Written by Dr. Harry Reich of PA. This letter allowed the experimental surgeries for CASH, in Germany to continue. He was listed as the Director of Endogyn at the time he wrote this.
It was enough to halt the criminal investigation.
"To whom it may concern: I am writing to set the record straight regarding Daniel Kruschinski ofSeligenstadt, Germany and his "problem" with Dawn Rose, from Boston, Mass.
Presently, many Americans seek surgery in many specialties in Europe because of the medications and techniques that are not available at home. In the USA, it often takes many years for FDA and peer approval. Dr. Kruschinski did adhesion surgery on Dawn Rose using a very effectiveanti-adhesion Spraygel that is not available in the US.
After hearing that this woman was still having problems from some US consumer advocates, I did a
laparoscopy on her in November 2003 to find out for myself and hopefully help her.
She had no adhesions at all!
Please click here to review Dr. Reich's operative report on victim Dawn Rose.
Please click here to see photo's of Dawn Rose's Surgery
I explained to Dawn that I believed Daniel Kruschinski had done excellent surgery on her, and I felt that she then realized it to be true. A videotape of this complete surgery is available. I suspect that Dawn Rose's letters to the justice ministry regarding Dr.Daniel Kruschinski have little to do with his surgical skill or care of this woman. Adhesion patients often have false expectations and will blame their surgeon for all future ills. I presently support Dr. Kruschinski's work at EndoGyn, and would like toget more involved with it in the future. We are friends and are working together on international projects in the field of endoscopic gynecology.
Dr.Kruschinski is a reliable partner and physician and an excellent surgeon with international reputation. He will be the chairman of the 12th Regional Congress of the International Society for Gynaecologic Endoscopy in Munich in the year 2007. Sincerely,
Dr. Harry Reich
Vice-president of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy"
______________________________________
What motive would have Dr. Reich jepordize his whole career to remain involved with Dr. Kruschinski? ????
There is this motive.
Alta Vista Translation....Physician far away healthy kidney. $2.8 million pronouncement of judgement - negligent distance of a kidney Hunter Shkolnik brought the case 46 of a year old woman before court, at which a laparoskopie was made for the distance of a Gebaermutterfibrose. During the operation the operating surgeon removed its left kidney in the acceptance it concerns the Fibrose. The entire laparaskopische procedure was taken up on video and played the jury, which could with reputation like a healthy kidney was taken. Marilee May pool of broadcasting corporations versus Harry Reich physician. If you trust into medical specialists due to their negligence were lost which in addition were trained your life to protect, contact .......More................http://www.rheingoldlaw.com/recentVerdicts/kidney/index.html
Cash!!!!! with no strings attached no malpractice insurance fees to pay and an endless stream of victims who would be too poor or ill to complain........That would be IHRT's guess but hopefully a jury of his peers will decide.
Dr. med. Daniel KruschinskiEndoGyn®--Dr. med. Daniel KruschinskiEndoGyn®
In Michi, Daniel's mistress and susposed OR nurse is qoated Daniel Kruschinski......."The pateints are going to suffer anyways."
( see Katzer documents)
http://ihrt.blogspot.com/2007/06/daniel-kruschinski-needs-grandstand-and.html#links scroll down to see the letter.
1 comment:
IHRT would like to clarify that in the law suit against Dr. Harry Reich, that the kidney was somehow malformed and partially removed.
Again proving you can't believe everything you read.
Post a Comment