ARD, CAPPS, Adhesions and Adhesion Related Disorder , Internal Scar Tissue, Hope for those who suffer from Adhesions

Friday, May 19, 2006

Endoygn's "Tag Team" approach to "HARVESTING PATIENTS!"

Just when IHRT thinks that “Kru’s” groupies who have posted intentional miss-leading information to “harvest” ARD patients to Endogyn have learned that IHRT WILL expose them for doing that, they do it AGAIN! Have they no conscience or scruples? (Of course they don’t, look whom they promote!)
The “dangers” of these recent posts in Endogyn is that they do NOT present the facts as they really exist, but then again, this IS the usual agenda in Endogyn! What a sad thing it is that we, the victims of ARD, cannot even trust our “own” to be honest with us, and worse, to know that they intentionally strive to deceive us so that they can get a pat on the head from someone who deceived them!
The good news is that IHRT WILL present the facts, and we will present it ALL the facts as IHRT will NOT put up with this type of “scamming” of ARD victims by those who claim to care about them! The very thing that is going on in Endogyn right now with these two posts is why so many of the patients to Endogyn are still suffering; because they trusted the words of others who miss-represented the truth!
Lets walk through these posts together….
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=MQetm39HVgV3flIZQQSEc1Iwht&forum=2&thread=2314
Posted Thursday, May 18, 2006 @ 08:02 PM
What we have here in the post from Sally Grigg presents only what is seen as a successful surgery with “Kru,” and to make matters worse, the second post by Leiza Hiltz is used to validate how wonderful Sally’s surgery was! This is called the ol’ “Endogyn Tag Team” approach to harvesting! IHRT has seen it a million times in Endogyn!
Sally Grigg returned to Endogyn at LEAST three times for repeat adhesiolysis procedures, (side note: Sally complained to another ARD patient that she did not receive a “couple of thousands of dollars” from “Kru” for keeping quite about it! IHRT does have the original 2003 emails between Grigg and other ARD patients to Endogyn if Sally would like IHRT to post them. See one of them below this post.) Sally’s harvesting approach starts with the innocent “baby talk” with a dab of the “caring, kind and concerned, group hug” approach and then she throws in her spiritual self for a bit of “affect” to convince that HER words are true! “May God Bless everyone and help us to unite and make the world a better place and stop spreading "uck" around to hurt other people. Two wrongs have never made a right.” Yet Sally is deliberately miss-representing her case without so much as a care about who might get hurt by it! (This behavior by one of our own is beyond IHRT’s ability to comprehend!) Anyway, here is the “rest of the Sally Grigg story!” Sally suffered an ruptured appendix after her initial adhesiolysis with “Kru” and things like that are not good following an adhesiolysis procedure no matter where you had it performed, but traveling to another country for it does make it hit harder! Though we can sympathize with Sally on such an unfortunate incident, what we do NOT sympathize with is the fact that she had to return to Endogyn for multiple surgeries as a result of this situation. IF Sally is well today as a result of multiple surgeries at Endogyn, then she is one of a very few, but we know that Sally was also one of those who grossly miss-represented their surgeries at Endogyn back in 2003 by NOT telling others how many times they had returned to Endogyn! Sally is currently doing this again, and it isn’t so much that she is omitting the fact of multiple returns to Endogyn, she is neglecting to mention the costs of those trips to Germany, and that she got nothing more then she could have secured right here in the USA where she probably would have had to undergo multiple surgeries too! IHRT asks how many of you could afford to make 3 or 4 trips to Germany such as Sally has done? How many of you could afford such trips, no to mention the costs of the surgeries, but flights and accommodations costs as well? To many facts omitted in Sally Grigg's post patting “Kru’s” back, Again!
Posted Thursday, May 18, 2006 @ 09:17 PM
Leiza Hiltz,
“ I know how easy it is to get so excited about being able to do things again and getting so busy that we forget to share this joy, but it really does mean a lot to those out there that may find this site and be looking for answers to help themselves get out of agony. Your post could be the one that helps convince someone out there that there is hope and help to look forward to. I know it was reading the testimonies of Dr. Kruschinski's patients that gave me courage to want to live again so thanks again and I hope others will take the time to post their stories of joy and recovery, it is so refreshing!”
All “IHRT” can say about this post from Leiza is that she is exactly right about Sally’s words convincing others they too will get well in "A" (singular) surgery at Endogyn!
Leiza has made the case for the necessity for IHRT to have to continue to monitor the posts at Endogyn, as they are definitely deceiving and harmful to desperate, vulnerable and suffering ARD patients! Shame on both of you!

Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:19:57 -0600 (CST)From: joanne@bombobeach.com (Jo)To: ADHESIONS@OBGYN.NETSubject: Sally Grigg is home from Germany! Hello everyone!I had a lovely surprise this morning - a phone call from our Californian friend Sally! Home from Germany just two days ago after her third major surgey in just a few short months.

The truth be told in the post below!!
Thursday, May 18, 2006
Why I do not recommend Dr. Kruschinski !!

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Are there still people going to Germany for surgery with Dr. K.? He used to say who was there for their first look, and that they were adhesion-free on the second look, but I have not noticed any such information lately.

Anonymous said...

Gosh I hope not but desparate people guiding desparate people is how they get there.
I went.
I felt pressured by Dr K to provide more patients for him and I felt like if I did not then no more surgery for me.
Or worse yet...have surgery with a Dr. who was MAD at me.,,,,,that can't be good.
I think it's all starting to fall apart
over there and this site has provided food for thought to all who may have considered
going. I hope the jig is finally up and no one else is a ticking time bomb like me.....never ever adhesion free!
Best wishes Morgan.
Dawn