes through "loud and clear
I went to Endogyn:
Daniel still isn't stating what the "second" look results were on the patients from LAST week, not about Jennifer's surgery, as she is still waiting her second look.
I was talking about those who had initial surgeries last week, and his "vague" report regarding THOSE second look results!
Daniel has not shared that information...
And, Karen is being rather.."quite" in her postings (3/6/06) to those three posts of (3/5/06!!)
Daniel DOESN'T say what the results were, very vague here!!! People will realize that he is not stating if adhesions were found or not..so what is the point here???
What happened between last month and this month that has Daniel NOT sharing just what WAS found in the second look of this patient?
If he is not going to share particulars, which he never had a problem doing before, then why is he even posting this personal information on this patient!
Though the way Daniel "exploits" his patients has always been sickening, as long as he is going to do it, tell it all like you have in the past! Your so good at telling "half" the story when it is convenient for you, that you think no one will notice when you do it here, well, we did!
Where there adhesions, or not, Daniel?
What you DO NOT say, again, send the message that things were not as good as anyone hoped they would be, probably adhesions found! Your silence comes through "loud and clear, " here, Daniel!
We are not "stupid" women, and one day, Daniel, you will realize that! Well, maybe not! louder"
some more adhesiolysis cases...
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=aaOCl26qMINBEai8ftO1ugJwAq&forum=2&thread=2265
Posted Sunday, March 5, 2006 @ 03:46 AM
The second looks from last week have got very good results.
Jenifer from US was a new adhesion case and very sevcere adhesions.
We could manage to take them all down. --------------------
Daniel Kruschinski, MD)
Daniel still isn't stating what the "second" look results were on the patients from LAST week, not about Jennifer's surgery, as she is still waiting her second look.
I was talking about those who had initial surgeries last week, and his "vague" report regarding THOSE second look results!
Daniel has not shared that information...
And, Karen is being rather.."quite" in her postings (3/6/06) to those three posts of (3/5/06!!)
Daniel DOESN'T say what the results were, very vague here!!! People will realize that he is not stating if adhesions were found or not..so what is the point here???
What happened between last month and this month that has Daniel NOT sharing just what WAS found in the second look of this patient?
If he is not going to share particulars, which he never had a problem doing before, then why is he even posting this personal information on this patient!
Though the way Daniel "exploits" his patients has always been sickening, as long as he is going to do it, tell it all like you have in the past! Your so good at telling "half" the story when it is convenient for you, that you think no one will notice when you do it here, well, we did!
Where there adhesions, or not, Daniel?
What you DO NOT say, again, send the message that things were not as good as anyone hoped they would be, probably adhesions found! Your silence comes through "loud and clear, " here, Daniel!
We are not "stupid" women, and one day, Daniel, you will realize that! Well, maybe not! louder"
some more adhesiolysis cases...
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=aaOCl26qMINBEai8ftO1ugJwAq&forum=2&thread=2265
Posted Sunday, March 5, 2006 @ 03:46 AM
The second looks from last week have got very good results.
Jenifer from US was a new adhesion case and very sevcere adhesions.
We could manage to take them all down. --------------------
Daniel Kruschinski, MD)
Sunday, March 05, 2006
Daniel, NEW!??
new scientific literature on Lift laparoscopy..
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=aaOCl26qMINBEai8ftO1ugJwAq&forum=2&thread=2266
Posted Sunday, March 5, 2006 @ 03:51 AM
Daniel,
NEW!??
Either YOU wrote the material here or is is dated 2003! And the results of the 2003 report regarding the "Abdolift" is that it saves money and a little time in the surgery! But most important,YOU did all the surgeries, and never reported what the "Abdolift" did to the patients post operative of it's use on them...as in this NEW revelation of yours! Why not add this information to that report, Daniel???
Posted Saturday, January 22, 2005 @ 05:01 AM
Behind our concept of offering the 3rd look laparoscopy for minimal cost is a true idealism, in the end to improve, if not to cure adhesion sufferers.
Dr. Kru..."Here you see how important it is to have the back-door opportunity of a 3rd-look laparoscopy. An adhesion formed to the umbilical incision of the second-look laparoscopy, and there is no way to avoid or exclude this as it is the last port that is open after we finish surgery, and this is still a very small wounded area with a minimal blood area where adhesions can form."
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=aaOCl26qMINBEai8ftO1ugJwAq&forum=2&thread=1392
Kruschinski D
Laparoscopic GYN: 4 Reasons to Go Gasless
OutpatientsSurgery, VOLUME VI, NO. 1, 49-53 (2006)
Original paper (pdf file) Outpatient Surgery Magazine
http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/publikation/GaslessLaparoscopy.pdf
Kruschinski D, Homburg S, Wockel A, Kapur A, Reich H.
Lift-laparoscopic total hysterectomy as a routine procedure.
Surg Technol Int. 13; 147-156 (2004)
Original paper (pdf file) Surgical Technology International
http://www.surgicaltechnology.com/STI-XIII-Author-Link/Kruschinski--Lift-Laparoscopic-Total-Hysterectomy.pdf
Kruschinski D, Homburg S
Lift-(Gasless) Laparoscopic Surgery Under Regional Anesthesia.
Surg Technol Int. 14; 147-156 (2005)
Daniel, give us a break. However, when you post, you too give us material that seems to need exposure and clarification as you never seem to say it all!
3/5/06
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=aaOCl26qMINBEai8ftO1ugJwAq&forum=2&thread=2266
Posted Sunday, March 5, 2006 @ 03:51 AM
Daniel,
NEW!??
Either YOU wrote the material here or is is dated 2003! And the results of the 2003 report regarding the "Abdolift" is that it saves money and a little time in the surgery! But most important,YOU did all the surgeries, and never reported what the "Abdolift" did to the patients post operative of it's use on them...as in this NEW revelation of yours! Why not add this information to that report, Daniel???
Posted Saturday, January 22, 2005 @ 05:01 AM
Behind our concept of offering the 3rd look laparoscopy for minimal cost is a true idealism, in the end to improve, if not to cure adhesion sufferers.
Dr. Kru..."Here you see how important it is to have the back-door opportunity of a 3rd-look laparoscopy. An adhesion formed to the umbilical incision of the second-look laparoscopy, and there is no way to avoid or exclude this as it is the last port that is open after we finish surgery, and this is still a very small wounded area with a minimal blood area where adhesions can form."
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=aaOCl26qMINBEai8ftO1ugJwAq&forum=2&thread=1392
Kruschinski D
Laparoscopic GYN: 4 Reasons to Go Gasless
OutpatientsSurgery, VOLUME VI, NO. 1, 49-53 (2006)
Original paper (pdf file) Outpatient Surgery Magazine
http://www.endogyn.de/db/img/publikation/GaslessLaparoscopy.pdf
Kruschinski D, Homburg S, Wockel A, Kapur A, Reich H.
Lift-laparoscopic total hysterectomy as a routine procedure.
Surg Technol Int. 13; 147-156 (2004)
Original paper (pdf file) Surgical Technology International
http://www.surgicaltechnology.com/STI-XIII-Author-Link/Kruschinski--Lift-Laparoscopic-Total-Hysterectomy.pdf
Kruschinski D, Homburg S
Lift-(Gasless) Laparoscopic Surgery Under Regional Anesthesia.
Surg Technol Int. 14; 147-156 (2005)
Daniel, give us a break. However, when you post, you too give us material that seems to need exposure and clarification as you never seem to say it all!
3/5/06
Daniel, give us a break.
Daniel DOESN'T say what the results were, very vague here!!! People will realize that he is not stating if adhesions were found or not..so what is the point here???
What happened between last month and this month that has Daniel NOT sharing just what WAS found in the second look of this patient?
If he is not going to share particulars, which he never had a problem doing before, then why is he even posting this personal information on this patient!
Though the way Daniel "exploits" his patients has always been sickening, as long as he is going to do it, tell it all like you have in the past! Your so good at telling "half" the story when it is conviniet for you, that you think no one will notice when you do it here, well, we did!
Where there adhesions, or not, Daniel?
What you DO NOT say, again, send the message that things were not as good as anyone hoped they would be, probably adhesions found! Your silence comes thorough "loud and clear, " here, Daniel!
We are not "stupid" women, and one day, Daniel, you will realize that! Well, maybe not! louder"
some more adhesiolysis cases...
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=aaOCl26qMINBEai8ftO1ugJwAq&forum=2&thread=2265
Posted Sunday, March 5, 2006 @ 03:46 AM
The second looks from last week have got very good results.
Jenifer from US was a new adhesion case and very sevcere adhesions.
We could manage to take them all down. --------------------
Daniel Kruschinski, MD)
Saturday, March 04, 2006
Right now it appears Daniel Kruschinski of Endogyn has no credentials.....
Right now it appears Daniel Kruschinski of Endogyn has no credentials.....
at least not that anyone can find........
as far as can be found in endogyn website or through extensive internet searches
Thank-you Helen for your post regarding "CREDENTIALS OF DANIEL KRUSCHINSKI, M.D."
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=LvjTp0A2sEGvqabslNYN6fSpkG&forum=2&thread=2253
Helen is known for her stand that " Knowledge IS Power" and we are certain she will agree that ANYONE even remotely
interested in securing the gasless surgical procedure being offered at Endogyn, must know as much about the surgeon
performing that procedure as the procedure itself! Helen has shared this much about Daniel "Doc-Kru" and it is nice, however, it falls very short of what "Credentials" mean!
We see here that Daniel has a:
picture,
position at Endogyn,
memberships,
publications,
that he lectures, and
that he has an "email'
and that he is busy "franchising" endoscopic gynecologic surgery in Germany and other countries.
...Daniel Kruschinski appears to use his patients for every single point of issue.
He has to take responsibility for himself.
Let me try to make this a bit more clear here, and that it is necessary for DANIEL to respond for himself, as when his patients speak for him, some made the error of stating that Daniel " invented" the Abdolift" when he really did not! It is also very improper for patients to be answering medical information and credentials of someone claiming to be a Dr, when there is no validation of that to been seen.
"Catch Me If You Can" Die wahre Story einer genialen Täschung. (The true story of an ingenious deception.)
The true story of a real fake, Frank Abagnale, Jr. more:..http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0264464/quotes
A true story about Frank Abagnale Jr. who, before his 19th birthday, successfully conned millions of dollars worth of checks as a Pan Am pilot, doctor, and legal prosecutor. Frank didn't go to flight school...Frank didn't go to medical school...Frank didn't go to law school...because Franks still in high school!
Daniel, please present your "CREDENTIALS" as IHRT will continue to ask for them until they are made public, BY YOU or you confess that you do not have any!
What we would now like to know is "ACADEMIC RECORDS"& "LICENSURE AND ACCREDITATIONS"
Degree & Past Attendance Verification
Verifiable Certifications
Academic Transcripts
Verify Enrollment
Status at Centers of Education,
and in this case, Medical Colleges
To state it easier to understand, what we are asking DANIEL to produce on are the following!
This is important for patients seeking information about the surgeon they might elect to pursue for medical intervention. This information IS a " Patients Right To Know" in order for them to make an informed decision regarding their medical intervention! Without it, there exists a very dangerous gap in information about Daniel Kruschinski as a qualified surgeon for ARD and "plastic" surgery!!
IHRT asks for this information to be made available to prospective patients and publicly.
Where did he graduate from high school and when?
What, if any, degrees does he have?
Where did he graduate from medical school?
What special degrees or education did he graduate from medical schools with?
What medical schools did he secure his, "plastic surgery" education at?
IHRT will be reveling a list of questions that MUST be asked by prospective patients to Endogyn that MUST be addressed and answered to by Daniel Kruschinski if they are to be informative enough for you to make an "Informed Decision!" Questions posed to Endogyn do differ from any questions posed to other prospective surgeons for adhesions, as Daniel does not appear to have the credentials to even be performing sugary, let alone adhesiolysis procedures, and most incriminating is that he professes to be a "plastic" surgeon, but no credentials available for that either. There are NO validations of any credentials for Daniel Kruschinski, so IHRT says be wary of securing a surgery at Ebdogyn," whether they offer reduced rates or rate specials" or not, as it is just NOT worth it!
Helen, you state in Endogyn message board that, "I had such a difficult time trying to find Dr. Kruschinski's credentials," why don't you just ask him for them???
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=LvjTp0A2sEGvqabslNYN6fSpkG&forum=2&thread=2253
Posted Monday, February 27, 2006 @ 02:04 AM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Since I had such a difficult time trying to find Dr. Kruschinski's credentials, I have decided to post his credentials here where visitors to this website will be able to learn more about Dr. Kruschinski and his accomplishments.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> CREDENTIALS OF DANIEL KRUSCHINSKI, M.D.
Updated: February 26, 2006
1.) EndoGyn® - Institute for endoscopic Gynecology... Daniel Kruschinski, M.D.
http://www.EndoGyn.com
Click: Endogyn > Physicians >
Dr. Kruschinski
- Photo & Short CV
- Current position
- Memberships
- Publications
- Lectures
- eMail
- -
2.) SurgeryU: Online Procedures from the World's Leading Surgeons
http://surgeryu.com/index2.php?page=doctors&id=19
Daniel Kruschinski, M.D.
Dr. Daniel Kruschinski is one of the founders of the gasless laparoscopy in gynecology. Since 1990, Dr. Kruschinski has performed scientific and clinical research in this pioneering field, also known as Lift-Laparoscopy, with more than 2500 advanced operative cases. He developed and designed several abdominal wall-lifting systems, including the recent AbdoLift, a Karl Storz product. Dr. Kruschinski is currently involved in franchising endoscopic gynecologic surgery in Germany and other countries.
Contact Information:
» phone: +49 180 3636496
» phone/fax: +49 7000 3636496
» email: Daniel.Kruschinski@EndoGyn.com
» website: http://www.EndoGyn.com
Click here to view medical procedures by Daniel
- -
3.) Daniel Kruschinski, MD
http://www.obgyn.net/meet.asp?page=/all_advisors/D_Kruschinski
OBGYN.netEditorial Advisor Laparoscopy & Hysteroscopy
at least not that anyone can find........
as far as can be found in endogyn website or through extensive internet searches
Thank-you Helen for your post regarding "CREDENTIALS OF DANIEL KRUSCHINSKI, M.D."
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=LvjTp0A2sEGvqabslNYN6fSpkG&forum=2&thread=2253
Helen is known for her stand that " Knowledge IS Power" and we are certain she will agree that ANYONE even remotely
interested in securing the gasless surgical procedure being offered at Endogyn, must know as much about the surgeon
performing that procedure as the procedure itself! Helen has shared this much about Daniel "Doc-Kru" and it is nice, however, it falls very short of what "Credentials" mean!
We see here that Daniel has a:
picture,
position at Endogyn,
memberships,
publications,
that he lectures, and
that he has an "email'
and that he is busy "franchising" endoscopic gynecologic surgery in Germany and other countries.
...Daniel Kruschinski appears to use his patients for every single point of issue.
He has to take responsibility for himself.
Let me try to make this a bit more clear here, and that it is necessary for DANIEL to respond for himself, as when his patients speak for him, some made the error of stating that Daniel " invented" the Abdolift" when he really did not! It is also very improper for patients to be answering medical information and credentials of someone claiming to be a Dr, when there is no validation of that to been seen.
"Catch Me If You Can" Die wahre Story einer genialen Täschung. (The true story of an ingenious deception.)
The true story of a real fake, Frank Abagnale, Jr. more:..http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0264464/quotes
A true story about Frank Abagnale Jr. who, before his 19th birthday, successfully conned millions of dollars worth of checks as a Pan Am pilot, doctor, and legal prosecutor. Frank didn't go to flight school...Frank didn't go to medical school...Frank didn't go to law school...because Franks still in high school!
Daniel, please present your "CREDENTIALS" as IHRT will continue to ask for them until they are made public, BY YOU or you confess that you do not have any!
What we would now like to know is "ACADEMIC RECORDS"& "LICENSURE AND ACCREDITATIONS"
Degree & Past Attendance Verification
Verifiable Certifications
Academic Transcripts
Verify Enrollment
Status at Centers of Education,
and in this case, Medical Colleges
To state it easier to understand, what we are asking DANIEL to produce on are the following!
This is important for patients seeking information about the surgeon they might elect to pursue for medical intervention. This information IS a " Patients Right To Know" in order for them to make an informed decision regarding their medical intervention! Without it, there exists a very dangerous gap in information about Daniel Kruschinski as a qualified surgeon for ARD and "plastic" surgery!!
IHRT asks for this information to be made available to prospective patients and publicly.
Where did he graduate from high school and when?
What, if any, degrees does he have?
Where did he graduate from medical school?
What special degrees or education did he graduate from medical schools with?
What medical schools did he secure his, "plastic surgery" education at?
IHRT will be reveling a list of questions that MUST be asked by prospective patients to Endogyn that MUST be addressed and answered to by Daniel Kruschinski if they are to be informative enough for you to make an "Informed Decision!" Questions posed to Endogyn do differ from any questions posed to other prospective surgeons for adhesions, as Daniel does not appear to have the credentials to even be performing sugary, let alone adhesiolysis procedures, and most incriminating is that he professes to be a "plastic" surgeon, but no credentials available for that either. There are NO validations of any credentials for Daniel Kruschinski, so IHRT says be wary of securing a surgery at Ebdogyn," whether they offer reduced rates or rate specials" or not, as it is just NOT worth it!
Helen, you state in Endogyn message board that, "I had such a difficult time trying to find Dr. Kruschinski's credentials," why don't you just ask him for them???
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=LvjTp0A2sEGvqabslNYN6fSpkG&forum=2&thread=2253
Posted Monday, February 27, 2006 @ 02:04 AM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Since I had such a difficult time trying to find Dr. Kruschinski's credentials, I have decided to post his credentials here where visitors to this website will be able to learn more about Dr. Kruschinski and his accomplishments.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> CREDENTIALS OF DANIEL KRUSCHINSKI, M.D.
Updated: February 26, 2006
1.) EndoGyn® - Institute for endoscopic Gynecology... Daniel Kruschinski, M.D.
http://www.EndoGyn.com
Click: Endogyn > Physicians >
Dr. Kruschinski
- Photo & Short CV
- Current position
- Memberships
- Publications
- Lectures
- -
2.) SurgeryU: Online Procedures from the World's Leading Surgeons
http://surgeryu.com/index2.php?page=doctors&id=19
Daniel Kruschinski, M.D.
Dr. Daniel Kruschinski is one of the founders of the gasless laparoscopy in gynecology. Since 1990, Dr. Kruschinski has performed scientific and clinical research in this pioneering field, also known as Lift-Laparoscopy, with more than 2500 advanced operative cases. He developed and designed several abdominal wall-lifting systems, including the recent AbdoLift, a Karl Storz product. Dr. Kruschinski is currently involved in franchising endoscopic gynecologic surgery in Germany and other countries.
Contact Information:
» phone: +49 180 3636496
» phone/fax: +49 7000 3636496
» email: Daniel.Kruschinski@EndoGyn.com
» website: http://www.EndoGyn.com
Click here to view medical procedures by Daniel
- -
3.) Daniel Kruschinski, MD
http://www.obgyn.net/meet.asp?page=/all_advisors/D_Kruschinski
OBGYN.netEditorial Advisor Laparoscopy & Hysteroscopy
Modified from Diamond MP;Please read the following information regarding the gasless laporoscopy found in Endogyn
Please read the following information regarding the gasless laporoscopy found in Endogyn.. http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=YOdBxxklj26I7s8a37A4lYY62C&forum=2&thread=873
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Doc_Kru Posted Tuesday, April 6, 2004 @ 12:11 PM
“I was asked to write about a comment to a post about carbon dioxide, made on one of the message boards.
Sally was trying to explain the risks of gasless laparoscopy by her own words, to make it clear to patients, but the response was anything else than: " there is no risk of carbon dioxide regarding adhesion formation...as a doctor, who was asked about it, said, there is no risk..." I'm not speaking about MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE how to perform surgery, as "I would say, I drink tea with milk, as it tastes better, other drink without ...", I'm speaking about the evident data that is collected and published by experimental studies and clinical reaserch ! Not the "postoperative effects on the body" are important, but the destructive effect of carbon dioxide that causes injury / lesion to the peritoneum and by this causes adhesion formation !!! First of all, please look at Shirlis biochemical explanation here: http://www.forenserver.ad-top.de/cgi-bin/foren/F_210/cutecast.pl?session=5N5dBgxLJqRs5vnU91QkRGPeN7&forum=21&thread=433
And here are some pictures of a lecture on an international congress where I'm presenting the statistics, the data and the images of systematically collected data from 33 patients with an follow-up of more than 12 months, that show the excellent results of over 90 % adhesion and pain free patients, treated with gasless laparoscopy in combination with SprayGel.
“Here is the pathogenesis of adhesion formation “
Bev Doucette’s note: This depiction of the “pathogenesis of adhesion formation” that is shown on Endogyn, occurs in ALL human beings and with ALL surgical procedures! For much of the same, please visit the: Women's Surgery Group: http://www.womenssurgerygroup.com“All surgeons must deal with the potential for formation of adhesions after surgery, as well as the sequelae of adhesions from previous surgery which may markedly increase the difficulty of any particular surgerical case.
Post-surgical adhesions often occur following pelvic and abdominal surgery. Data has suggested that 67% to 93% of patients will develop adhesions following non-gynecologic abdominal surgery and 55% to 100% of patients will develop adhesions following gynecologic surgery. These issues become critically important from a standpoint of reproductive potential.Additionally, adhesions may be associated with issues such as pelvic pain, abnormalities of bowel function, and small bowel obstruction. More….http://www.womenssurgerygroup.com/conditions/Adhesions/overview.asp
In case you missed it in Endogyn….
Please note that the following information located in the Endgogyn web site has been “MODIFIED” by Daniel Kruschinski to show what HE wants portrayed in Dr. Diamond’s material!
http://www.adhesions.de/index.php?seite=verw&sprache=en&a=Aboutadhesions&b=aboutdifferenttypesofadjuv
WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF ADJUVANTS USED TO PREVENT ADHESIONS?
Adhesion formation and reformation are still an unavoidable event in reproductive pelvic surgery in spite of the variable skills in microsurgery and endoscopic surgery.
This fact necessitates the search for barrier that can be used in the perioperative period.
There have various barriers or adjuvants that have been used but none have conclusively proven to be effective in various studies.
CLASSES OF ADHESION-REDUCTION ADJUVANTS AND THEIR PROPOSED MECHANISM OF ACTION
Modified from Diamond MP, DeCherney AH: Pathogenesis of adhesion formation/reformation: Application to reproductive pelvic surgery. Microsurgery 1987: 8: 103 and Diamond MP, Hershlag A: Adhesion formation/reformation: in Treatment of postsurgical Adhesions, Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1990: 23-33.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Doc_Kru Posted Tuesday, April 6, 2004 @ 12:11 PM
“I was asked to write about a comment to a post about carbon dioxide, made on one of the message boards.
Sally was trying to explain the risks of gasless laparoscopy by her own words, to make it clear to patients, but the response was anything else than: " there is no risk of carbon dioxide regarding adhesion formation...as a doctor, who was asked about it, said, there is no risk..." I'm not speaking about MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE how to perform surgery, as "I would say, I drink tea with milk, as it tastes better, other drink without ...", I'm speaking about the evident data that is collected and published by experimental studies and clinical reaserch ! Not the "postoperative effects on the body" are important, but the destructive effect of carbon dioxide that causes injury / lesion to the peritoneum and by this causes adhesion formation !!! First of all, please look at Shirlis biochemical explanation here: http://www.forenserver.ad-top.de/cgi-bin/foren/F_210/cutecast.pl?session=5N5dBgxLJqRs5vnU91QkRGPeN7&forum=21&thread=433
And here are some pictures of a lecture on an international congress where I'm presenting the statistics, the data and the images of systematically collected data from 33 patients with an follow-up of more than 12 months, that show the excellent results of over 90 % adhesion and pain free patients, treated with gasless laparoscopy in combination with SprayGel.
“Here is the pathogenesis of adhesion formation “
Bev Doucette’s note: This depiction of the “pathogenesis of adhesion formation” that is shown on Endogyn, occurs in ALL human beings and with ALL surgical procedures! For much of the same, please visit the: Women's Surgery Group: http://www.womenssurgerygroup.com“All surgeons must deal with the potential for formation of adhesions after surgery, as well as the sequelae of adhesions from previous surgery which may markedly increase the difficulty of any particular surgerical case.
Post-surgical adhesions often occur following pelvic and abdominal surgery. Data has suggested that 67% to 93% of patients will develop adhesions following non-gynecologic abdominal surgery and 55% to 100% of patients will develop adhesions following gynecologic surgery. These issues become critically important from a standpoint of reproductive potential.Additionally, adhesions may be associated with issues such as pelvic pain, abnormalities of bowel function, and small bowel obstruction. More….http://www.womenssurgerygroup.com/conditions/Adhesions/overview.asp
In case you missed it in Endogyn….
Please note that the following information located in the Endgogyn web site has been “MODIFIED” by Daniel Kruschinski to show what HE wants portrayed in Dr. Diamond’s material!
http://www.adhesions.de/index.php?seite=verw&sprache=en&a=Aboutadhesions&b=aboutdifferenttypesofadjuv
WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF ADJUVANTS USED TO PREVENT ADHESIONS?
Adhesion formation and reformation are still an unavoidable event in reproductive pelvic surgery in spite of the variable skills in microsurgery and endoscopic surgery.
This fact necessitates the search for barrier that can be used in the perioperative period.
There have various barriers or adjuvants that have been used but none have conclusively proven to be effective in various studies.
CLASSES OF ADHESION-REDUCTION ADJUVANTS AND THEIR PROPOSED MECHANISM OF ACTION
Modified from Diamond MP, DeCherney AH: Pathogenesis of adhesion formation/reformation: Application to reproductive pelvic surgery. Microsurgery 1987: 8: 103 and Diamond MP, Hershlag A: Adhesion formation/reformation: in Treatment of postsurgical Adhesions, Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1990: 23-33.
Abdo-Lift® gasless laparoscopy
Abdo-Lift® gasless laparoscopy prevents numerous intraoperative problems that occur specifically with CO2….. more:http://www.karlstorz.com/
IHRT would, again, like to thank Helen Dynda for sharing this information & web link with us regarding the surgical gasless procedures being used at “Endogyn” Frankfurt, Germany! It really does offer up some very important information that seems to have been oppressed from the Endogyn web site and information that simply appears to have been “embellished” on the Endogyn web site as well! Again, IHRT could not have secured this “NEW” information regarding surgery with the “Abdolift®” without Helen’s assistance.
IHRT stands by their claim that “The adhesiolysis procedure performed at Endogyn does NOT benefit an ARD patient by either the “Abdolift®” OR the “Sprygel, so save your money, time and energy going to Endogyn, as it offers less then more for persons afflicted with ARD!”
ALL prospective patients to Endogyn MUST read this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Endogyn®-Institute for endoscopic Gynecology
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en&a=Specialtreatments&b=Gaslesslaparoscopy&c=Advantages
1.) Click: Special treatments
2.) At the left, click on: Gasless Laparoscopy
3.) Click on: What makes the difference? “ Cartoon” and information about the “mechanics of the “Abdolift®” and in the last box on this page, it contains information that is NOT validated by anything other then Daniel and his wife’s “research,” which is bogus as there is nothing “noxious” during any intra-abdominal surgery no mater the procedure!!
4.) Click: Why gasless? This article does NOT contain anything to substantiate Daniels claims that the “Abdolift®” “Avoids hypoxaemia and dessication of the peritoneum & Evades detrimental and noxious consequences for peritoneal cells” There IS NO validation of this occurring in any intra-abdominal surgical procedure!
5.) Click: Method & Technique: This box contains information that equates gasless surgery with open surgery AND the benefits of a laporoscpoic surgery, there is absolutely nothing about any physiological consequences or benefits of either procedure! What appears to be a difference though not listed in this material is that gasless creates a huge adhesion at the site of introducing the hook, where laporoscopic surgery does not.
6.) Results: Click on Advantages: “All the “advantages of a gasless procedures listed here are the mechanical aspects and financial savings to the hospital, some discomfort to the patients, however again, there is NO mention of any benefits to the tissues located within the peritoneum, nor to any destruction of tissues within the peritoneum if surgery is done without a gasless procedure. Nothing one-way or the other really differs with a non-gasless surgery or a gasless one other then the gasless creates a huge adhesion at the site of introducing the hook, where laporoscopic surgery does not!
7.) Click on: “Experimental studies” give this page time to load please as it is worth the wait!
Conclusion: It appears to us that Daniel tucks the “truth of the benefits of the Abdolift®” away within Endogyn, rather then placing it on the “message board” for all to read as part of a “Patients Rights to Know” so they can be as informed as possible prior to securing a surgery at Endogyn! This material offers up the truth of Daniels claims of “reduced tissue damage compared to any other surgery,” by use of the Abdolift®! Seems that it is not true at all..
Reply to:
KARL STORZ Web site information bring up tons of questions!
Helen, can you find any information to validate any pathogenesis benefits to the gasless surgery at Endogyn, other then Daniel and his wife’s “research!”
We would also like to know who they did this research on…people?
Can you find out if anyone else in the world is using any type of “abdominal lift apparatus??
Thank-you for the good work here, Helen! As we can see here in the KARL STORZ
Web site regarding the “Gasless Laparoscopy with Abdo-Lift®, “ it appears the the most significant difference is the gas that can escape during a laporoscopy using gas, however, it doesn’t mention that gas can be introduced at any time and is monitored for effectiveness during the procedure! There is nothing about an “Pathengesis” distruction of tissue, as Daniel claims, and there really is nothing stating any studies of it’s use for “adhesions” nor is there any mention of the possibility that the entrance site can cause adhesions, and we know without any study by the KARL STORZ Co. that it can! However, IHRT will be contacting the KARL STORZ Co. regarding the pictures in Endogyn and Daniels comments regarding 3rd look procedures and adhesions caused by their “Abdolift®!” (This is so disturbing to IHRT because it appears that not even the “SprayGel” adhesion barrier is effective on this type of adhesions, and we KNOW that SprayGel is one of the most effective adhesion barriers ever developed, but not in Daniel adhesiolysis procedures!
Based on everthing we have read, and what Helen has brought to our attention, IHRT can only conclude that the adhesiolysis procedure performed at Endogyn does NOT benefit an ARD patient by use of either the “Abdolift®” OR “Sprygel, so save your money, time and energy going to Endogyn, as it offers less then more for persons afflicted with ARD!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here are some of the concerns IHRT will bring up to KARL STORZ Co:
1.) How would an ARD patient going to Endogn know if a “4th” surgery would be necessary if the ““Abdolift®” causes adhesions in the 2nd, and now a 3rd look, and
2.) Do I think that the ““Abdolift®” undermines the “gasless” part of the adhesiolysis from being as successful and necessary as the surgeon there states it is?
3.) How can the adhesiolysis with the “Abdolift®” be better for an ARD patient if it causes adhesions?
4.) What makes this surgery in Germany better then any adhesiolysis here in the USA if the “Spraygel” is as ineffective as this surgeon at Endogyn states it is when used with gas, yet there were a lot of adhesions in the second and third looks from his surgery with the “Abdolift®!”
5.) What would the reason be for an ARD patient to go there (Endogyn) if they have to go back that far again and again when your being told that a “Abdolift®” gasless surgery with “Spraygel” isn’t as successful as once thought?
6.) It is so confusing to see these pictures and read that the “Abdolift®” gasless procedure is the best, yet I see all those adhesions in his pictures and he says they are from 2nd, & 3rd looks from his procedure, what is the truth? Of course, pictures are truth, but why would he keep using that “hook” when he knows it causes adhesions?
7.) Why doesn’t Storz have any information regarding adhesions and the “Abdolift®!”
8.) Why isn’t the “Spraygel” working in Dr. Kruschinski's gasless surgery?
IHRT would, again, like to thank Helen Dynda for sharing this information & web link with us regarding the surgical gasless procedures being used at “Endogyn” Frankfurt, Germany! It really does offer up some very important information that seems to have been oppressed from the Endogyn web site and information that simply appears to have been “embellished” on the Endogyn web site as well! Again, IHRT could not have secured this “NEW” information regarding surgery with the “Abdolift®” without Helen’s assistance.
IHRT stands by their claim that “The adhesiolysis procedure performed at Endogyn does NOT benefit an ARD patient by either the “Abdolift®” OR the “Sprygel, so save your money, time and energy going to Endogyn, as it offers less then more for persons afflicted with ARD!”
ALL prospective patients to Endogyn MUST read this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Endogyn®-Institute for endoscopic Gynecology
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en&a=Specialtreatments&b=Gaslesslaparoscopy&c=Advantages
1.) Click: Special treatments
2.) At the left, click on: Gasless Laparoscopy
3.) Click on: What makes the difference? “ Cartoon” and information about the “mechanics of the “Abdolift®” and in the last box on this page, it contains information that is NOT validated by anything other then Daniel and his wife’s “research,” which is bogus as there is nothing “noxious” during any intra-abdominal surgery no mater the procedure!!
4.) Click: Why gasless? This article does NOT contain anything to substantiate Daniels claims that the “Abdolift®” “Avoids hypoxaemia and dessication of the peritoneum & Evades detrimental and noxious consequences for peritoneal cells” There IS NO validation of this occurring in any intra-abdominal surgical procedure!
5.) Click: Method & Technique: This box contains information that equates gasless surgery with open surgery AND the benefits of a laporoscpoic surgery, there is absolutely nothing about any physiological consequences or benefits of either procedure! What appears to be a difference though not listed in this material is that gasless creates a huge adhesion at the site of introducing the hook, where laporoscopic surgery does not.
6.) Results: Click on Advantages: “All the “advantages of a gasless procedures listed here are the mechanical aspects and financial savings to the hospital, some discomfort to the patients, however again, there is NO mention of any benefits to the tissues located within the peritoneum, nor to any destruction of tissues within the peritoneum if surgery is done without a gasless procedure. Nothing one-way or the other really differs with a non-gasless surgery or a gasless one other then the gasless creates a huge adhesion at the site of introducing the hook, where laporoscopic surgery does not!
7.) Click on: “Experimental studies” give this page time to load please as it is worth the wait!
Conclusion: It appears to us that Daniel tucks the “truth of the benefits of the Abdolift®” away within Endogyn, rather then placing it on the “message board” for all to read as part of a “Patients Rights to Know” so they can be as informed as possible prior to securing a surgery at Endogyn! This material offers up the truth of Daniels claims of “reduced tissue damage compared to any other surgery,” by use of the Abdolift®! Seems that it is not true at all..
Reply to:
KARL STORZ Web site information bring up tons of questions!
Helen, can you find any information to validate any pathogenesis benefits to the gasless surgery at Endogyn, other then Daniel and his wife’s “research!”
We would also like to know who they did this research on…people?
Can you find out if anyone else in the world is using any type of “abdominal lift apparatus??
Thank-you for the good work here, Helen! As we can see here in the KARL STORZ
Web site regarding the “Gasless Laparoscopy with Abdo-Lift®, “ it appears the the most significant difference is the gas that can escape during a laporoscopy using gas, however, it doesn’t mention that gas can be introduced at any time and is monitored for effectiveness during the procedure! There is nothing about an “Pathengesis” distruction of tissue, as Daniel claims, and there really is nothing stating any studies of it’s use for “adhesions” nor is there any mention of the possibility that the entrance site can cause adhesions, and we know without any study by the KARL STORZ Co. that it can! However, IHRT will be contacting the KARL STORZ Co. regarding the pictures in Endogyn and Daniels comments regarding 3rd look procedures and adhesions caused by their “Abdolift®!” (This is so disturbing to IHRT because it appears that not even the “SprayGel” adhesion barrier is effective on this type of adhesions, and we KNOW that SprayGel is one of the most effective adhesion barriers ever developed, but not in Daniel adhesiolysis procedures!
Based on everthing we have read, and what Helen has brought to our attention, IHRT can only conclude that the adhesiolysis procedure performed at Endogyn does NOT benefit an ARD patient by use of either the “Abdolift®” OR “Sprygel, so save your money, time and energy going to Endogyn, as it offers less then more for persons afflicted with ARD!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here are some of the concerns IHRT will bring up to KARL STORZ Co:
1.) How would an ARD patient going to Endogn know if a “4th” surgery would be necessary if the ““Abdolift®” causes adhesions in the 2nd, and now a 3rd look, and
2.) Do I think that the ““Abdolift®” undermines the “gasless” part of the adhesiolysis from being as successful and necessary as the surgeon there states it is?
3.) How can the adhesiolysis with the “Abdolift®” be better for an ARD patient if it causes adhesions?
4.) What makes this surgery in Germany better then any adhesiolysis here in the USA if the “Spraygel” is as ineffective as this surgeon at Endogyn states it is when used with gas, yet there were a lot of adhesions in the second and third looks from his surgery with the “Abdolift®!”
5.) What would the reason be for an ARD patient to go there (Endogyn) if they have to go back that far again and again when your being told that a “Abdolift®” gasless surgery with “Spraygel” isn’t as successful as once thought?
6.) It is so confusing to see these pictures and read that the “Abdolift®” gasless procedure is the best, yet I see all those adhesions in his pictures and he says they are from 2nd, & 3rd looks from his procedure, what is the truth? Of course, pictures are truth, but why would he keep using that “hook” when he knows it causes adhesions?
7.) Why doesn’t Storz have any information regarding adhesions and the “Abdolift®!”
8.) Why isn’t the “Spraygel” working in Dr. Kruschinski's gasless surgery?
Bev concedes to an ill "Karen Steward" but will never concede to fighting injustices in the world of ARD!
With that said, I think that have finally figured Karen Stewards posting behaviors out and will share one last item about her that I now find facinating, and realize that she indeed has a problem in which she cannot be held accountable for her actions!
What is a Troll? 3/3/06
http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm
Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or otherwise). You cannot negotiate with them; you cannot cause them to feel shame or compassion; you cannot reason with them. They cannot be made to feel remorse. For some reason, trolls do not feel they are bound by the rules of courtesy or social responsibility.>
"Internet Trolling"
I remember how someone called Karen Steward a "Troll" and when it was described in the IAS, it fit Karen's behavior perfectly! It took until this "episode" for me to realize that we have a repeat scenario here, and I have not been the only one "provoked" into action by Karen over the years.
Over these years, I have watched Karen “react” and “over-react” many times while posting in various web sites associated with ARD. Many times Karen would get absolutely irate at people, no, not only at me, in fact, I was the least of those who were dealt her wrath!
If people did not agree with her or if people asked certain questions regarding Endogyn, be those questions posed to her or not, she responded, and if the questions were not to her liking, watch out! I think the worse reaction from her that were really “over the top” of being rational, was when anyone mentioned the name of any other surgeons when it came to adhesions, whew, would she go off on them big time! Unmerciful is an adequate description of the later behavior!
Over time, Karen was asked to stop posting on both the IAS and on Bombobeach as she was aggressive, abusive, challenging, pushy, and seemed to always be filled with anger. Karen was demanding of total attention to her every post and heaven forbid, if you dared question HER opinions, she blew up at you, disregarding that the other person was ill and deserved respect to make their own opinions heard.
Once Karen started posting in Endogyn, she would find a way to post in other web sites, and initiate nasty posts against others to illicit a reaction, a “response” to the post! Using “anonymous” as her posting signature, Karen may have thought no one would figure out who was doing the dastardly deeds, however, with web site “stat counters,” it is easy to hone in on who posts where and at what times, thus it has never been a “secret” to me, and others, as to who “anonymous” was, or is. The recent post about me posted in IHRT from “anonymous” was from Karen Steward!
There was no reason for such a post, and there are enough of you who read this stuff to know my words here are true! I have not been posting in the public ARD circuit for a long, long time, so there was no reason for such a nasty accusatory post by her…well, no reason that any of us would think! Well, I know think that I do know the reason Karen instigates things on the Internet…so here goes!
You see what a “troll” gets our of doing these types of posts, they get a power rush from them, they feel control, and they generate LOTS of attention. When someone is provoked by nasty words, they usually react and respond, boy, I bit, but then again, I am human and wouldn’t come out to defend themselves? Now I know better after realizing that this scene with Karen has played out before, and more then once, and not only with me.
Remember the summer of 2003, when Karen had so many people all caught up in the “ Endogyn War” of Internet posts? I was really ignorant to what was going on until one day I discovered Karen, and others, posting on two and three different ARD web sites, two and three different presentations regarding their surgeries at Endogyn. Then I discovered that Karen was sending emails about, “ME” all over the place, some were even created to appear that I wrote them, but everything Karen did back then was bogus and provoked to get others all riled up and angry at each other, and it worked! It tore the IAS apart, and darn near knocked bombobeach right into the ocean! Pretty powerful, and Karen was at that time. I mean, how many of us would have ever known someone would be like this, certainly not me!
Like we are seeing in this recent scenario with Karen, she instigated us on IHRT, then when we responded, she quickly moved into the battle mode, not taking offense to anything we came back with, but rather defending Daniel and Endgyn as if we started it. She immediately was able to make herself appear stricken, offended, injured and of course, angry, AT US! She turned the focus off the main issue of her offensive post on IHRT and instead, attempted to put the focus on us as the perpetrators, and the more we reacted, the more she responded in a saintly, playful way condemning our behaviors as “vile, despicable, evil, sewer crawling,” whatever. (Karen’s list of condemning words goes far beyond what my vocabulary allows me to remember.)
Her responses go well beyond normal when she comes to “defending” Daniel, or anything about Endogyn, like she alone has the job of being “protector” of him. This behavior IS not normal given she is a former patients mother. One can be appreciative of something, but, people, come on here, Karen’s behaviors towards Daniel and his surgical procedure are absurd given the not so “positive” circumstances that surround it. Karen’s behaviors are either way up there one minute, or way down there the next, and not very nice either!
Once Karen thinks she has gained enough attention towards, at this time, Dawn and I, then she starts with the “Bible Quotes,” & “philosophical thoughts” that put her in the light of being the one who will rise above all when it comes to dealing with the “culprits” at the time. This behavior confuses those who get caught up in all her anger and accusations on the Internet, as they are privy to ONLY the ones Karen wants them to read, and then they too react against us…however, all it will take is for anyone interested in this behavior pattern that is indicative of Karen Steward behaviors will be to check into the following web links, or to go back and read her behaviors in this current episode of her “trolling,” and you will see it loud and clear!
Karen’s internet behavior is little more then what is called “ Munchausen by Internet,” which is a way to get lots of attention when things are a bit dull or slow in your life, and if your life is the internet, then you shake things up! Perhaps, in Karen’s case, it was to draw attention to her personal cause, in her case, it is in Daniel. It doesn’t matter if that attention is good or bad attention, to the troll, it is all in working the web and those of us who also work within it! Karen has been found out, and I really do think she has some very real emotional/psychological issues, especially since reading things from her past behaviors within the ARD web sites that are NOT associated with me; I am even more convinced of it!
Because of my realization here, I will not hold Karen accountable for anything she has done that involved me, past or current, and I forgive her. I also will not continue to “pounce” on others due to her inciting attention on areas of concern to me, I will not, absolutely not, to the best of my ability, react in a way that will hurt others. This is not to say that I will not pursue concerns about issues I find important enough to get to the bottom of, and I will pursue them diligently, as persons afflicted with ARD have a right to know everything that concerns them and their health intervention, be it at Endogyn or anywhere else!
What I will not pursue are petty issues of anyone’s choice in what they do on Endogyn, as it is not my business, not my call, and no one has to do anything different in the choices they make in their lives, as they alone know the reasons they do what they do. They probably don’t like it that I seek answers, validation and proof of things there, so be it, it is what I believe is important to do for those afflicted with ARD, you do your thing, I do mine, no big deal.
Karen, you did open doors at Endogyn that now need to be scrutinized, and we will do that, but now we do that with full understanding that you wil continue to post retaliatory words , and even in that, we understand. You have our permission if it helps you feel better, dear.
3/3/06
Message to Helen Dynda from Bev…
These words are to Helen Dynda, whom has taken some hard knocks during this current “episode” that Karen instigated, and more where in the making until I realized what was happening here! Thank-God, more words were not expressed where they were not deserved, and I almost did that to you Helen! Helen, when you do post something like the “credentials” of Daniel, be careful and know what your doing, or things like that will be challenged, and why wouldn’t they be, and nothing against you other then that you posted something that was not valid. Helen, do what you do best, educate those afflicted with ARD..as in that, you seem to posses a gift, please do what it best for all of us, you included. Draw your lines over there and stay clear of the dirty stuff, it just is NOT you to be a part of that kind of stuff!
To be honest, Helen, I cannot understand why you remain in Endogyn knowing that it is adverse to a Christian format, maybe your there so that there does exist an element of our Lords “love and gentleness” so that prospective patients, past patients and even Daniel himself, is touched by it through you! This is not my business, but I wanted to share that with you! Please know that I will never approach that about you again.
The exhausting thing about Endogyn, in my opinion, is that there exists a “circus” like atmosphere that is so strong on advertising these surgeries, and blind siding them from seeing what *is going on there, like not so good outcomes with “SprayGel” due to the “Abdolift” hook and far to many return trips per patient! So much “revving” up patients to go there,
That they are not able to see all the “confusion and changes and sadness!” You know, if there have been positive outcomes, they are shadowed by Karen’s’ “revival” like behaviors, which are not very conducive to selling Daniels web site, let alone his surgeries. Too “over the top” for the most part, at least for me she is. I remain well after my adhesiolysis with D, Reich, and yes, in the USA without “Spraygel” but you have never, or will you ever, see me dishing it out to patients to go to him like is done at Endogyn. You know that to be the truth, Helen, I never did that and never will. You know I do not accept anything from anyone who I assist, when I assist them, which is few and far between these days. You, above anyone, that I have never professed to know it all, make claims of being a Dr. or any of the other trash Karen throws my way, yet your silence of that behavior by her, being associated with her in Endgyn, only stand to back her up in all of her words of me. I ask you why you say nothing of which is the truth? This I will always wonder about you, Helen, is it fear of rejection from Daniel? Do you believe her words of me perhaps? Is silence easier to live with then to face Karen’s wrath? Does it “feel” right inside when you say nothing against her lies of others?
I do wonder these things at times, but then I realize, it doesn’t matter to me so much as I will not allow what I believe to be important in this world to do, and in that, at times it is to challenge wrongs done against Gods people, and I will stand for what is right, and at all costs to my reputation!
Karen’s “Trolling”
June 27, 2003: Karen trolling the IAS! “I don't mean to post anything to "disturb" anyone........I am not attacking Korell or demanding that everyone choose Kruschinski............it is only important that all people reading the site have all the information they can possibly have before they CHOOSE a surgeon.”
June 27, 2003: Bev, I forgot that YOU were the divine authority on Germany, Dr. Korell, thing there is to know about of it. Thanks for the reminder! Karen
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0286.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0301.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0335.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0336.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0313.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0321.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0329.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0331.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0319.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0322.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0301/0809.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0301/0794.html- “Karen knows what a “smoke-screen” is
What is a Troll? 3/3/06
http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm
Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or otherwise). You cannot negotiate with them; you cannot cause them to feel shame or compassion; you cannot reason with them. They cannot be made to feel remorse. For some reason, trolls do not feel they are bound by the rules of courtesy or social responsibility.>
"Internet Trolling"
I remember how someone called Karen Steward a "Troll" and when it was described in the IAS, it fit Karen's behavior perfectly! It took until this "episode" for me to realize that we have a repeat scenario here, and I have not been the only one "provoked" into action by Karen over the years.
Over these years, I have watched Karen “react” and “over-react” many times while posting in various web sites associated with ARD. Many times Karen would get absolutely irate at people, no, not only at me, in fact, I was the least of those who were dealt her wrath!
If people did not agree with her or if people asked certain questions regarding Endogyn, be those questions posed to her or not, she responded, and if the questions were not to her liking, watch out! I think the worse reaction from her that were really “over the top” of being rational, was when anyone mentioned the name of any other surgeons when it came to adhesions, whew, would she go off on them big time! Unmerciful is an adequate description of the later behavior!
Over time, Karen was asked to stop posting on both the IAS and on Bombobeach as she was aggressive, abusive, challenging, pushy, and seemed to always be filled with anger. Karen was demanding of total attention to her every post and heaven forbid, if you dared question HER opinions, she blew up at you, disregarding that the other person was ill and deserved respect to make their own opinions heard.
Once Karen started posting in Endogyn, she would find a way to post in other web sites, and initiate nasty posts against others to illicit a reaction, a “response” to the post! Using “anonymous” as her posting signature, Karen may have thought no one would figure out who was doing the dastardly deeds, however, with web site “stat counters,” it is easy to hone in on who posts where and at what times, thus it has never been a “secret” to me, and others, as to who “anonymous” was, or is. The recent post about me posted in IHRT from “anonymous” was from Karen Steward!
There was no reason for such a post, and there are enough of you who read this stuff to know my words here are true! I have not been posting in the public ARD circuit for a long, long time, so there was no reason for such a nasty accusatory post by her…well, no reason that any of us would think! Well, I know think that I do know the reason Karen instigates things on the Internet…so here goes!
You see what a “troll” gets our of doing these types of posts, they get a power rush from them, they feel control, and they generate LOTS of attention. When someone is provoked by nasty words, they usually react and respond, boy, I bit, but then again, I am human and wouldn’t come out to defend themselves? Now I know better after realizing that this scene with Karen has played out before, and more then once, and not only with me.
Remember the summer of 2003, when Karen had so many people all caught up in the “ Endogyn War” of Internet posts? I was really ignorant to what was going on until one day I discovered Karen, and others, posting on two and three different ARD web sites, two and three different presentations regarding their surgeries at Endogyn. Then I discovered that Karen was sending emails about, “ME” all over the place, some were even created to appear that I wrote them, but everything Karen did back then was bogus and provoked to get others all riled up and angry at each other, and it worked! It tore the IAS apart, and darn near knocked bombobeach right into the ocean! Pretty powerful, and Karen was at that time. I mean, how many of us would have ever known someone would be like this, certainly not me!
Like we are seeing in this recent scenario with Karen, she instigated us on IHRT, then when we responded, she quickly moved into the battle mode, not taking offense to anything we came back with, but rather defending Daniel and Endgyn as if we started it. She immediately was able to make herself appear stricken, offended, injured and of course, angry, AT US! She turned the focus off the main issue of her offensive post on IHRT and instead, attempted to put the focus on us as the perpetrators, and the more we reacted, the more she responded in a saintly, playful way condemning our behaviors as “vile, despicable, evil, sewer crawling,” whatever. (Karen’s list of condemning words goes far beyond what my vocabulary allows me to remember.)
Her responses go well beyond normal when she comes to “defending” Daniel, or anything about Endogyn, like she alone has the job of being “protector” of him. This behavior IS not normal given she is a former patients mother. One can be appreciative of something, but, people, come on here, Karen’s behaviors towards Daniel and his surgical procedure are absurd given the not so “positive” circumstances that surround it. Karen’s behaviors are either way up there one minute, or way down there the next, and not very nice either!
Once Karen thinks she has gained enough attention towards, at this time, Dawn and I, then she starts with the “Bible Quotes,” & “philosophical thoughts” that put her in the light of being the one who will rise above all when it comes to dealing with the “culprits” at the time. This behavior confuses those who get caught up in all her anger and accusations on the Internet, as they are privy to ONLY the ones Karen wants them to read, and then they too react against us…however, all it will take is for anyone interested in this behavior pattern that is indicative of Karen Steward behaviors will be to check into the following web links, or to go back and read her behaviors in this current episode of her “trolling,” and you will see it loud and clear!
Karen’s internet behavior is little more then what is called “ Munchausen by Internet,” which is a way to get lots of attention when things are a bit dull or slow in your life, and if your life is the internet, then you shake things up! Perhaps, in Karen’s case, it was to draw attention to her personal cause, in her case, it is in Daniel. It doesn’t matter if that attention is good or bad attention, to the troll, it is all in working the web and those of us who also work within it! Karen has been found out, and I really do think she has some very real emotional/psychological issues, especially since reading things from her past behaviors within the ARD web sites that are NOT associated with me; I am even more convinced of it!
Because of my realization here, I will not hold Karen accountable for anything she has done that involved me, past or current, and I forgive her. I also will not continue to “pounce” on others due to her inciting attention on areas of concern to me, I will not, absolutely not, to the best of my ability, react in a way that will hurt others. This is not to say that I will not pursue concerns about issues I find important enough to get to the bottom of, and I will pursue them diligently, as persons afflicted with ARD have a right to know everything that concerns them and their health intervention, be it at Endogyn or anywhere else!
What I will not pursue are petty issues of anyone’s choice in what they do on Endogyn, as it is not my business, not my call, and no one has to do anything different in the choices they make in their lives, as they alone know the reasons they do what they do. They probably don’t like it that I seek answers, validation and proof of things there, so be it, it is what I believe is important to do for those afflicted with ARD, you do your thing, I do mine, no big deal.
Karen, you did open doors at Endogyn that now need to be scrutinized, and we will do that, but now we do that with full understanding that you wil continue to post retaliatory words , and even in that, we understand. You have our permission if it helps you feel better, dear.
3/3/06
Message to Helen Dynda from Bev…
These words are to Helen Dynda, whom has taken some hard knocks during this current “episode” that Karen instigated, and more where in the making until I realized what was happening here! Thank-God, more words were not expressed where they were not deserved, and I almost did that to you Helen! Helen, when you do post something like the “credentials” of Daniel, be careful and know what your doing, or things like that will be challenged, and why wouldn’t they be, and nothing against you other then that you posted something that was not valid. Helen, do what you do best, educate those afflicted with ARD..as in that, you seem to posses a gift, please do what it best for all of us, you included. Draw your lines over there and stay clear of the dirty stuff, it just is NOT you to be a part of that kind of stuff!
To be honest, Helen, I cannot understand why you remain in Endogyn knowing that it is adverse to a Christian format, maybe your there so that there does exist an element of our Lords “love and gentleness” so that prospective patients, past patients and even Daniel himself, is touched by it through you! This is not my business, but I wanted to share that with you! Please know that I will never approach that about you again.
The exhausting thing about Endogyn, in my opinion, is that there exists a “circus” like atmosphere that is so strong on advertising these surgeries, and blind siding them from seeing what *is going on there, like not so good outcomes with “SprayGel” due to the “Abdolift” hook and far to many return trips per patient! So much “revving” up patients to go there,
That they are not able to see all the “confusion and changes and sadness!” You know, if there have been positive outcomes, they are shadowed by Karen’s’ “revival” like behaviors, which are not very conducive to selling Daniels web site, let alone his surgeries. Too “over the top” for the most part, at least for me she is. I remain well after my adhesiolysis with D, Reich, and yes, in the USA without “Spraygel” but you have never, or will you ever, see me dishing it out to patients to go to him like is done at Endogyn. You know that to be the truth, Helen, I never did that and never will. You know I do not accept anything from anyone who I assist, when I assist them, which is few and far between these days. You, above anyone, that I have never professed to know it all, make claims of being a Dr. or any of the other trash Karen throws my way, yet your silence of that behavior by her, being associated with her in Endgyn, only stand to back her up in all of her words of me. I ask you why you say nothing of which is the truth? This I will always wonder about you, Helen, is it fear of rejection from Daniel? Do you believe her words of me perhaps? Is silence easier to live with then to face Karen’s wrath? Does it “feel” right inside when you say nothing against her lies of others?
I do wonder these things at times, but then I realize, it doesn’t matter to me so much as I will not allow what I believe to be important in this world to do, and in that, at times it is to challenge wrongs done against Gods people, and I will stand for what is right, and at all costs to my reputation!
Karen’s “Trolling”
June 27, 2003: Karen trolling the IAS! “I don't mean to post anything to "disturb" anyone........I am not attacking Korell or demanding that everyone choose Kruschinski............it is only important that all people reading the site have all the information they can possibly have before they CHOOSE a surgeon.”
June 27, 2003: Bev, I forgot that YOU were the divine authority on Germany, Dr. Korell, thing there is to know about of it. Thanks for the reminder! Karen
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0286.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0301.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0335.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0336.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0313.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0321.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0329.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0331.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0319.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0306/0322.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0301/0809.html
http://www.adhesions.org/forums/ADHESIONS.0301/0794.html- “Karen knows what a “smoke-screen” is
Friday, March 03, 2006
Achtung Baby
Whatever Karen Stewart has to say about IHRT, or Dawn and Beverly's tenacity in bringing the issues surrounding Ebdogyn and Daniel Krushinski that have laid dormant for over a year or more, to the forefront now, the ONE thing she is NOT saying is that it was SHE who posted on OUR web site, IHRT, some very nasty and dishonest comments about us. However, once she woke a "sleeping giant" all she could do to back peddle was to start shooting from the hip with anything she could to draw attention from the fact that it was SHE who opened the door when her comments were definitely not solicited by anything we had done or said!
All in all, what she did was a good thing, as there are so many "Red Flags" that exist in Endogyn and surround Daniel Krushinski, that it was time to make some of them public again!
Posted by Anonymous to Adhesion Related Disorder International Human Rights Team IHRT at 2/21/2006 11:42:42 AM
Beverly D. seems to deem herself a doctor. She does a disservice to people suffering by sticking her nose where it doesn't belong. It appears that the German doctor is getting ahead of Reich and this doesn't settle well with Beverly. Or perhaps money is involved? Money that SHE is missing out on?
http://ihrt.blogspot.com/2006/02/bevs-reply-to-accusations-of-anonymous.html
Though we have never claimed to be "God," we will resurrect the material from a few summers ago in which Karen can been found manipulating, threatening, chastising & name calling, and even being party to a bribe, and all to keep patients quiet about surgeries at Endogyn that went wrong...and a lot of them too! It is time once again to bring up the" Endogyn Cover-up!"
Look to next week for this very important and educating material! Here is a preview of what is to come...
----- Original Message -----
From: Lilylover5555@aol.com
To: Dr.Kruschinski@t-online.de ; olddad66@runestone.net ; lostcst@mcn.org ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Misleading issues on the IAS web site and at Bombobeach web sites
Hello Everyone,
I see that you all received the same email from Daniel. I am deeply disturbed that he portrays me as a stressed out alcoholic that smokes!!!!... nothing could be farther from the truth! I told him he needs to get his facts correct before he says things like that to so many!! I need to clarify that what he says about me, simply IS NOT true!
THE ONLY REASON alcohol was brought up in my situation is because I was told that I had chronic pancreatitis, and we were looking for a cause! I do drink OCCASSIONALLY, if we go out for dinner,I may have a drink or two, sometimes not any. We OCCASSIONALLY "party" with friends when we get together, but I consume no more than 3-4 drinks , sometimes not even that! So yes I do drink alcohol, MAYBE 4-7 drinks a month...I didn't realise this is a factor, and I'm the only one that drinks occassionally!
I have had alot of stress in my life this year, more than usual. I've had problems with my immediate family(son) and my extended family(father) but most of that stress was last fall, some residual I guess, but like everyone else, you learn to deal with it, adjust to the changes and move on...I'm not a complete mess because of the stress in my life...
Yes, I do smoke(i know, shame on me), but is that a factor in adhesion formation???
I was deeply offended by Daniel's portrayal of me, and I want to be sure you all know his opinion is wrong!!!
Thanks for listening,
Lisa
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sun, 20 Jul 2003 23:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
k l wrote:
Hi Dawn....You may have stirred up some ca ca in
the board. AND...thats good. I want to thank
you.We were thinking about taking a 3rd mortgage
out on my home.....and going over there. I have
been yelled at and called names because I said I
was "sick and tired of people shouting from the roof
tops" I have been to to many doctor's to know that
no one has that good of a success rate. My son has
had over 30 surgeries and even with the best in the
world....some surgeries didn't work. I have already
traveled around the world once doing this.It's 4:46
right now and I am up worrying ...and the pain is so
crappy today. But I need some answers. I just
wanted to thank you for being brave....Be ready for
some back lash...I could name...names...but I
wont.Thanks again....this was
perfect...RegardsK
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Posted Saturday, July 19, 2003 @ 12:50 PM
Hi Duane,
it has been a nice time while you were here with Lisa.
I hope god can help me dealing with some of the attitudes of women, not only american women...
Thank you for the post.
Kind regards
Daniel
Posted Saturday, July 19, 2003 @ 11:25 PM
Dear Daniel,
I agree you should not waste your time on a person that shows no respect and slanders your good name!
PS..........Loved your answer to Duane on "AMERICAN" women; brilliant answer from a brilliant man.
[Edit by gingirl on Saturday, July 19, 2003 @ 11:25 PM]
--------------------
Karen
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
#1) Original Message -----
From: Karen Steward
To: Name removed by to protect the innocent
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:31 AM
Subject: Hi
Hi T,
Hope you are still feeling well...........Melissa is doing great.
I need a favor------PLEASE do not repeat what I shared with you
concerning how we were treated by Michaela while we were in
Germany. I should have not told anyone, but Daniel..........it seems
Michaela was having a lot of tough personal problems and her
anger was not intentionally directed at us as I had thought..........
Daniel assured me she did not dislike us, but was going through
difficult personal issues......we were the unlikely recipients of her
difficult issues it seems.
I received a letter from Jenny and she told me you had told
her about our problem............I think it is unfair to Michaela to have
people arriving with a "preconceived" notion of her that is negative.
We have all gone through times of anger and depression and many
times unsuspecting people are the targets. So, I choose to forgive
Michaela and ask that you not tell anyone else what I had told you.
I wrote Jenny and explained to her Michaela was only having some
personal problems while we were there and I think it is has all been
resolved...............anyway, wanted to let you know that anything I said
to you----please do not pass to future patients.........
Thanks,
Karen
(#2) To: Name removed by to protect the innocent
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:32 AM
Subject: hi
Hi
Thanks for the nice reply.....and thanks for understanding
that I needed to tell you not to bring up the Michaela issue.
I promised Daniel a long time back it was forgotten, so
I want that to be true!!
Thanks,
Karen
Karen's Not Off the Hook
Today in Endogyn, we again she Karen doing everything she can to counter some of the information in IHRT, and though we too are very pleased that her daughter can eat, (if she really can as Karen has been known to "embellish" things a great deal) it still ONLY reflects ONE surgery at Endogyn.
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=kjy02nIUMaOm0lM0nW14DYOfPA&forum=2&thread=2259
Karen's daughter's surgery at Endogyn remains one of the very few being claimed a success, and based on her prior surgical history, she had NOT gone through but ONE prior surgery, thus she presented with less of an ARD case as many we see. However, I do want to pint out that even in a case such as this one was, Daniel was not successful in either lying all of Melissa's adhesions in the initial surgery, or he simply created more adhesions with his use of the "Das hook" or was just so sloppy that the Spraygel was not as effective as it would be with some using meticulous hemostasis!
Posted Wednesday, July 30, 2003 @ 06:38 AM
Hi Neil,
I do not have a video of Melissa's surgery with Dr. Kruschinski. I did not request a video. I do
have photos that were provided after her surgery.......however, I do not have them scanned in, and I am sure you have seen many similar photos on web pages...........I can get them scanned and email them to you, if you desire to see them, please let me know......they show the adhesions on the bowel, etc. and then the spray gel area....the second look shows photos of a shiny, healthy looking bowel. Melissa had more surgery on her second look, so there is also a photo of that adhesion and a photo of the area after it was taken down.
--------------------
Karen
http://www.Adhesions.de/db/img/presse/melissa1.PDF
We do not hear from others who are doing as well as Karen claims her daughter is doing, but I think there might be some...and it is these we need to hear about if Daniels claims are to be applauded! (I do have a list of over 150 ARD patients who went to Endogyn, dates of surgery, and almost ALL of them were claimed "cured!")
Let me point out, again, that we still do not see any material substantiating Daniel claims that his patient will eat like, well, Karen's daughter eats, and we still have not seen any "patents," credentials, statistics,...nothing from Daniel that would tell us that he is in fact educated in the areas of medicine he claims that he is, that he is in fact have success in his adhesiolysis procedure, and that he is in fact a "plastic surgeon" as he also claims himself to be.
For me, though, even if he did come through with these things, or his " material mocking our faith" is removed, we still know that he ridiculed our Lord in a public way, and not as bad as that, but of equal importance to me is the pictures of adhesions on his site that are created by his "Hook!" In this alone, we hear him state a patient has a darn good chance of 2, 3, & 4 repeat visits to Endogyn!
Though I would like to be able to say that this is all the time I will take for Karen's posts, it probably won't be as long as she writes stuff that needs attention or clarification, then I will do that, as it appears to me that Karen Steward has a psychological problem that is very real, and she might not really be in control of what she is doing to all of us! I will touch on this subject in a following post, but I do find it rather fascinating, as her behavior in all these postings parallel " Munchausen By Internet!" It is my intention to put the focus right where it needs to be for the moment, and that is on, "Karen Steward."
Please watch for my post called, "Internet Trolling"
I remember how someone called her a "Troll" and when it was described in the IAS, it fit Karen's behavior perfectly! It took until this "episode" for me to realize that we have a repeat scenario here, and I have not been the only one "provoked" into action by Karen over the years.
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=kjy02nIUMaOm0lM0nW14DYOfPA&forum=2&thread=2259
Karen's daughter's surgery at Endogyn remains one of the very few being claimed a success, and based on her prior surgical history, she had NOT gone through but ONE prior surgery, thus she presented with less of an ARD case as many we see. However, I do want to pint out that even in a case such as this one was, Daniel was not successful in either lying all of Melissa's adhesions in the initial surgery, or he simply created more adhesions with his use of the "Das hook" or was just so sloppy that the Spraygel was not as effective as it would be with some using meticulous hemostasis!
Posted Wednesday, July 30, 2003 @ 06:38 AM
Hi Neil,
I do not have a video of Melissa's surgery with Dr. Kruschinski. I did not request a video. I do
have photos that were provided after her surgery.......however, I do not have them scanned in, and I am sure you have seen many similar photos on web pages...........I can get them scanned and email them to you, if you desire to see them, please let me know......they show the adhesions on the bowel, etc. and then the spray gel area....the second look shows photos of a shiny, healthy looking bowel. Melissa had more surgery on her second look, so there is also a photo of that adhesion and a photo of the area after it was taken down.
--------------------
Karen
http://www.Adhesions.de/db/img/presse/melissa1.PDF
We do not hear from others who are doing as well as Karen claims her daughter is doing, but I think there might be some...and it is these we need to hear about if Daniels claims are to be applauded! (I do have a list of over 150 ARD patients who went to Endogyn, dates of surgery, and almost ALL of them were claimed "cured!")
Let me point out, again, that we still do not see any material substantiating Daniel claims that his patient will eat like, well, Karen's daughter eats, and we still have not seen any "patents," credentials, statistics,...nothing from Daniel that would tell us that he is in fact educated in the areas of medicine he claims that he is, that he is in fact have success in his adhesiolysis procedure, and that he is in fact a "plastic surgeon" as he also claims himself to be.
For me, though, even if he did come through with these things, or his " material mocking our faith" is removed, we still know that he ridiculed our Lord in a public way, and not as bad as that, but of equal importance to me is the pictures of adhesions on his site that are created by his "Hook!" In this alone, we hear him state a patient has a darn good chance of 2, 3, & 4 repeat visits to Endogyn!
Though I would like to be able to say that this is all the time I will take for Karen's posts, it probably won't be as long as she writes stuff that needs attention or clarification, then I will do that, as it appears to me that Karen Steward has a psychological problem that is very real, and she might not really be in control of what she is doing to all of us! I will touch on this subject in a following post, but I do find it rather fascinating, as her behavior in all these postings parallel " Munchausen By Internet!" It is my intention to put the focus right where it needs to be for the moment, and that is on, "Karen Steward."
Please watch for my post called, "Internet Trolling"
I remember how someone called her a "Troll" and when it was described in the IAS, it fit Karen's behavior perfectly! It took until this "episode" for me to realize that we have a repeat scenario here, and I have not been the only one "provoked" into action by Karen over the years.
Thursday, March 02, 2006
Golem and his Shabbat Goy
Mysteries of "Endogyn" reveled! ( By: Beverly J. Doucette & Dawn Rose 2/29/06)
The "why's of everything" that occurs surrounding "Endogyn" reveled, and in absolute truth!
Daniel Kruschinski finally gives up the answers and in his own words!
The answers to the following behaviors witnessed out of "Endogyn" and ascribed to this one man will all be explained at the end of this post! (PLEASE!! Proceed with caution as this is NOT just another "issue" regarding Daniel Krucshinski, but rather one of the most reveling bits of information about him that outweighs any credentials, success or "inventions" he claims to have. ( As a matter of fact, it outweighs anything he claims or could claim about himself!)
Today, stands out as the most sad and heart retching day we have had here in IHRT! Realization hit Dawn and Beverly right between the eyes after we saw information located in the Endogyn web site that was brought to our attention yesterday!
When we scrolled down to the area of concern in the "Endogyn" web site, we were shocked, absolutely horrified at what we encountered there, and nothing really prepared us for it, yet, when we saw and read Daniels own words, we realized that we had our answer to the many things that seem to surround this surgeon when it comes to his interactions with persons afflicted with ARD!
We also realized that of ALL the surgeons throughout the world, that we are aware of, who present via a website to advertise themselves in the world of ARD, this website presentation is the worse thing we have ever encountered!
Many of Daniels patient interactions are aggressive and controlling, they are pushy at the least, it is easily recognized when he doesn’t want a subject to be on his message board, he simply shuts them down with a few course and firm words. (See below: Daniels Speaks!!! But he doesn’t answer the questions, and Karen cringes at his feet!) Even his "groupies" grovel at his feet like "Golum" of the "Lord of the Ring" movie! (See below: Gollum)
Daniel is known to publicly share some of the most personal information about a patient who is not happy with his surgical outcome, and has no hesitation to try to discredit them as being "drug addicts" "alcoholics," "hypochondriacs" or any other derogatory words he can muster as he tries to overshadow their experiences with his surgery if they are notportrayed by the patient as positive ones, and this is all in the Endogyn web site! (If he removed it from his web site, we have it and will gladly link you to where it remains.)
We find that Daniel, in absence of credentials & validations, instead uses what amounts to bribes to lure patients to surgeries at Endogyn. Visit this website and you will find a select few who post on it who never share credentials or validations of Daniels adhesiolysis, but rather, they embellish his "skills" with banter and chanting to rev up a prospective patient and "smoke screen" them from asking any REAL questions about his skills and surgical outcomes, rather they repeat information surrounding only 1 or 2 surgeries of his, and by creating a circus environment on that message board, these patients are blindsided, and pulled into the circus to such a degree that the truth about the surgeries are never really exposed. (Test this out, if you dare! However, WE can show you how they execute this maneuver!) Another sad truth is that if any of them push for real concrete answers to questions regarding his adhesiolysis or outcomes of the same, they are put down fast, and not just by Daniel, but by these few ladies who always come to his aid, the same ladies over and over again! (Most of whom are not well after their own surgical experiences with him. In fact, even some of these patients have been convinced by him that if they keep coming back to HIM, he will eventually have all the adhesions lysed, except for the ones his "hook" creates, but then again, he is upfront about that!)
(Adhesion Message Board:
"http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=Lhjhvx8A8CmKRsbXBYNESs1s7D&action=&forum=&thread=&user=&query=&msgid=&page=&sort=&do=&key=&others=)
We find Daniel responding to every "prospective" patient with an "eagerness" of enthusiasm and fanaticism of promises, and lots of concern and medical gibberish, at first meeting that is! The more he has the patient in his grip, the more controlling and calculating his emails become! When the patient is so firmly in his grip, he turns nasty, but by then the patients are so fearful of "losing" their only hope of ever getting well, they are stuck, like a fly in the spiders web…only, this web is "Endogyn" and there is more then one fly coming to get them! (Test this out, if you dare! However, WE can show you how they execute this maneuver!)
We also find another VERY disheartening scheme that Daniel uses on his website that "absolutely 100%" NO other surgeon in this world would ever even consider doing when addressing the agony of ARD symptoms shared by those afflicted with it! Daniel uses pictures of food, and lots of it, to lure some of the most desperate and suffering patients into his operating room!
(http://www.adhesions.de/index.php?seite=verw&sprache=en&a=PatientsInfo&b=Picsofsocialevents&c=Foodtest)
This is one of the most despicable and cruel acts ever used to lure patients who cannot eat, from a person within the medical field, we have encountered anywhere in the world! Dawn and I can tell you that his promises of you being able to eat this stuff after HIS adhesiolysis procedure, is NOT the truth, by far! (We have many posts from his patients stating that they are not able to eat like he claimed they would after a surgery with him! Want to see the posts? We have them! Daniel, prove us wrong here with factual validation!)
Though we could go on and on presenting bogus material off of Endogyn’s web site, we will finish today’s message with this message as it is most imperative that we expose the truth of this matter verses what is presented in Daniels web site, which is an "embellishment" of the facts, as ussual!
ANY and ALL claims of clinical studies, experimental procedures or research studies that Daniel claims to have done or be involved in right now, ARE NOT governed by anyone but himself..
(http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/331/7510/178-d)
In fact, Daniel answers to no one but himself, and it is in this truth as shared to the world by HIM on HIS web site, that we now understand what can only be called "unscrupulous behaviors" exhibited by him to persons afflicted with ARD! We are certain this same behavior is exhibited in his behaviors over all as when it is a part of you, you do not change whether your in an operating room with a scaple in your hand, or drinking in a bed with someone other then your wife!!
Remember people, you can hide yourself for a while, but NOT forever! Your the same person no matter where you are and eventually, the REAL you will emerge!
All these "claims" being amde in Endogyn’s wed site are unsubstantiated, not credible, offer no validations, no credentials, material with false claims, pictures of foods are used to torment the hunger of those who cannot eat, traps are set that play on the symptoms of very ill, desperate people, and all meant to lure potential patients to an unproven surgery, to this man, and for these reasons only, "self gain and greed!"
We know this today because Daniel told us, this is because of any surgeon we have ever known in the world of ARD, Daniel HAS no scruples!" All other surgeon we know of have "scruples!" Even if they cannot offer a high quality adhesiolysis, and even if they do make the attempts at it and fail, one thing they do posses that Daniel doesn’t, is the professionalism to keep their religious beliefs, or lack of them private! At least, if these surgeons do not allow Jesus into their operating rooms to guide their hands and give strength and healing to their patients, at least they keep it to themselves!
The answer to everything at Endogyn is in this link!
"We can’t rely on him… LOL"
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=PPhuT1jJNwQuwoh8CT7vJJMCeb&forum=2&thread=873
Though Daniel makes light of our "Lord, Jesus Christ" being present at a surgery with him, for those of us who are Christian and hold in our hearts all the offers of prayers being said for us, and wishes of "God Speed" as we face yet another surgery, it IS a meaningful issue! Our Lord, Jesus, being with us during a surgery IS one of the most important things we have to hold onto when in a surgery, and though we turn to our Lord Jesus in all things, it is in this surgery where we are the most needy of his presence in our lives, as do our loved ones, so far away.
Daniel might find this a joke, and he express’s that he does not have Jesus in his life, which is his prerogative, but to make fun of this and to draw a parrel that Jesus is NOT part of his surgical team because HE doesn’t have Jesus in HIS life, well, this is the ultimate act of egotism and greed we have ever found within the medical community world wide!
We ask you to take a minute when you visit this page in Endogyn, and ask yourself just what IS Daniel saying here? Is he claiming that he alone will make the difference in the outcome of your surgery, and if so, that too okay, however, is he boosting that he is not Christian, is he belittling those of us who are Christian orientated, is a non-Christian less of a human being then HE is as a member of his Jewish faith, and does HE treat a non-Christian patient differently then he treats a Christian patient? And, yes, he would know who was who, as Christians talk freely of their Lord Jesus when facing a surgery!
It is one thing to not be a Christian, which is really neither here or there, unless you MAKE it an issue as Daniel has, however, to discredit our Lord Jesus as being an integral part of a Christians surgery, is just plan wrong, and to do it in such a public and frivolous way it is scary!!
Any surgeon who can post such a thing on his own public web site advertising HIS surgery and at the same time ridicule the Christian faith, lacks true compassion, respect, and professionalism, let alone the decision making qualities necessary when dealing with a human life under anesthetic and his scalpel!
I also want to point out that the "groupies" who lend themselves to Daniels web site not only condone this behavior publicly, as well as compromised themselves as being recognized as reaching out to others with a Christian heart!
It cannot be two ways, either you agree with Daniels bashing of Jesus, or you walk! We will know!
Most important, YOU already know!
But the good news is this,
" No matter where you go, or what you do in your life, as long as YOU have Jesus with you, he IS with you and no one can come between that. Daniel might be able to keep our Lord Jesus out of his heart and surgeries, but he does not posses the power to keep him out of that operating room and surrounding YOU with his love and the prayers of all who are praying for you!"
"Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." - Revelation 3:20
Jesus bashing is simply intolerable, and needs to be taken into consideration when you think about a surgery at Endogyn! Remember this, any understanding of Jesus Christ being an integral part of your life goes out the window the first time you encounter Daniel Krusinski!
Is THIS the surgeon you want operating on you?
" For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God." ROM 10:3
God does not put people on paths, people are given a free will, they make choices, some good, some not so good, but choices, unhindered by even our Lord, but OUR choices just the same! It is sad to read stuff like the this post in Endogyn, where people who believe in Jesus simply put it ALL in his hands thus freeing themselves of all responsibility of what happens to them! In this case, this lady is well on her way to a terrible future, after being lured by false material and claims, she has fallen victim to Daniel and his "groupies!"
What she will have in her favor, and need, is her Lord, that is if she doesn’t place the blame on him instead of her surgeon, where it belongs, however, she did not do her homework effectively prior to going to Endogyn, thus she too is responsible for what is to come! Karen is a tough "spider" to avoid, so "Heart" had a formidable foe on the attack and cannot be blamed for wanting what was offered!
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=HCYcePGBr7Jc1qvEVjL37cMqIi&forum=2&thread=2219
Posted Sunday, February 5, 2006 @ 00:37 AM )
Karen,
I hope this is my aswer, Germany that is, at least he cares and that is so much more than most doctors that I have gone to. I am excited and hope to finalize my trip this week, if money comes in. My son came home from college today and all I could say is I hurt. He said," Wow, mom, can you believe your still in pain?" Everyday I think wow, what happened to me; wish I would have never had a hysterectomy. But I believe GOD has put me on this path, and I believe that I wil find a cure. Thanks for caring.
Warm Regards,
Heart
Daniels Speaks!!!(But he doesn’t answer the questions, and Karen cringes at his feet!)
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=RrBKJviTfhXPx65bW6PPtZPIWg&forum=2&thread=2245
Posted Thursday, February 16, 2006 @ 01:00 PM
HELP Which works best: debit or credit card or Euros. We have been told debit and credit cards are accepted and are the easy way to go and now my daughter heard that they are not accepted and need more Euros that we are taking? What has been the experience of you all out there. Thanks
Posted Friday, February 17, 2006 @ 01:38 AM
my gosh, please relax ...
if we take US$ or travellers cheques, we go to the Internet, take the exchange rate and thats it.
Regarding all the payment, I even dont charge what the bank is charging me for money wire from US to Germany.
We are trying to make it all as convienient as possible to you all...
What is the exact question here ? I dont see the question ?
--------------------
Daniel Kruschinski, MD)
Posted Friday, February 17, 2006 @ 10:29 AM
Dr. Kruschinski, Thanks for the clarification and for your efforts to make the trip as hassle free as possible
(At the request of mmf, and her editing/deleting of previous comments she had made, I have deleted my prior posting which had included her comments.)
[Edit by gingirl on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 @ 12:00 PM]
--------------------
Karen
Gollum is a withered, tortured and wrought wretched ghoulish creature created by the lure of "One Gold Ring!" For us, it is easy to make the comparison of some of Daniels "groupies!" (Those who post continuously chanting their praises for him, as they harvest, ever so diligently, patients for him by using misrepresentations of his skills to lure people to him, as they do it for a few "strokes" from him as it is never done with the use of truth and validations!) http://www.creative-escape.org/gollum/
the following information located in the Endogyn web site was brought to our attention yesterday!
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=PPhuT1jJNwQuwoh8CT7vJJMCeb&forum=2&thread=873
The "why's of everything" that occurs surrounding "Endogyn" reveled, and in absolute truth!
Daniel Kruschinski finally gives up the answers and in his own words!
The answers to the following behaviors witnessed out of "Endogyn" and ascribed to this one man will all be explained at the end of this post! (PLEASE!! Proceed with caution as this is NOT just another "issue" regarding Daniel Krucshinski, but rather one of the most reveling bits of information about him that outweighs any credentials, success or "inventions" he claims to have. ( As a matter of fact, it outweighs anything he claims or could claim about himself!)
Today, stands out as the most sad and heart retching day we have had here in IHRT! Realization hit Dawn and Beverly right between the eyes after we saw information located in the Endogyn web site that was brought to our attention yesterday!
When we scrolled down to the area of concern in the "Endogyn" web site, we were shocked, absolutely horrified at what we encountered there, and nothing really prepared us for it, yet, when we saw and read Daniels own words, we realized that we had our answer to the many things that seem to surround this surgeon when it comes to his interactions with persons afflicted with ARD!
We also realized that of ALL the surgeons throughout the world, that we are aware of, who present via a website to advertise themselves in the world of ARD, this website presentation is the worse thing we have ever encountered!
Many of Daniels patient interactions are aggressive and controlling, they are pushy at the least, it is easily recognized when he doesn’t want a subject to be on his message board, he simply shuts them down with a few course and firm words. (See below: Daniels Speaks!!! But he doesn’t answer the questions, and Karen cringes at his feet!) Even his "groupies" grovel at his feet like "Golum" of the "Lord of the Ring" movie! (See below: Gollum)
Daniel is known to publicly share some of the most personal information about a patient who is not happy with his surgical outcome, and has no hesitation to try to discredit them as being "drug addicts" "alcoholics," "hypochondriacs" or any other derogatory words he can muster as he tries to overshadow their experiences with his surgery if they are notportrayed by the patient as positive ones, and this is all in the Endogyn web site! (If he removed it from his web site, we have it and will gladly link you to where it remains.)
We find that Daniel, in absence of credentials & validations, instead uses what amounts to bribes to lure patients to surgeries at Endogyn. Visit this website and you will find a select few who post on it who never share credentials or validations of Daniels adhesiolysis, but rather, they embellish his "skills" with banter and chanting to rev up a prospective patient and "smoke screen" them from asking any REAL questions about his skills and surgical outcomes, rather they repeat information surrounding only 1 or 2 surgeries of his, and by creating a circus environment on that message board, these patients are blindsided, and pulled into the circus to such a degree that the truth about the surgeries are never really exposed. (Test this out, if you dare! However, WE can show you how they execute this maneuver!) Another sad truth is that if any of them push for real concrete answers to questions regarding his adhesiolysis or outcomes of the same, they are put down fast, and not just by Daniel, but by these few ladies who always come to his aid, the same ladies over and over again! (Most of whom are not well after their own surgical experiences with him. In fact, even some of these patients have been convinced by him that if they keep coming back to HIM, he will eventually have all the adhesions lysed, except for the ones his "hook" creates, but then again, he is upfront about that!)
(Adhesion Message Board:
"http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=Lhjhvx8A8CmKRsbXBYNESs1s7D&action=&forum=&thread=&user=&query=&msgid=&page=&sort=&do=&key=&others=)
We find Daniel responding to every "prospective" patient with an "eagerness" of enthusiasm and fanaticism of promises, and lots of concern and medical gibberish, at first meeting that is! The more he has the patient in his grip, the more controlling and calculating his emails become! When the patient is so firmly in his grip, he turns nasty, but by then the patients are so fearful of "losing" their only hope of ever getting well, they are stuck, like a fly in the spiders web…only, this web is "Endogyn" and there is more then one fly coming to get them! (Test this out, if you dare! However, WE can show you how they execute this maneuver!)
We also find another VERY disheartening scheme that Daniel uses on his website that "absolutely 100%" NO other surgeon in this world would ever even consider doing when addressing the agony of ARD symptoms shared by those afflicted with it! Daniel uses pictures of food, and lots of it, to lure some of the most desperate and suffering patients into his operating room!
(http://www.adhesions.de/index.php?seite=verw&sprache=en&a=PatientsInfo&b=Picsofsocialevents&c=Foodtest)
This is one of the most despicable and cruel acts ever used to lure patients who cannot eat, from a person within the medical field, we have encountered anywhere in the world! Dawn and I can tell you that his promises of you being able to eat this stuff after HIS adhesiolysis procedure, is NOT the truth, by far! (We have many posts from his patients stating that they are not able to eat like he claimed they would after a surgery with him! Want to see the posts? We have them! Daniel, prove us wrong here with factual validation!)
Though we could go on and on presenting bogus material off of Endogyn’s web site, we will finish today’s message with this message as it is most imperative that we expose the truth of this matter verses what is presented in Daniels web site, which is an "embellishment" of the facts, as ussual!
ANY and ALL claims of clinical studies, experimental procedures or research studies that Daniel claims to have done or be involved in right now, ARE NOT governed by anyone but himself..
(http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/331/7510/178-d)
In fact, Daniel answers to no one but himself, and it is in this truth as shared to the world by HIM on HIS web site, that we now understand what can only be called "unscrupulous behaviors" exhibited by him to persons afflicted with ARD! We are certain this same behavior is exhibited in his behaviors over all as when it is a part of you, you do not change whether your in an operating room with a scaple in your hand, or drinking in a bed with someone other then your wife!!
Remember people, you can hide yourself for a while, but NOT forever! Your the same person no matter where you are and eventually, the REAL you will emerge!
All these "claims" being amde in Endogyn’s wed site are unsubstantiated, not credible, offer no validations, no credentials, material with false claims, pictures of foods are used to torment the hunger of those who cannot eat, traps are set that play on the symptoms of very ill, desperate people, and all meant to lure potential patients to an unproven surgery, to this man, and for these reasons only, "self gain and greed!"
We know this today because Daniel told us, this is because of any surgeon we have ever known in the world of ARD, Daniel HAS no scruples!" All other surgeon we know of have "scruples!" Even if they cannot offer a high quality adhesiolysis, and even if they do make the attempts at it and fail, one thing they do posses that Daniel doesn’t, is the professionalism to keep their religious beliefs, or lack of them private! At least, if these surgeons do not allow Jesus into their operating rooms to guide their hands and give strength and healing to their patients, at least they keep it to themselves!
The answer to everything at Endogyn is in this link!
"We can’t rely on him… LOL"
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=PPhuT1jJNwQuwoh8CT7vJJMCeb&forum=2&thread=873
Though Daniel makes light of our "Lord, Jesus Christ" being present at a surgery with him, for those of us who are Christian and hold in our hearts all the offers of prayers being said for us, and wishes of "God Speed" as we face yet another surgery, it IS a meaningful issue! Our Lord, Jesus, being with us during a surgery IS one of the most important things we have to hold onto when in a surgery, and though we turn to our Lord Jesus in all things, it is in this surgery where we are the most needy of his presence in our lives, as do our loved ones, so far away.
Daniel might find this a joke, and he express’s that he does not have Jesus in his life, which is his prerogative, but to make fun of this and to draw a parrel that Jesus is NOT part of his surgical team because HE doesn’t have Jesus in HIS life, well, this is the ultimate act of egotism and greed we have ever found within the medical community world wide!
We ask you to take a minute when you visit this page in Endogyn, and ask yourself just what IS Daniel saying here? Is he claiming that he alone will make the difference in the outcome of your surgery, and if so, that too okay, however, is he boosting that he is not Christian, is he belittling those of us who are Christian orientated, is a non-Christian less of a human being then HE is as a member of his Jewish faith, and does HE treat a non-Christian patient differently then he treats a Christian patient? And, yes, he would know who was who, as Christians talk freely of their Lord Jesus when facing a surgery!
It is one thing to not be a Christian, which is really neither here or there, unless you MAKE it an issue as Daniel has, however, to discredit our Lord Jesus as being an integral part of a Christians surgery, is just plan wrong, and to do it in such a public and frivolous way it is scary!!
Any surgeon who can post such a thing on his own public web site advertising HIS surgery and at the same time ridicule the Christian faith, lacks true compassion, respect, and professionalism, let alone the decision making qualities necessary when dealing with a human life under anesthetic and his scalpel!
I also want to point out that the "groupies" who lend themselves to Daniels web site not only condone this behavior publicly, as well as compromised themselves as being recognized as reaching out to others with a Christian heart!
It cannot be two ways, either you agree with Daniels bashing of Jesus, or you walk! We will know!
Most important, YOU already know!
But the good news is this,
" No matter where you go, or what you do in your life, as long as YOU have Jesus with you, he IS with you and no one can come between that. Daniel might be able to keep our Lord Jesus out of his heart and surgeries, but he does not posses the power to keep him out of that operating room and surrounding YOU with his love and the prayers of all who are praying for you!"
"Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." - Revelation 3:20
Jesus bashing is simply intolerable, and needs to be taken into consideration when you think about a surgery at Endogyn! Remember this, any understanding of Jesus Christ being an integral part of your life goes out the window the first time you encounter Daniel Krusinski!
Is THIS the surgeon you want operating on you?
" For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God." ROM 10:3
God does not put people on paths, people are given a free will, they make choices, some good, some not so good, but choices, unhindered by even our Lord, but OUR choices just the same! It is sad to read stuff like the this post in Endogyn, where people who believe in Jesus simply put it ALL in his hands thus freeing themselves of all responsibility of what happens to them! In this case, this lady is well on her way to a terrible future, after being lured by false material and claims, she has fallen victim to Daniel and his "groupies!"
What she will have in her favor, and need, is her Lord, that is if she doesn’t place the blame on him instead of her surgeon, where it belongs, however, she did not do her homework effectively prior to going to Endogyn, thus she too is responsible for what is to come! Karen is a tough "spider" to avoid, so "Heart" had a formidable foe on the attack and cannot be blamed for wanting what was offered!
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=HCYcePGBr7Jc1qvEVjL37cMqIi&forum=2&thread=2219
Posted Sunday, February 5, 2006 @ 00:37 AM )
Karen,
I hope this is my aswer, Germany that is, at least he cares and that is so much more than most doctors that I have gone to. I am excited and hope to finalize my trip this week, if money comes in. My son came home from college today and all I could say is I hurt. He said," Wow, mom, can you believe your still in pain?" Everyday I think wow, what happened to me; wish I would have never had a hysterectomy. But I believe GOD has put me on this path, and I believe that I wil find a cure. Thanks for caring.
Warm Regards,
Heart
Daniels Speaks!!!(But he doesn’t answer the questions, and Karen cringes at his feet!)
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=RrBKJviTfhXPx65bW6PPtZPIWg&forum=2&thread=2245
Posted Thursday, February 16, 2006 @ 01:00 PM
HELP Which works best: debit or credit card or Euros. We have been told debit and credit cards are accepted and are the easy way to go and now my daughter heard that they are not accepted and need more Euros that we are taking? What has been the experience of you all out there. Thanks
Posted Friday, February 17, 2006 @ 01:38 AM
my gosh, please relax ...
if we take US$ or travellers cheques, we go to the Internet, take the exchange rate and thats it.
Regarding all the payment, I even dont charge what the bank is charging me for money wire from US to Germany.
We are trying to make it all as convienient as possible to you all...
What is the exact question here ? I dont see the question ?
--------------------
Daniel Kruschinski, MD)
Posted Friday, February 17, 2006 @ 10:29 AM
Dr. Kruschinski, Thanks for the clarification and for your efforts to make the trip as hassle free as possible
(At the request of mmf, and her editing/deleting of previous comments she had made, I have deleted my prior posting which had included her comments.)
[Edit by gingirl on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 @ 12:00 PM]
--------------------
Karen
Gollum is a withered, tortured and wrought wretched ghoulish creature created by the lure of "One Gold Ring!" For us, it is easy to make the comparison of some of Daniels "groupies!" (Those who post continuously chanting their praises for him, as they harvest, ever so diligently, patients for him by using misrepresentations of his skills to lure people to him, as they do it for a few "strokes" from him as it is never done with the use of truth and validations!) http://www.creative-escape.org/gollum/
the following information located in the Endogyn web site was brought to our attention yesterday!
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=PPhuT1jJNwQuwoh8CT7vJJMCeb&forum=2&thread=873
The German Patent office
Here is the german patent office.
http://www.dpma.de/index.htm
Search all you want as Daniel has invented nothing but a trap for adhesion sufferers.
Search for inventor Kruschinski or the alternative spelling of his name he uses,
D. Kruczynski.
Daniels duped us again! He never in print says he invented gasless laparoscopy but lets YOU say it to others.......
If I am wrong please shown me! Validation Please!
I found these guys.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Title: US5415160: Surgical lift method and apparatus
[ Derwent Title ]
Country: US United States of America
Inventor: Ortiz, Mark S.; Milford, OH
Failla, Stephen J.; Cincinnati, OH
Kinet, Jean-Pierre; Ulzburg, Germany
Marie, Frederic; Guise, France
Assignee: Ethicon, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
other patents from ETHICON, INC. (182890) (approx. 1,064)
News, Profiles, Stocks and More about this company
Published / Filed: 1995-05-16 / 1994-03-15
Application Number: US1994000213145
IPC Code: Advanced: A61B 17/02; A61B 17/30; A61B 17/34; A61B 17/44;
Core: A61B 17/42; more...
IPC-7: A61B 17/02;
ECLA Code: A61B17/02L; A61B17/44B;
U.S. Class: Current: 600/230; 005/624; 606/115; 606/149;
Original: 128/020; 606/149; 606/115; 005/624;
Field of Search: 606/219,215,216,119,149 294/64.1,64.3,65,1.1 604/115,186,180 128/020,30.2
Priority Number: 1994-03-15 US1994000213145
Abstract: A method and apparatus for lifting an abdominal wall during laparoscopic diagnostic and surgical procedures. The surgical lift device includes a gripping portion for contacting and holding an external skin surface adjacent the abdominal wall. The gripping portion is selectively detachable from the skin surface. The device further includes a lifting portion that extends outwardly from the gripping portion. In accordance with alternative embodiments, the gripping portion may comprise an adhesive sheet or a suction member and the lifting portion may comprise a wire member or a portion of a hook and loop-type fastener.
http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=US05415160__ registration required!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And these guys
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:1238-41.
[Initial experiences with the modular retraction system (VarioLift) for laparoscopic surgery without pneumoperitoneum]
[Article in German]
Gutt CN, Daume JM, Paolucci V, Encke A.
Klinik fur Allgemeinchirurgie, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universitat, Frankfurt am Main.
The VarioLift system is an alternative method for abdominal wall lifting to create sufficient intra-abdominal space and adequate laparoscopic exposure to the operating field. The installation of a CO2 pneumoperitoneum is not necessary, which means that technical disadvantages, systemic and local physiological effects, or complications related to gas insufflation are not relevant when this method is used. The surgeon is allowed to combine the advantages of endoscopic surgery, such as magnified video-endoscopic visualisation, with well-known open surgical techniques to create a symbiosis of prove methods.
PMID: 9574389 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Surg Endosc. 1997 Aug;11(8):868-74. Related Articles, Links
Systems and instruments for laparoscopic surgery without pneumoperitoneum.
Gutt CN, Daume J, Schaeff B, Paolucci V.
Department of General Surgery, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
The insufflation of carbon dioxide into the peritoneal cavity is a routine technique of abdominal exposure in laparoscopic surgery. Because of adverse physiological effects and technical disadvantages of the pneumoperitoneum, alternative methods of abdominal wall lifting have been explored recently. Two groups of retraction systems exist: intraabdominal lifting and subcutaneous lifting of the abdominal wall. Some systems require additional pneumoperitoneum, because the extent of intraabdominal exposure is not sufficient. Other systems are working completely without gas insufflation. Two systems combine abdominal wall lifting with pressure on the internal organs. Every method allows the use of standard laparoscopic instruments, which originally were designed for a regular pneumoperitoneum. The use of a low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in combination with mechanical augmentation of the peritoneal cavity reduces physiological disadvantages of laparoscopy. But technical advantages, such as combination of laparoscopic and open techniques, can be realized only without gas insufflation. Conventional instruments have been designed to fit the ergonomical needs of isopneumic laparoscopy and to be employed with simple valveless cannulae.
PMID: 9266655 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
http://www.dpma.de/index.htm
Search all you want as Daniel has invented nothing but a trap for adhesion sufferers.
Search for inventor Kruschinski or the alternative spelling of his name he uses,
D. Kruczynski.
Daniels duped us again! He never in print says he invented gasless laparoscopy but lets YOU say it to others.......
If I am wrong please shown me! Validation Please!
I found these guys.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Title: US5415160: Surgical lift method and apparatus
[ Derwent Title ]
Country: US United States of America
Inventor: Ortiz, Mark S.; Milford, OH
Failla, Stephen J.; Cincinnati, OH
Kinet, Jean-Pierre; Ulzburg, Germany
Marie, Frederic; Guise, France
Assignee: Ethicon, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
other patents from ETHICON, INC. (182890) (approx. 1,064)
News, Profiles, Stocks and More about this company
Published / Filed: 1995-05-16 / 1994-03-15
Application Number: US1994000213145
IPC Code: Advanced: A61B 17/02; A61B 17/30; A61B 17/34; A61B 17/44;
Core: A61B 17/42; more...
IPC-7: A61B 17/02;
ECLA Code: A61B17/02L; A61B17/44B;
U.S. Class: Current: 600/230; 005/624; 606/115; 606/149;
Original: 128/020; 606/149; 606/115; 005/624;
Field of Search: 606/219,215,216,119,149 294/64.1,64.3,65,1.1 604/115,186,180 128/020,30.2
Priority Number: 1994-03-15 US1994000213145
Abstract: A method and apparatus for lifting an abdominal wall during laparoscopic diagnostic and surgical procedures. The surgical lift device includes a gripping portion for contacting and holding an external skin surface adjacent the abdominal wall. The gripping portion is selectively detachable from the skin surface. The device further includes a lifting portion that extends outwardly from the gripping portion. In accordance with alternative embodiments, the gripping portion may comprise an adhesive sheet or a suction member and the lifting portion may comprise a wire member or a portion of a hook and loop-type fastener.
http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=US05415160__ registration required!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And these guys
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:1238-41.
[Initial experiences with the modular retraction system (VarioLift) for laparoscopic surgery without pneumoperitoneum]
[Article in German]
Gutt CN, Daume JM, Paolucci V, Encke A.
Klinik fur Allgemeinchirurgie, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universitat, Frankfurt am Main.
The VarioLift system is an alternative method for abdominal wall lifting to create sufficient intra-abdominal space and adequate laparoscopic exposure to the operating field. The installation of a CO2 pneumoperitoneum is not necessary, which means that technical disadvantages, systemic and local physiological effects, or complications related to gas insufflation are not relevant when this method is used. The surgeon is allowed to combine the advantages of endoscopic surgery, such as magnified video-endoscopic visualisation, with well-known open surgical techniques to create a symbiosis of prove methods.
PMID: 9574389 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Surg Endosc. 1997 Aug;11(8):868-74. Related Articles, Links
Systems and instruments for laparoscopic surgery without pneumoperitoneum.
Gutt CN, Daume J, Schaeff B, Paolucci V.
Department of General Surgery, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
The insufflation of carbon dioxide into the peritoneal cavity is a routine technique of abdominal exposure in laparoscopic surgery. Because of adverse physiological effects and technical disadvantages of the pneumoperitoneum, alternative methods of abdominal wall lifting have been explored recently. Two groups of retraction systems exist: intraabdominal lifting and subcutaneous lifting of the abdominal wall. Some systems require additional pneumoperitoneum, because the extent of intraabdominal exposure is not sufficient. Other systems are working completely without gas insufflation. Two systems combine abdominal wall lifting with pressure on the internal organs. Every method allows the use of standard laparoscopic instruments, which originally were designed for a regular pneumoperitoneum. The use of a low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in combination with mechanical augmentation of the peritoneal cavity reduces physiological disadvantages of laparoscopy. But technical advantages, such as combination of laparoscopic and open techniques, can be realized only without gas insufflation. Conventional instruments have been designed to fit the ergonomical needs of isopneumic laparoscopy and to be employed with simple valveless cannulae.
PMID: 9266655 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Not One
There IS NOT one single study, abstract or validation for any of the things expressed in here to be adverse to laporoscopic surgery, NOT ONE!
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en
There IS NOT one single study, abstract or validation for any of the things expressed in here to validate the principles or use of the "Hook" procedure!
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en
This whole thing is an advertisement for Daniel, written by him, for him and all to make money and take advantage of the "non-medical" minds of very desperate and trusting patients!
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en
It is easy to do these kinds of things and deal only with your own ego when you are accountable to no one, especially God!
"No God, no conscience"!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Below find links to his 17 page pdf of all his glories written by himself.
http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:yZ6VCpFo_08J:www.bbraunap.com/doc/doc_download.cfm%3F24E3EB13ADE94CF09184388DCAE17FFC+abdolift&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=20
or if that does not work
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:yZ6VCpFo_08J:www.bbraunap.com/doc/doc_download.cfm%3F24E3EB13ADE94CF09184388DCAE17FFC+abdolift&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=20
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en
There IS NOT one single study, abstract or validation for any of the things expressed in here to validate the principles or use of the "Hook" procedure!
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en
This whole thing is an advertisement for Daniel, written by him, for him and all to make money and take advantage of the "non-medical" minds of very desperate and trusting patients!
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en
It is easy to do these kinds of things and deal only with your own ego when you are accountable to no one, especially God!
"No God, no conscience"!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Below find links to his 17 page pdf of all his glories written by himself.
http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:yZ6VCpFo_08J:www.bbraunap.com/doc/doc_download.cfm%3F24E3EB13ADE94CF09184388DCAE17FFC+abdolift&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=20
or if that does not work
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:yZ6VCpFo_08J:www.bbraunap.com/doc/doc_download.cfm%3F24E3EB13ADE94CF09184388DCAE17FFC+abdolift&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=20
Second Hand Smoke Screen
Written by: Beverly Doucette 3/2/06
Karen’s post is great...a wonderful set-up for our upcoming post! Not fearing "God"??? Who?? Us??
Of course we will be called everything in the book for our words and web sites, however, our words are always validated, and it is in the words of those who are exposed that do them harm, not our words! Does Karen really think that people who read our material, no matter how it is presented, can't figure it all out? Of course they can. They will also fidure out that we are not asking Karen to answer for Daniel, nor Helen, nor any other patient from Endgyn, we are asking Daniel to offer up his credentials! And they will also realize that our questions regarding "Endogyn & Daniel Kruschinski" remain unanswered!
Anyone going into our web sites do not have to read anything they find "uncomfortable," there, free country! Karen claims our web sites are not worthy of anyones attention, and are vile, yet she visits them?? Why? If it upsets her, my goodness, you would think she would stay out of them!! "Hello!"
Daniel has a "knack" for exposing his "real" self, and he accomplishes that using his own words, his public posts to his patients, by certain pictures he puts on his web site and his overall demeanor reeks with greed and egotism, and it is easy to get the impression that he sees himself as the "Savior!" (If this sounds like blasphemy to you and you don't like it, stand by as there IS more to come on that subject!)
Karen is attempting her usual "smoke-screening" efforts so that questions put to Daniel might be forgotten if she can get the focus off that issue and onto her behaviors! She is a pro at this behavior, and she is good at it, but not that good! The "good news" is that Karen always opens the door for us to ask MORE questions regarding Daniels deeds, and we do appreciate her for that. However, all the "smoke-screening" in the world will NOT deter us from: “asking for Daniels OBGYN credentials, we are asking for HIS statistics of how many patients are well after a year, maybe two, how many of his patients ARE actually eating like he claims they will following a surgery with him and we want to know where he secured his education for his claims of being a "reconstructive" surgeon other then for breast implants), and where are those credentials, and where is the patent for HIS claims of inventing HIS "Abdolift?"
A little psychology education here!
(“Smoke-screening" is a behavior exhibited by those who do not want to answer for their behaviors, or in Karen's case, the behaviors of others. Instead of responding to an issue that is not comfortable, and probably true, they start to get angry, call names, shout, use "aggressive" scar tactics, threaten their accusers, and all of this is in an attempt to get the focus OFF the point of the issue being discussed, hoping that the other party will back down and not continue to address the issue at hand, or will just give up trying to address the issue, and walk away, or will break down and run the other way...thus the party being questioned was and never has to respond to take responsibility for the issue(s) that are trying to be resolved!
Other behaviors exhibited by a person NOT wanting to assume responsibility for their actions or be held accountable for them are:
The "Martyr" = I deserve it all, let it all come down on me, I will take it onto myself so other are speared this burden, whoa is me, whoa is me to have to carry this burden for all...
The "Pious"= I thank-the world for everything, and everyone for everything, I am really just a good 'ol timid innocent person doing my best...proclamation of innocence
& The "Poor Me" = " Why me, why me?" "Why does it always have to be put on me?" My whole life is miserable, nothing good happens to me. Then they start crying.
All the behaviors above are an attempt by these people trying to “dodge the bullet” and NOT have to face issues that are uncomfortable for them, or be accountable for behaviors they ARE NOT acceptable , but rather are hurtful to others!)
What we do find interesting in Karen’s post is her “comment” regarding our "suggesting" that her behaviors appears to be indicative of an “alcoholic” and that we took a "cheap shots" at good people,” when Daniel posted HIS impressions of prior patients who were not well following a surgery or 4 by him, on his message board! Daniel, and Karen, posted that these patients were “Alcoholics, Drug Attics, Crazy and Dysfunctional,” but when WE share our opinion in a similar way, WE are evil? WE do not see the evil of OUR ways?? How does she know??
It is also interesting how Karen has now become our judge and jury over God! I think this comes from “having her head stroked” once to often by Daniel! (Referring to the little gif by her name!) So now in Endgyn we have someone who thinks he is the “Savior” AND another who thinks she is “ God!”
Remember her words here quoting the bible in her attempts to discredit our intentions, as you will see them again in IHRT!!
“God is not mocked, what one sows, one reaps, and you have a wicked garden planted across this entire world. You will not continue to stomp on God's people and not suffer the consequences of your actions.
God also uses people to send warning and yet you will laugh and mock Him even while reading this. A wise man heeds warning, but the fool says there is no God.”
gingirl
Master advanced
Gender: Female
Location: Texas
Registered: Jul 2003
Status: Offline
Posts: 480
Posted Thursday, March 2, 2006 @ 02:39 AM
“Like I've said before, you two take "cheap shots" at good people by using the Internet in an evil manner. And you have no fear of God. I truly believe if you both do not see the error of your ways, we will all watch as God destroys you. God is not mocked, what one sows, one reaps, and you have a wicked garden planted across this entire world. You will not continue to stomp on God's people and not suffer the consequences of your actions.
God also uses people to send warning and yet you will laugh and mock Him even while reading this. A wise man heeds warning, but the fool says there is no God.”
--------------------
Karen
Dawn Rose & Beverly Doucette do proclaim the following as a result of Karen’s recent post in Endogyn!
(http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=ATE7fVRjIR5wLVennuiFLeCugD&forum=33&thread=2256)
**We agree that "Snake Pit" could be a fitting description for IHRT, and anyone trying to scam those afflicted with ARD, had better step carefully or they will find themselves in the pit with the rest of the snakes;
** We will continue to work together to bring issues regarding ARD to the public;
**We will continue to ask for Daniel's credentials, and point out how he uses Endogyn as a means to lure desperate people to him for a surgery that offers them nothing more then they can secure in their own home towns;
**We will continue to "blog" and post everything that we find unacceptable and underhanded in the world of "ARD" and we will name names, dates and issues with validations of that material;
**We will let the reader draw their own conclusions regarding material found in our web sites;
**We will continue to all "free" and "unedited" posting in IHRT
**We will not be intimidated by name calling & empty accusations as that is easy to do without having to validate your words, and it is only an opinion. (Usually an opinion of one who had been caught with their hands in the "cookie jar!)
**We will continue to report on everything and anything we can if is involves issues of ARD!
** We will continue to appreciate posts like Karen Stewarts, as they usually open the door to things that need exposing, and without them, we could miss something, not usually, but we could miss something!
**We are certain that there will be more issues arising in the world of ARD that we address in a forthright “in your face” way, so be it!
** We "DO NOT" promote anyone associated with "ENDOGYN or BOMBOBEACH," in fact; we don't even respect them let alone promote them!!
As long as Endogyn give us material that we consider important enough to bring to the public s attention, we will ues it, so stay tuned!
Karen’s post is great...a wonderful set-up for our upcoming post! Not fearing "God"??? Who?? Us??
Of course we will be called everything in the book for our words and web sites, however, our words are always validated, and it is in the words of those who are exposed that do them harm, not our words! Does Karen really think that people who read our material, no matter how it is presented, can't figure it all out? Of course they can. They will also fidure out that we are not asking Karen to answer for Daniel, nor Helen, nor any other patient from Endgyn, we are asking Daniel to offer up his credentials! And they will also realize that our questions regarding "Endogyn & Daniel Kruschinski" remain unanswered!
Anyone going into our web sites do not have to read anything they find "uncomfortable," there, free country! Karen claims our web sites are not worthy of anyones attention, and are vile, yet she visits them?? Why? If it upsets her, my goodness, you would think she would stay out of them!! "Hello!"
Daniel has a "knack" for exposing his "real" self, and he accomplishes that using his own words, his public posts to his patients, by certain pictures he puts on his web site and his overall demeanor reeks with greed and egotism, and it is easy to get the impression that he sees himself as the "Savior!" (If this sounds like blasphemy to you and you don't like it, stand by as there IS more to come on that subject!)
Karen is attempting her usual "smoke-screening" efforts so that questions put to Daniel might be forgotten if she can get the focus off that issue and onto her behaviors! She is a pro at this behavior, and she is good at it, but not that good! The "good news" is that Karen always opens the door for us to ask MORE questions regarding Daniels deeds, and we do appreciate her for that. However, all the "smoke-screening" in the world will NOT deter us from: “asking for Daniels OBGYN credentials, we are asking for HIS statistics of how many patients are well after a year, maybe two, how many of his patients ARE actually eating like he claims they will following a surgery with him and we want to know where he secured his education for his claims of being a "reconstructive" surgeon other then for breast implants), and where are those credentials, and where is the patent for HIS claims of inventing HIS "Abdolift?"
A little psychology education here!
(“Smoke-screening" is a behavior exhibited by those who do not want to answer for their behaviors, or in Karen's case, the behaviors of others. Instead of responding to an issue that is not comfortable, and probably true, they start to get angry, call names, shout, use "aggressive" scar tactics, threaten their accusers, and all of this is in an attempt to get the focus OFF the point of the issue being discussed, hoping that the other party will back down and not continue to address the issue at hand, or will just give up trying to address the issue, and walk away, or will break down and run the other way...thus the party being questioned was and never has to respond to take responsibility for the issue(s) that are trying to be resolved!
Other behaviors exhibited by a person NOT wanting to assume responsibility for their actions or be held accountable for them are:
The "Martyr" = I deserve it all, let it all come down on me, I will take it onto myself so other are speared this burden, whoa is me, whoa is me to have to carry this burden for all...
The "Pious"= I thank-the world for everything, and everyone for everything, I am really just a good 'ol timid innocent person doing my best...proclamation of innocence
& The "Poor Me" = " Why me, why me?" "Why does it always have to be put on me?" My whole life is miserable, nothing good happens to me. Then they start crying.
All the behaviors above are an attempt by these people trying to “dodge the bullet” and NOT have to face issues that are uncomfortable for them, or be accountable for behaviors they ARE NOT acceptable , but rather are hurtful to others!)
What we do find interesting in Karen’s post is her “comment” regarding our "suggesting" that her behaviors appears to be indicative of an “alcoholic” and that we took a "cheap shots" at good people,” when Daniel posted HIS impressions of prior patients who were not well following a surgery or 4 by him, on his message board! Daniel, and Karen, posted that these patients were “Alcoholics, Drug Attics, Crazy and Dysfunctional,” but when WE share our opinion in a similar way, WE are evil? WE do not see the evil of OUR ways?? How does she know??
It is also interesting how Karen has now become our judge and jury over God! I think this comes from “having her head stroked” once to often by Daniel! (Referring to the little gif by her name!) So now in Endgyn we have someone who thinks he is the “Savior” AND another who thinks she is “ God!”
Remember her words here quoting the bible in her attempts to discredit our intentions, as you will see them again in IHRT!!
“God is not mocked, what one sows, one reaps, and you have a wicked garden planted across this entire world. You will not continue to stomp on God's people and not suffer the consequences of your actions.
God also uses people to send warning and yet you will laugh and mock Him even while reading this. A wise man heeds warning, but the fool says there is no God.”
gingirl
Master advanced
Gender: Female
Location: Texas
Registered: Jul 2003
Status: Offline
Posts: 480
Posted Thursday, March 2, 2006 @ 02:39 AM
“Like I've said before, you two take "cheap shots" at good people by using the Internet in an evil manner. And you have no fear of God. I truly believe if you both do not see the error of your ways, we will all watch as God destroys you. God is not mocked, what one sows, one reaps, and you have a wicked garden planted across this entire world. You will not continue to stomp on God's people and not suffer the consequences of your actions.
God also uses people to send warning and yet you will laugh and mock Him even while reading this. A wise man heeds warning, but the fool says there is no God.”
--------------------
Karen
Dawn Rose & Beverly Doucette do proclaim the following as a result of Karen’s recent post in Endogyn!
(http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=ATE7fVRjIR5wLVennuiFLeCugD&forum=33&thread=2256)
**We agree that "Snake Pit" could be a fitting description for IHRT, and anyone trying to scam those afflicted with ARD, had better step carefully or they will find themselves in the pit with the rest of the snakes;
** We will continue to work together to bring issues regarding ARD to the public;
**We will continue to ask for Daniel's credentials, and point out how he uses Endogyn as a means to lure desperate people to him for a surgery that offers them nothing more then they can secure in their own home towns;
**We will continue to "blog" and post everything that we find unacceptable and underhanded in the world of "ARD" and we will name names, dates and issues with validations of that material;
**We will let the reader draw their own conclusions regarding material found in our web sites;
**We will continue to all "free" and "unedited" posting in IHRT
**We will not be intimidated by name calling & empty accusations as that is easy to do without having to validate your words, and it is only an opinion. (Usually an opinion of one who had been caught with their hands in the "cookie jar!)
**We will continue to report on everything and anything we can if is involves issues of ARD!
** We will continue to appreciate posts like Karen Stewarts, as they usually open the door to things that need exposing, and without them, we could miss something, not usually, but we could miss something!
**We are certain that there will be more issues arising in the world of ARD that we address in a forthright “in your face” way, so be it!
** We "DO NOT" promote anyone associated with "ENDOGYN or BOMBOBEACH," in fact; we don't even respect them let alone promote them!!
As long as Endogyn give us material that we consider important enough to bring to the public s attention, we will ues it, so stay tuned!
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Abdominal wall lifting devices
You sure can't find any information about the "Abdolift" on the Karl Storz website.
They really call them:
Abdominal wall lifting devices.
I would highly recommend you get a free subscription, courtesy of Karl Storz, to WebSurg, the e-surgical reference.
On their home page you will see the free registration.
http://www.websurg.com/homepage/index.php
After registration, return to home page
Go to
1st dropdown menu:
Virtual university
Choose equipment
Choose devices
Choose devices again
then scroll down to insulfflators
Oh boy there are some scary consequences revealed to me the patient...
and what is done to compensate for them.
Understand your pneumoperitoneum with this wonderful PowerPoint tutorial.
I was reading the various complications
and while reading about issues of pregnancy and insuflation
I found this most fascinating nugget of fact and one most scathing opinion,
"In our own experience, no significant advantage is offered by such devices."
"Abdominal wall lifting devices:
A number of systems for lifting the abdominal wall are on the market. More th an 10 different systems with intra-abdominal retraction or placement of subcutaneous fixation systems have been invented since 1997. The mechanical portion of the retractor is placed in the abdominal cavity through a 10 mm to 20 mm incision and connected to a system of articulations attached to the operating table. The advantage of these systems is the prevention of complications secondary to excessive intra-abdominal pressure. They also avoid the risk of gas embolism during procedures such as hepatectomy where central venous injury may occur. However, they do have the disadvantage of providing a more limited operative field compared with a conventional pneumoperitoneum. Postoperative pain is the same with both techniques, but operating time is significantly longer. Complete exploration of the operative cavity is not possible with these kinds of retraction devices.
Since the pneumoperitoneum has been implicated in the seeding of cancerous cells to trocar ports, abdominal wall retractors could be of use in preventing such a complication: an experimental study comparing the effects of laparotomy, laparoscopy with insufflation and parietal retraction has demonstrated a lower incidence of seeding with retractor use. This experimental finding has never been confirmed by clinical observation. Indeed the poor exposure obtained with retractors may well lead to inappropriate tumor handling leading to increased risk of intraoperative tumor spread. In our own experience, no significant advantage is offered by such devices."
Why on earth would anyone choose this device to perform adhesiolysis?
"Complete exploration of the operative cavity is not possible with these kinds of retraction devices."
Perhaps because we are the most desparate, vulnerable group of suffering people he could prey upon.
He cannot see all areas needing to be lysed!
No wonder everyone has to go back!
Duh!
Don't feel bad, we were just desparate. We can now be aware and break this viciuos cycle.
He never saw Sally's imflamed appendix?
He never saw mine and Tonya's endo?
Never saw the inflammed gallbladders?
He says it's not his fault as he never saw, didn't want to see, COULD NOT SEE....And he never mentioned that.,,yet he knew.
But happy to take your money for subsequent surgeries! What a financial jackpot!
Ok, lets put some things together. An excruciation by Dawn Rose (smirk)
In the area of adhesiolysis....
thats his way,
with subtle semantics.
Very selective terminology that evolves with each negative situation, for use in future evasion.
Photos, never dvd's or videos.
You only get to see what he wishes shown.
( which god forbid, a video would help another doctor down the road understand what has happened to you,
might save your life in a surgical situation plus I hear that adhesiolysis videos are a real laugh riot with the gang down at Social Security)
The photos he shows of umbilical adhesions at 3rd look.
3rd 4th look and hanging off the Hook Picture from Das Hook aka abdolift
ihrt.blogspot.com/2006/02/3rd-4th-look-and-hanging-off-hook.html
How arrogant!
What fools he has played us for.
Negative attacks in public against patients
Show this post to any Doctor
ihrt.blogspot.com/2006/02/show-this-post-to-any-doctor.html
and pure liar liar pants on fire stuff
Dawn Rose Operative Reports - You decide
http://www.adhesionrelateddisorder.com/Dawn-Rose-Op-Reports.html
Now this one should just terrify us all.
German doctors press for a national trial register
http://adhesion.bravejournal.com/entry/18388
Apparently any one can do any type of trail they like with out letting people know.
Here's an experiment lured in with the promise of Daniel being a plastic surgeon
probably he just wanted to see if he could perform plastic surgery. Um, no he screwed up bad.
Another from endogyn speaks out! Dear Dr. Krusch...
ihrt.blogspot.com/2006/02/another-from-endogyn-speaks-out-dear.html
...and this
Please Help Save Tonya!
Save Tonya. The links below will help you to understand what adhesions really are. Tonya and I were fooled into thinking she was saved, but she is much worse now. ... "From: Tonya Nordquist. To: Dr.Kruschinski@t-online.de. Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 1 ... - Original Message - From: To: "Dan Nordquist"
and here's the other member I could find in Daniel's accolade of:
Board member of the Gasless Laparoscopic & Endoscopic Surgeons Society (GasLESS)
www.chowbey.com
some guy in India that Daniel probably got drunk with....
So have we all been part of Daniel's skewing of the facts because he wants to...
"Actual Project: Franchising endoscopic surgery in gynecology in Germany and other countries."
http://www.obgyn.net/meet.asp?page=/all_advisors/D_Kruschinski
"He developed and designed several abdominal wall-lifting systems, including the recent AbdoLift, a Karl Storz product. Dr. Kruschinski is currently involved in franchising endoscopic gynecologic surgery in Germany and other countries."
From his own CV.
From Daniel in an email to Dawn Rose;
"Dear Dawn,
I'm not angry at you. My vision is that YOU ALL cooperate together and
make my dream come through"
We are nothing more than test burgers for his lucrative vision of McDonald's gynecology.
They really call them:
Abdominal wall lifting devices.
I would highly recommend you get a free subscription, courtesy of Karl Storz, to WebSurg, the e-surgical reference.
On their home page you will see the free registration.
http://www.websurg.com/homepage/index.php
After registration, return to home page
Go to
1st dropdown menu:
Virtual university
Choose equipment
Choose devices
Choose devices again
then scroll down to insulfflators
Oh boy there are some scary consequences revealed to me the patient...
and what is done to compensate for them.
Understand your pneumoperitoneum with this wonderful PowerPoint tutorial.
I was reading the various complications
and while reading about issues of pregnancy and insuflation
I found this most fascinating nugget of fact and one most scathing opinion,
"In our own experience, no significant advantage is offered by such devices."
"Abdominal wall lifting devices:
A number of systems for lifting the abdominal wall are on the market. More th an 10 different systems with intra-abdominal retraction or placement of subcutaneous fixation systems have been invented since 1997. The mechanical portion of the retractor is placed in the abdominal cavity through a 10 mm to 20 mm incision and connected to a system of articulations attached to the operating table. The advantage of these systems is the prevention of complications secondary to excessive intra-abdominal pressure. They also avoid the risk of gas embolism during procedures such as hepatectomy where central venous injury may occur. However, they do have the disadvantage of providing a more limited operative field compared with a conventional pneumoperitoneum. Postoperative pain is the same with both techniques, but operating time is significantly longer. Complete exploration of the operative cavity is not possible with these kinds of retraction devices.
Since the pneumoperitoneum has been implicated in the seeding of cancerous cells to trocar ports, abdominal wall retractors could be of use in preventing such a complication: an experimental study comparing the effects of laparotomy, laparoscopy with insufflation and parietal retraction has demonstrated a lower incidence of seeding with retractor use. This experimental finding has never been confirmed by clinical observation. Indeed the poor exposure obtained with retractors may well lead to inappropriate tumor handling leading to increased risk of intraoperative tumor spread. In our own experience, no significant advantage is offered by such devices."
Why on earth would anyone choose this device to perform adhesiolysis?
"Complete exploration of the operative cavity is not possible with these kinds of retraction devices."
Perhaps because we are the most desparate, vulnerable group of suffering people he could prey upon.
He cannot see all areas needing to be lysed!
No wonder everyone has to go back!
Duh!
Don't feel bad, we were just desparate. We can now be aware and break this viciuos cycle.
He never saw Sally's imflamed appendix?
He never saw mine and Tonya's endo?
Never saw the inflammed gallbladders?
He says it's not his fault as he never saw, didn't want to see, COULD NOT SEE....And he never mentioned that.,,yet he knew.
But happy to take your money for subsequent surgeries! What a financial jackpot!
Ok, lets put some things together. An excruciation by Dawn Rose (smirk)
In the area of adhesiolysis....
thats his way,
with subtle semantics.
Very selective terminology that evolves with each negative situation, for use in future evasion.
Photos, never dvd's or videos.
You only get to see what he wishes shown.
( which god forbid, a video would help another doctor down the road understand what has happened to you,
might save your life in a surgical situation plus I hear that adhesiolysis videos are a real laugh riot with the gang down at Social Security)
The photos he shows of umbilical adhesions at 3rd look.
3rd 4th look and hanging off the Hook Picture from Das Hook aka abdolift
ihrt.blogspot.com/2006/02/3rd-4th-look-and-hanging-off-hook.html
How arrogant!
What fools he has played us for.
Negative attacks in public against patients
Show this post to any Doctor
ihrt.blogspot.com/2006/02/show-this-post-to-any-doctor.html
and pure liar liar pants on fire stuff
Dawn Rose Operative Reports - You decide
http://www.adhesionrelateddisorder.com/Dawn-Rose-Op-Reports.html
Now this one should just terrify us all.
German doctors press for a national trial register
http://adhesion.bravejournal.com/entry/18388
Apparently any one can do any type of trail they like with out letting people know.
Here's an experiment lured in with the promise of Daniel being a plastic surgeon
probably he just wanted to see if he could perform plastic surgery. Um, no he screwed up bad.
Another from endogyn speaks out! Dear Dr. Krusch...
ihrt.blogspot.com/2006/02/another-from-endogyn-speaks-out-dear.html
...and this
Please Help Save Tonya!
Save Tonya. The links below will help you to understand what adhesions really are. Tonya and I were fooled into thinking she was saved, but she is much worse now. ... "From: Tonya Nordquist. To: Dr.Kruschinski@t-online.de. Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 1 ... - Original Message - From:
and here's the other member I could find in Daniel's accolade of:
Board member of the Gasless Laparoscopic & Endoscopic Surgeons Society (GasLESS)
www.chowbey.com
some guy in India that Daniel probably got drunk with....
So have we all been part of Daniel's skewing of the facts because he wants to...
"Actual Project: Franchising endoscopic surgery in gynecology in Germany and other countries."
http://www.obgyn.net/meet.asp?page=/all_advisors/D_Kruschinski
"He developed and designed several abdominal wall-lifting systems, including the recent AbdoLift, a Karl Storz product. Dr. Kruschinski is currently involved in franchising endoscopic gynecologic surgery in Germany and other countries."
From his own CV.
From Daniel in an email to Dawn Rose;
"Dear Dawn,
I'm not angry at you. My vision is that YOU ALL cooperate together and
make my dream come through"
We are nothing more than test burgers for his lucrative vision of McDonald's gynecology.
I am not making this up
"We can't depend on him LOL" - Daneil Kruschinski
No Really....this stuff is on Daniel's website. I am not making this up.
( He lifted this pic from the ISGE and put and Endogyn mark on it)
His own words and pictures and choices.
Check out this one.
Food Test
http://www.adhesions.de/index.php?seite=verw&sprache=en&a=PatientsInfo&b=Picsofsocialevents&c=Foodtest
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)