Dear Dr. Kruschinski,
Interesting post by you on your Endogyn message board today.
We have just a few comments:
1. You state you did not nothing wrong or criminal.
How about the fact that you did RESEARCH on patients, and did not tell them they were in a RESEARCH study, and you did not get their permission to be a research subject?
How can you consider that "not wrong"?
You obviously do not have a code of professional ethics. Your code seems to be "if I can make money, it is OK" .
Until your article was published a few weeks ago, you continued to say "It was not a study. It was not research".
Your patients remember the things you put in writing, and even if you later removed it from your message board, it is all cached.
2. You continue to blame your problems on IHRT, and take no personal responsibility.
How about Ayursan? What happened there? You stated you were doing surgeries there and then suddenly, you were DISMISSED, and you moved on to some other place in Germany. IHRT had nothing to do with you being dismissed from Ayursan.
3. You mention that you invite past patients to complete follow-up questionnaires. That is a good idea, however IHRT has been informed that you do not send these questionnaires to the patients who have told you they had bad results.
Thus, not a valid research tool!
4. Today you blame IHRT as the reason you left Emma Klinik in Selengenstadt.
Have you forgotten that you put in writing on your own message board that you left Emma because you found a place with better standards of care?
Have you forgotten that you stated on your own message board that you can go back to Emma any time you want?
5. And the question that has never been answered......why did you need to have American patients coming to you?
If you are so famous and so brilliant, and so talented, why were there not plenty of European patients with ARD coming to you?
If you are continuing to do surgery in other locations, good luck to your patients, they will need it!
6. And a note to those patients who had good results. Are you aware that numerous pts. who did not get good results , and communcated that to Dr. K or to other people, were sent demeaning and/or threatening e-mails by some of Kru's loyal followers?
Saturday, September 30, 2006
Monday, September 25, 2006
Kruschinski's Meeting Agenda
Daniel Kruschinski's lecturing agenda looks pretty full now that he is no longer associated with the Krankenhaus - Rotthalmuenster - near Passau, and is no longer associated with ANY medical facility to perform surgeries, gasless or otherwise.
(Do not take IHRT's word for this, ask Krankenhaus Rotthalmünster yourself!)
* Simbacher Straße 3594094
* Rotthalmünster Telefon 0 8533 - 99 0 * info@krankenhaus-rotthalmuenster.de
!!!!!!IMPORTANT "Kru" things IHRT is keeping an eye on for you!!!!!!!
Ohhhhh! Ahhhhh!
IHRT is watching for this upcoming meeting where we see Kruschinski scheduled to present on, of all things "Gasless Laporoscopy!"
(These following schedules of Kruschinski's lectures are so ridiculous that IHRT can hardly believe their eyes when they read these things! Either someone is really off base here and lives with their head in the clouds, or they are oblivious to the current "Kru" status within the medical community, such as that he is no longer practicing medicine!
Maybe the organizers of these meetings are just severely behind the times of how much progress is being made for persons afflicted with "Adhesion Related Disorder" but the good news is that WE know the areas in which that is happening and do not have to depend on Doctors for that!
IHRT will help educate them to the "Kru" facts.....
There IS no such procedure as "GasLess" laporoscopy in Kruschinski's current or future practice, as he has no practice, no research, no statistics, no office, no patients, no abdolift, no nothing! "Kru" is a now a nothing, a non-entity, to those who are wise enough to have figured him out!
Maybe one of these organizers should ask Kru where he intends to secure an "abdominal wall lifting system" and how he got his "statistics" for his "gasless research presentations,"
such as experimenting on unsuspecting patients to Endogyn from 2003 - 2006!
"Gasless" laporoscopy is a NON issue, defunct, gone, poof, scrapped & abolished for use in adhesiolysis procedures in progressive countries!
(Unless you are looking to secure this procedure in a country that has no other means to perform a surgery because Co2 is not available!)
So, what is the interest in this subject now? There is no reason at all for this subject to be presented let alone discussed! If this is how these Doctors fill their time at these meetings, it is pretty desperate and they need to turn to real issues with real means of producing on them..unlike anything "Kru" can offer!
COUNT DOWN to PAX meeting..........
7th PAX Meeting
Leuven, Belgium 2006 Sept 28-30
Meeting on "The Peritoneal Cavity Adhesion Formation Tumor Implantation."
Kruschinski is scheduled to present at this meeting on:
Friday 29th of September 2006
Mesh Biology Peritoneal immunology
Session 3 The CO2 pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy
"Gazless laparoscopy Daniel Kruschinski" http://www.gynsurgery.org/pax/meeting/content/mainconf.shtml
Kru is busy in Belgium!
29.236-241-81.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be (Skynet)
Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, 224 returning visits
Date
Time
WebPage
27th September 2006
10:49:15 AM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The ISGE 10th Regional meeting in Beijing, China, Friday September 22nd - 25th Kruschinski is scheduled to present at three different times during this meeting, AND "Kru" is VERY busy surfing the Internet besides....he IS a busy, busy man! Lets take a look!
Here are "Kru's" visits to IHRT.....
(Bj-kunlun-hotel)
Beijing, Beijing, China, 214 returning visits
Date
Time
WebPage
20th September 2006
09:19:27 PM
adhesionrelateddisorder.blogspot.com/ihrt.blogspot.com/
21st September 2006
05:26:46 AM
adhesionrelateddisorder.blogspot.com/ihrt.blogspot.com/
21st September 2006
09:24:37 PM
adhesionrelateddisorder.blogspot.com/ihrt.blogspot.com/
22nd September 2006
04:49:42 AM
adhesionrelateddisorder.blogspot.com/ihrt.blogspot.com/
22nd September 2006
06:36:43 PM
adhesionrelateddisorder.blogspot.com/ihrt.blogspot.com/
23rd September 2006
08:51:47 PM
adhesionrelateddisorder.blogspot.com/ihrt.blogspot.com/
24th September 2006
04:52:05 AM
adhesionrelateddisorder.blogspot.com/ihrt.blogspot.com/
24th September 2006
09:17:56 PM
adhesionrelateddisorder.blogspot.com/ihrt.blogspot.com/
25th September 2006
12:25:40 PM
adhesionrelateddisorder.blogspot.com/ihrt.blogspot.com/
Here are "Kru's" scheduled presentation while in China:
(Though it appears that he spent considerable time in his hotel on the computer!!)
(Also note the Mettler/Kruschinski / Reich connection as ussual!)
**Saturday, Sept. 23, 2006
12:30 ModeratorЈєDaniel KruschinskiЈ¬Zhiqing Liang
http://www.isgechina2006.com/isgechina2006/content.asp?id=891
**Sunday, Sept. 24, 2006
12:30 Moderator: Liselotte MettlerЈ¬Xiang Xue
S6-3 Session 3
Gazless laparoscopy Daniel Kruschinski
Lift (Gasless) -Laparoscopic adhesiolysis and application of SprayGel™ A novel approach to reduce adhesion formation and reformation-Daniel Kruschinski (Germany)
http://www.isgechina2006.com/isgechina2006/content.asp?id=891
**Sunday, Sept. 24, 2006
16:00 Moderator: Peter O’DonovanЈ¬Jinhua Leng
S8-1 Lift- (gasless) Laparoscopy - 15 years avoiding laparotomy - Daniel Kruschinski (Germany)
http://www.isgechina2006.com/isgechina2006/content.aspid=8
IHRT knows that Kruschinski went to a bakery one evening, however, he went a bit "nutsy" by asking the baker lady if she was a spy for the Americans!!! He is paranoid, that's for sure, and with good reason! (Yes, Kru, everybody, everywhere there IS watching you and talking about you, and many reporting on you too!)
IHRT keeping an "eye" on every move Kru makes or 
doesn't make!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Next IHRT finds "Kru" is scheduled to present at the : 16th ISGE Congress 2007, Osaka, Japan March 18th - 21st http://www.isge2007osaka.com/p.program.html
Invited Speakers: Daniel Kruschinski
IHRT predicts that Kruschinski WILL NOT show up in Japan!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Losers International"
Last, but not least, IHRT found Kruschinski scheduled to receive an "Award" from another organization he belongs to!
IHRT predicts that "Kru" WILL attend this meeting as he is the man of the evening, and is sure to get lots of attention from his croonies in the "LOSERS" International, where he will receive the, " Lifetime Loser" award for 2006!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kru was a no show when the keys to the Rodell Apartment/office were requested to be turned over to the landlord or charges would be pressed against Kru for theft for keeping the keys after being evicted from the Rondell, and still oweing money!!
Kru was a no show, but the keys were turned over, by the ever faithful Mrs. Lotts! 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kruschinski, you coward! 
Hiding behind this lady!
Oh well, what did IHRT expect, after all he IS a loser!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Endogate Continues"
Espionage
/Spionage/Spion/Espionnage
"Kru" flew to China after he was "fired" from Rotthalmünster-AyurSan, leaving behind his belonging, (which are cluttering up a desk there.) Today"Kru" is in Belgium where he is back within range of the police in Germany, and of course, under the ever watchful "eyes" of the IHRT spys!
What IHRT knows to date is that "Kru" and Michi were living in an apartment above an insurance company in Passauer Straße 22, 94095 Rotthalmuenster, Telefonnummer 08533 91 86 57, but as of last week his cellphone was unavailable, (he was in China) however, today it is again in service, (as he is in Belgium.)
IHRT's take on this is that "Kru" knows he is getting deeper in financial trouble not to mention medical trouble, ex-wife trouble, mistress trouble, business trouble, rental trouble, not to mention the Mercedes issue, and on and on, and he needed to "escape" in an attempt to get away from all his woes, a common criminal mindset! With cooperative efforts from his cohorts in crime, they planned his escape into China, having him hang around there for a few days then fly into Belgium, to the PAX meeting which starts tomorrow. "Kru" is in Belgium, and though he is on the docket as a speaker, IHRT highly doubts that the PAX will have Kru speak on an issue as antiquated as "Gasless" surgery, as what's the point of that, and we do see him spending lots of time on a computer today!
IHRT predicts that "Kru" plans to drive back into Germany, avoiding airports where his passport can easily be spotted as a criminal, and he intends to find another "hiding" place in Germany thinking he will be able to manipulate his future and not be brought to justice for his crime spree! Did he plan to use China & Belgium as part of his escape back into Germany and in hiding with Michi...IHRT will watch this as it develops!
IHRT's message for "Kru" is this.....you can run and you can hide, but you are not doing surgeries on unsuspecting victims anymore, and for this we have accomplished our task! However, if you think that you are not being watched, then you know little of what can be accomplished in Europe when you want information...Mata Hari may be long gone from this earth, but who is to say she didn't have a Granddaughter!
Will you really ever know when she might be around or in which form she will appear....perhaps working in a German Bakery or perhaps appearing as a friend to you, but not!
Saturday, September 23, 2006
Thursday, September 14, 2006
Kru's RESEARCH article is bumped to 2nd place
Last Friday, Kru announced the publication of his RESEARCH article in Surgical Technologies, as featured article. Today, his article has been bumped down to be the second featured article not the first one. Seems like the publisher is on to him also!
www.ump.com
www.ump.com
NUREMBERG CODE
Directives for Human Experimentation
http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
______________________
Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.
http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
______________________
Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.
Wednesday, September 13, 2006
Silence of the Lambs
Their silence speaks loudly!
Anti-IHRT/ Pro Endogyn websites are eerily silent for some time now.
Have a look.
http://iihrt.blogspot.com
http://adhesionanswers.blogspot.com
http://adhesionrelateddisorders.blogspot.com
http://freeofadhesionpain.blogspot.com
What slander, lies or retorts are left to them now that IHRT has produced overwhelming documentation of Mr. Daniel Kruschinski's (Kruczynski) unscrupulous, unethical and illegal behaviors?
The Rouges' Gallery
Helen Dynda of Hoffman, MN
Lisa Graven of Maumee, OH
Connie Harber NJ
Carolyn Meadows IL
and their fearless leader Karen Steward of Weatherford TX. ( acting on behalf of her daughter Melissa????)
I bet some of you readers might have issues with them.
Perhaps a good attorney may have issue with them on your behalf???
This link will lead you to their contact information.
(e-mail addy's and phone numbers)
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en&a=Patients-Info&b=Patientscontacts&c=International
These women have lead so many lambs to the slaughter.
Led people to financial ruin, divorce,
the brink of suicide and desperate suffering patients to failed adhesiolysis and maiming plastic surgery procedures. To procedures which had no benefit, and which resulted in much more severe pain for many people.
Their propaganda to the innocent victims of Adhesion Related Disorder of miracle cures, of a caring and talented surgeon who will give them back their life...
Tale after tale retold by them of how everyone IS adhesion free at their second look surgery and extolling the evils of carbon dixoide as if they held a bio-engineering degree from MIT.
They would just parrot whatever Kru wished.
Kru played them like a violin, right Leiza?
These Rouges were Kru's confidants and they knew the score long before IHRT existed.
The drinking, debauchery, psychosis, Kru's claims of suicidal tendencies. I could go on and on.
They let those things slide, and kept a sociopath and his scalpel together to experiment on the unsuspecting and innocent victims of ARD.
The truth from any of these players would have spared so many, but the chose to look the other way....towards the mirror and their own sick needs.
Their motivations for this behavior are unimaginable but if they led you to Germany you have every right to demand an answer from them!
As long as they got their Kru "fix".
As long as they were the big fish in a very small pond?
Perhaps they did not truly believe the miracles they purported to receive, as each of them silently slithered back to have subsequent surgeries with Dr.Kruschinski.
Symbiosis indeed!
( Melissa Steward had the dreaded abdolift umbilical adhesion at her second look surgery during her initial trip to Germany and claims to have PCOS, ya, whatever Melissa um er Karen er Laynia and I can't even remember the names you used on the old ARDchat message board to argue about Dr. Alan Johns. Anyhow, I am unsure if she skulked back to him, maybe she did and maybe she did not. If she did, nobody is saying. )
This is the most egregious example, as a mother used her own child to get a Kru fix!
They wrote under their own names and then used pseudonyms to make it seem that there were absolute throngs of people getting well from surgeries at Endogyn, Emma Klinik with Dr. "Miracle Max" Kruschinski.
They infiltrated and harvested patients for Dr. Kru from all former safe havens on the internet for adhesion sufferers.
They left damage and destruction in their wake without a second thought of the repercussions of their actions.
As long as they were pleasing their MASTER.
Tactics included kindness or intimidation and even the use of the Lord God himself to suit THEIR own agenda... the continuation of Endogyn and Kru.
Each new patient would keep Endogyn alive a little longer as the desperate hopeful person wired their cash ( begged and borrowed) directly to his bank account. Like an pyramid of loosely placed bricks. It was bound to crumble.
Hundreds of patients and obscene amounts of cash. Sports cars, wining and dining, mistresses, frequent trips and vacations First Class All the Way, ect, ect.
Kru plowed thru the money like a hot knife thru butter yet was insatiable and demanded more lambs to the slaughter. They were delivered to him too.
Did Kruschinski ever report this money to the German Taxman? I'm thinking probably not.
The Rouge's Gallery personal agendas kept them harvesting innocent, desperate, suffering, hopeless people. Kept feeding Kru his cash and stroking his already enormous ego.
Where are they now?
They are constantly going thru the pages of our websites. Right here, right now as you read this yourself, know that Helen and Lisa and the gang are reading right along with you. Kru too and his son and half of Germany.
Yet the Rouges' Gallery and their family of websites are as I said, eerily silent.
~~~and silence is golden~~~
We pray there are no more lambs to the slaughter and that justice will prevail.
It just goes to show you that "spin" will never win in the long run.
The only truth I ever knew to come from Karen Steward's mouth...."The truth will prevail".....
We agree with you Karen and will get it all documented too by the ARDvark family of websites.
COMING SOON!
A jaw- dropping document on Kruschinski is now being translated by our friends in Germany.
Stay tuned.
Anti-IHRT/ Pro Endogyn websites are eerily silent for some time now.
Have a look.
http://iihrt.blogspot.com
http://adhesionanswers.blogspot.com
http://adhesionrelateddisorders.blogspot.com
http://freeofadhesionpain.blogspot.com
What slander, lies or retorts are left to them now that IHRT has produced overwhelming documentation of Mr. Daniel Kruschinski's (Kruczynski) unscrupulous, unethical and illegal behaviors?
The Rouges' Gallery
Helen Dynda of Hoffman, MN
Lisa Graven of Maumee, OH
Connie Harber NJ
Carolyn Meadows IL
and their fearless leader Karen Steward of Weatherford TX. ( acting on behalf of her daughter Melissa????)
I bet some of you readers might have issues with them.
Perhaps a good attorney may have issue with them on your behalf???
This link will lead you to their contact information.
(e-mail addy's and phone numbers)
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en&a=Patients-Info&b=Patientscontacts&c=International
These women have lead so many lambs to the slaughter.
Led people to financial ruin, divorce,
the brink of suicide and desperate suffering patients to failed adhesiolysis and maiming plastic surgery procedures. To procedures which had no benefit, and which resulted in much more severe pain for many people.
Their propaganda to the innocent victims of Adhesion Related Disorder of miracle cures, of a caring and talented surgeon who will give them back their life...
Tale after tale retold by them of how everyone IS adhesion free at their second look surgery and extolling the evils of carbon dixoide as if they held a bio-engineering degree from MIT.
They would just parrot whatever Kru wished.
Kru played them like a violin, right Leiza?
These Rouges were Kru's confidants and they knew the score long before IHRT existed.
The drinking, debauchery, psychosis, Kru's claims of suicidal tendencies. I could go on and on.
They let those things slide, and kept a sociopath and his scalpel together to experiment on the unsuspecting and innocent victims of ARD.
The truth from any of these players would have spared so many, but the chose to look the other way....towards the mirror and their own sick needs.
Their motivations for this behavior are unimaginable but if they led you to Germany you have every right to demand an answer from them!
As long as they got their Kru "fix".
As long as they were the big fish in a very small pond?
Perhaps they did not truly believe the miracles they purported to receive, as each of them silently slithered back to have subsequent surgeries with Dr.Kruschinski.
Symbiosis indeed!
( Melissa Steward had the dreaded abdolift umbilical adhesion at her second look surgery during her initial trip to Germany and claims to have PCOS, ya, whatever Melissa um er Karen er Laynia and I can't even remember the names you used on the old ARDchat message board to argue about Dr. Alan Johns. Anyhow, I am unsure if she skulked back to him, maybe she did and maybe she did not. If she did, nobody is saying. )
This is the most egregious example, as a mother used her own child to get a Kru fix!
They wrote under their own names and then used pseudonyms to make it seem that there were absolute throngs of people getting well from surgeries at Endogyn, Emma Klinik with Dr. "Miracle Max" Kruschinski.
They infiltrated and harvested patients for Dr. Kru from all former safe havens on the internet for adhesion sufferers.
They left damage and destruction in their wake without a second thought of the repercussions of their actions.
As long as they were pleasing their MASTER.
Tactics included kindness or intimidation and even the use of the Lord God himself to suit THEIR own agenda... the continuation of Endogyn and Kru.
Each new patient would keep Endogyn alive a little longer as the desperate hopeful person wired their cash ( begged and borrowed) directly to his bank account. Like an pyramid of loosely placed bricks. It was bound to crumble.
Hundreds of patients and obscene amounts of cash. Sports cars, wining and dining, mistresses, frequent trips and vacations First Class All the Way, ect, ect.
Kru plowed thru the money like a hot knife thru butter yet was insatiable and demanded more lambs to the slaughter. They were delivered to him too.
Did Kruschinski ever report this money to the German Taxman? I'm thinking probably not.
The Rouge's Gallery personal agendas kept them harvesting innocent, desperate, suffering, hopeless people. Kept feeding Kru his cash and stroking his already enormous ego.
Where are they now?
They are constantly going thru the pages of our websites. Right here, right now as you read this yourself, know that Helen and Lisa and the gang are reading right along with you. Kru too and his son and half of Germany.
Yet the Rouges' Gallery and their family of websites are as I said, eerily silent.
~~~and silence is golden~~~
We pray there are no more lambs to the slaughter and that justice will prevail.
It just goes to show you that "spin" will never win in the long run.
The only truth I ever knew to come from Karen Steward's mouth...."The truth will prevail".....
We agree with you Karen and will get it all documented too by the ARDvark family of websites.
COMING SOON!
A jaw- dropping document on Kruschinski is now being translated by our friends in Germany.
Stay tuned.
Friday, September 08, 2006
Kru did RESEARCH on pts. without their permission
ATTN everyone who had laporoscopic adhesiolysis in Emma Klinic between 2002-2004 by Kru.
Did you know that 35 of you were RESEARCH subjects?
Did you sign permission to be in a RESEARCH STUDY?
How do you feel about the fact that you were NOT informed that Kru was EXPERIMENTING on you?
Because you were a "research subject", do you feel that perhaps Kru should have paid you, rather than you paying HIM?
To read the RESEARCH article in which you may have been one of the 35 pts, go to www.ump.com. Click on the right hand side, where you see his name.
Kru announced today 9/8/06, on Endogyn.de, that this latest article, authored by him and four others, has been published. Click on the link to UMP. There you will see the Abstract and the complete article.
1. In this article, Kru admits that he was doing RESEARCH. He uses the words "design", "study", "prospective analysis", "bias". Each of these words indicate that what Kru did was "RESEARCH".
The "design" of the "study" was to use abdolift, spray gel, and special surgical scissors to do adhesiolyis of abdominal adhesions, to do a second look after 7 days, and for some of the pts., a third look within the first six months.
The term "Prospective Analysis", if used correctly, would means that he predicted before doing the procedures what the results would be.
However, as the article is written, he actually did a "Retrospective Analysis", meaning that he did the surgeries, and then analyzed the results.
The article admits that there may have been operator "Bias" because there was only one person doing the surgeries, and only one person rating the adhesions using a rating chart that he states "we" developed, and only one person doing the second and third looks.
2. The article reports on the surgery of 35 pts. from USA, UK, and Germany, regarding their first and second look, and for five of those patients, their third look (which occurred within 6 months of their second look). He states that all 35 patients had adhesiolysis with spray gel, between 2002-2004.
The article does not state that they were the FIRST 35 patients, or which 35 patients. (In other places on his web site, he reports that he did adhesiolysis surgery with spray gel on many more than 35 pts. in that time frame). Also, Kru wrote on his message board a few months ago that the report would be on the FIRST 35 patients, but the report does not say that it was the first 35. It could be about any 35 of the patients who had surgery between 2002-2004.
The article states that there was one "operator" (surgeon), and one person who rated the adhesions, and one person who rated the results.
To those who were there, you know that Harry was NOT in the OR, that Homberg was NOT in the OR, and that NO "scientists" were in the OR.
It was only Kru. In the article, Kru says that "we" did this and that, but in reality, it was only him doing it all.
Kru doing the surgery. Kru rating the adhesions. Kru rating the results at 2nd and 3rd look.
Five authors are listed for this article.
It is possible that five people collaborated on writing this article, but all the data was collected by a sole person, Kru.
The article states that there was no control group, and that there could have been operator "bias", and that no long-term follow-up has been completed, but that it will be.
Even people who have not had the opportunity to take a college course in "Research" can determine that this article is reporting on "research" experiments.
Remember when Kru loudly and repeatedly proclaimed on his message board, "There was NO STUDY. It was NOT RESEARCH". That was in response to a person who was asking for data to back up his claims.
He removed all of that correspondance from his message boards, but IHRT has it all CACHED.
PS: Dear readers: Please notice on his ENGLISH Endogyn message board, Kru tells about new pts he is doing surgery on in Germany. However on his German Endogyn message board, he does NOT mention that he is doing surgery on pts. What could be the reason that the German readers are not being given this information? IHRT thinks it might be because it would be too easy for the German pts. to verify his claims of doing surgery. They could very easily call the hospital in Passau, or even go there and find out.
Did you know that 35 of you were RESEARCH subjects?
Did you sign permission to be in a RESEARCH STUDY?
How do you feel about the fact that you were NOT informed that Kru was EXPERIMENTING on you?
Because you were a "research subject", do you feel that perhaps Kru should have paid you, rather than you paying HIM?
To read the RESEARCH article in which you may have been one of the 35 pts, go to www.ump.com. Click on the right hand side, where you see his name.
Kru announced today 9/8/06, on Endogyn.de, that this latest article, authored by him and four others, has been published. Click on the link to UMP. There you will see the Abstract and the complete article.
1. In this article, Kru admits that he was doing RESEARCH. He uses the words "design", "study", "prospective analysis", "bias". Each of these words indicate that what Kru did was "RESEARCH".
The "design" of the "study" was to use abdolift, spray gel, and special surgical scissors to do adhesiolyis of abdominal adhesions, to do a second look after 7 days, and for some of the pts., a third look within the first six months.
The term "Prospective Analysis", if used correctly, would means that he predicted before doing the procedures what the results would be.
However, as the article is written, he actually did a "Retrospective Analysis", meaning that he did the surgeries, and then analyzed the results.
The article admits that there may have been operator "Bias" because there was only one person doing the surgeries, and only one person rating the adhesions using a rating chart that he states "we" developed, and only one person doing the second and third looks.
2. The article reports on the surgery of 35 pts. from USA, UK, and Germany, regarding their first and second look, and for five of those patients, their third look (which occurred within 6 months of their second look). He states that all 35 patients had adhesiolysis with spray gel, between 2002-2004.
The article does not state that they were the FIRST 35 patients, or which 35 patients. (In other places on his web site, he reports that he did adhesiolysis surgery with spray gel on many more than 35 pts. in that time frame). Also, Kru wrote on his message board a few months ago that the report would be on the FIRST 35 patients, but the report does not say that it was the first 35. It could be about any 35 of the patients who had surgery between 2002-2004.
The article states that there was one "operator" (surgeon), and one person who rated the adhesions, and one person who rated the results.
To those who were there, you know that Harry was NOT in the OR, that Homberg was NOT in the OR, and that NO "scientists" were in the OR.
It was only Kru. In the article, Kru says that "we" did this and that, but in reality, it was only him doing it all.
Kru doing the surgery. Kru rating the adhesions. Kru rating the results at 2nd and 3rd look.
Five authors are listed for this article.
It is possible that five people collaborated on writing this article, but all the data was collected by a sole person, Kru.
The article states that there was no control group, and that there could have been operator "bias", and that no long-term follow-up has been completed, but that it will be.
Even people who have not had the opportunity to take a college course in "Research" can determine that this article is reporting on "research" experiments.
Remember when Kru loudly and repeatedly proclaimed on his message board, "There was NO STUDY. It was NOT RESEARCH". That was in response to a person who was asking for data to back up his claims.
He removed all of that correspondance from his message boards, but IHRT has it all CACHED.
PS: Dear readers: Please notice on his ENGLISH Endogyn message board, Kru tells about new pts he is doing surgery on in Germany. However on his German Endogyn message board, he does NOT mention that he is doing surgery on pts. What could be the reason that the German readers are not being given this information? IHRT thinks it might be because it would be too easy for the German pts. to verify his claims of doing surgery. They could very easily call the hospital in Passau, or even go there and find out.
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
Kru is a liar, again!!
This recent post by "Kru" shows how "desperately needing" he is of attention, as he is NOT performing surgeries anywhere on anyone at anytime!Note that "Kru" makes "claims" of having patients from other countries!IHRT asks him to answer these questions; Who is "WE?"
Patients are coming to, "who" for a surgery? Patients are going "where" for a surgery and most important, "why" would any patient come to Germany for a surgery! What does it offer anyone that differs from anywhere else? You perhaps "Kru?"
(Now that you got hair and a "glamour "shot photo up in Endogyn, the motel room surgical facility?")
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My nurse may not be a nurse, but maybe her "glamour" shot will count for something!
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en&a=EndoGyn&b=TeamOR&c=Michaelakatzer
IHRT recalls the words from the horses mouth himself: "Kruschinski is only doing "Tollfree Phone consulting for only Germany," every Thursday between 3:00 pm and 5:00 pm (except holiday times)"
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en&a=Patients-Info&b=TeleconsultingE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Kru" is *no longer associated with any medical facility in any country,
*Nada, Nyet, Non, Na, Nö, Ne!
Kru's own words: " What is so special to move facilities ? If patients want, I can still perform their surgeries at the Emma... no problem at all. It's true that we closed the office in Seligenstadt... but why not ? I can do whatever I want. Open new facilities, close old ones"
IHRT add's, "I can get kicked out of one, go to another, get kicked out of that one, move to another...after all, Endogyn is ME and my computer, so what..?"
IHRT encourages anyone who questions our claims that Kruschinski is lieing in this post, to contact Rothmunster, and ask if you can schedule a surgery with Kru, call Mrs. lotz and ask that same question!
The REAL fact of the matter is that Kruschinski can't perform surgery at in the UK, Schärding-Austria, Offenbach, Rotthalmünster, Eilenriedeklinik Hannover, Klinik am Zuckerberg Braunschweigm, Mallorca / Spain, Emma Klinik, at any time!"Kru" hasn't done ANY surgeries this week at all, anywhere, he is a liar!
"Kru" will NOT be offering surgery in Spain in October 2006, liar!
"Kru" does not perform surgery in Hanover or Braunschweig, liar!
"Kru" has threatened to commit suicide more then once, but he hasn't, liar!
"Kru" doesn't have a father who survived Ausschwitz, liar!
"Kru" did not secure insurance in the UK, liar!
In fact, Kruschinski is so packed with lies, that it is a wonder anyone believes anything out of his mouth! (Except Karen Steward &
Helen Dynda!)
Kruschinski has told so many lies that he isn't even sure what is fact or fiction in his life anymore, tomorrow he will tell us he is God..oh yeah, he already told us that one, but it was also a lie, and an easy lie to detect!
"Kru" has as many alias's as Katzer has, and he probably doesn't know which one is really him!
"Daniel Kruschinski Alias Daniel Druschinski Alias Daniel Kruczinsky"
And todays story goes like this...............
Doc_Kru
Most advanced
Gender: Male
Location:
Registered: Jul 2003
Status: Offline
Posted: Sunday, September 3, 2006
the last few weeks there were some more adhesion cases; just last week we had a very severe adhesiolysis in a male Patient from Vienna, he will have his seocnd look tomorrow. Also a german lady, who has got a big laparotomy for endometriosis and developed extreme adhesions, has her 2nd look laparoscopy tomorrow. A lady from US has her first surgery on Tuesday. Another german lady has a hysterectomyx tomorrow. Two 3rd looks are additionally on Tuesday. A busy week...
Regards
Daniel Kruschinski, MD)
EndoGyn.com, Adhesions.de, Hysterectomy.de, Fibroids.de, Endometriosis.de, gasless-laparoscopy.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IHRT is watching this date as it looms closer for "Kru!"
VIIth PAX meeting Leuven, Belgium 2006 Sept 28-30
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=wVClSnX3O0hITp77f9QwGFcyFo&forum=2&thread=2495
Posted Saturday, August 5, 2006 @ 12:43 PM
VIIth PAX meeting Leuven, Belgium 2006 Sept 28-30
"Internat. Meeting on The Peritoneal Cavity Adhesion formation Tumor implantation Mesh Biology Peritoneal immunology"
There is going to be an excellent meeting with very promising lectures on adhesion formation, treatment and prevention. We are going to present our results on Gasless Lift laparoscopy at this meeting.
Here are the speakers:
http://www.gynsurgery.org/pax/meeting/content/speakers.shtml
and here the flyer of the congress:
http://www.gynsurgery.org/pax/meeting/content/flyer.pdf
IHRT thinks that it has figured out why Karen Stweard has such a bizzare infatuation with her daughters OB/GYN..it isn't because he is a gyn at all, we are of the opinion that he MIGHT have offered her one of his other specialities..breast reconstruction!
Here we see "Gingirl" enjoying her gyn and celebrating her new look!
"Kru" established the center for minimally invasive surgery and was in charge of consulting hours for plastic surgery of the breast.
http://www.endogyn.de/index.php?seite=endogyn&sprache=en&a=EndoGyn&b=Physicians&c=DrKruschinski
"Oh Wow! I am a "nurse, well sort of, but can I work at Endogyn??
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)