More "RED FLAGS" surface regarding Endogyn, Seligenstadt, Frankfurt, Germany!

More "RED FLAGS" surface regarding Endogyn, Seligenstadt, Frankfurt, Germany!
When Daniel's groupies open a door to attack others who advocate for the benefit of persons afflicted with ARD, or publicly post things that bring forth issues of concern verses information, they open the door for a lot of scrutiny of issues that really need to be exposed, challenged and questioned when it comes to Endogyn! In doing this, both Karen and Helen do all of us a favor as many of the issues they bring up would have otherwise remained buried!

I would also like to make a prediction here:
Both patients who have had recent adhesiolysis surgery just last week will NOT be improved, and it will not be made public, like all the others have, when they have to present back to Endogyn for 3rd & 4th surgeries! We will not hear any weekly updates by them but we do not hear that from any of them, anyway, but we WILL hear from Karen chanting her praises for Daniel, carrying her little "whoopie" signs with the surgeons name on it(sick)and her reports of how the patients are doing! Also know that when a patient is not doing well, Karen does not allow them to post such messages, but rather puts pressure on them to remain hushed, and has even threatened to expose their every bit of personal information publicly if they do share anything adverse regarding their surgery in Endogyn.

The reason we will not hear about them will be due to my prediction here today!

Has anyone noticed that not even Helen Dynda shares her surgical outcomes from Daniel...yet she will make every attempt to pump up Daniel as the "best," whatever and return to him time and again for surgeries, seeing nothing wrong in that behavior! Does she get well as a result of his surgeries on her or not?

The issue most concerning to me is the adhesions that the "hook" creates for "adhesion" patients going to Endogyn to get rid of adhesions!

My next concern is this surgeons claims to being a "reconstructive" surgeon and doing "abdominal scar revisions, when his "experience" with "reconstructive" surgery is "breast" "reconstructive" surgery!

The next issue is the absence of "credentials" for Daniel, all we are asking for is his credentials, his education, schools of learning, graduations and degrees from, areas of special education...if for no other reason then a patients right to know!

I am also concerned, as are others, about his claims of being a "reconstructive surgeon" and doing "plastic" surgery on abdominal scars!

Helen, produce on these "credentials" please, as you and Daniel are close friends so you do have access to this information, and YOU always say that "Knowledge IS Power" and I am certain that your concerns for the ARD patient supercede your allegiance to this surgeon, am I correct?
What might seem a petty issue to some in requesting this material on the surgeon at Endogyn is anything but petty, as this surgeon puts forth more energy in harvesting ARD patients with tons of promises for them to get well, yet we are not seeing this happening, rather, we are seeing ARD patients returning time and again for more and more adhesiolysis procedures as a result of his procedure, and we are reading his claims as a top laporoscopic surgeon with "reconstructive" plastic surgery skills, and yet, NO credentials for any of the above!
We see him "entice" his patients to rally behind his claims, and of course, what ARD patient is not going to do that if they think he will make them well, even after they see the pictures of his surgical outcomes with "the hook!"
My God, look at his pictures of his surgical outcomes, his adhesiolysis, and ask yourself what kind of person would go to a surgeon who profess's this outcome of his
own adhesiolysis procedure!

Let me be honest here, we all know that many, if not most, ARD patients are well enough to tour, eat and do feel better right after an adhesiolysis, and we know that the REAL results come after a few months to a few years after an adhesiolysis to be able to determine it's success! There really is not anything at Endogyn that stands out as offering any higher quality adhesiolysis than can be found in any small town USA!
Prove me wrong here...but not with post surgical patients who are just out of surgery, or patients who have gone back 3 & 4 times, and still sing praises of this surgeon because of...who knows why! I want to see credentials, long term results and ONLY from surgical patients, not their family members!
A couple of years ago, I exposed and asked questions about the unethical things coming out of Endogyn and now I am seeing the answers to some of my concerns being posted by Daniel himself and with pictures. I see Helen not able to secure credentials, and she is about as close to this surgeon as one can get, and I am still seeing Karen write nasty posts to me, and for what, well, no matter about that after all, she IS "gingirl!" (Doesn't take much imagination to associate her bizarre relationship with Daniel to her "handle!)

Last, but not least, ladies of the Endogyn groupies, if you want to play with me, get the big guns out as I am ready, willing and able to play and for me, what your doing is exposing just what those afflicted with ARD need to know about the realities of adhesiolysis at Endogyn! I have more to question and I will keep it coming as you accused me in a public way once again of things that are not true in your attempts to "discredit " me, and for what? Why? But you did that, and in doing that, you peaked my interest into happenings at Endogyn once again!!
For this, I thank-you!
Tag, your it!
Beverly

Posted Monday, February 27, 2006 @ 02:04 AM
Credentials of Daniel Kruschinski, M.D.
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=yO2MSQ3lElZHS2tX37akNOkUxW&forum=2&thread=2253

Since I had such a difficult time trying to find Dr. Kruschinski's credentials, I have decided to post his credentials here where visitors to this website will be able to learn more about Dr. Kruschinski and his accomplishments.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Not one of the links offers information on Daniel Krushiksnki's credentials! NOT ONE!
There are listings of his "accomplishments" however, it is well recognized that his "accomplishments" are touted by himself for himself and are NOT credentials, rather, bragging of ones self!

Helen states that even she had a hard time finding "credentials" belonging to Daniel, and I question why she doesn't just ask Daniel where to find them as he posted that he and Helen have an "excellent patient-doctor relationship." (See post of Thursday, August 28, 2003 @ 02:48 AM below)

Posted Thursday, August 28, 2003 @ 02:48 AM
SUCCESS RATES OF SURGERY, an excurs, by Daniel Kruschinski.....
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=Wtn4YkmGODKiQsKXpEhetdplBH&forum=2&thread=275&session=yO2MSQ3lElZHS2tX37akNOkUxW
I will try to explain what adhesions and adhesion surgery are. I will do this regularly, and in the context of Helen’s ARD course where I can refer to her explanations. This is, by the way, a good example of an excellent patient-doctor relationship.

1) The surgeons describe adhesions using a SCORE system: firstly by the number of adhesions (e.g. covering an area of 15 cm) and, secondly, by their severity (how they are attached to the organs, how dense, filmy, etc), and how they can be removed (sharp dissection, bloodless cutting, etc). There is much more to a surgeon's view on adhesions than meets the eye. We see an improvement of the adhesion score as a success, whereas the patient often sees an improvement of symptoms or a complete disappearance of symptoms as a success!

2) After surgery some adhesions may return. Again, we measure this by scoring, so we might have an improvement of an adhesion situation while the patient says s(h)e has pain and therefore concludes the adhesions are back!

In some cases there may be a huge improvement of adhesions (by 90%), but some small adhesions might have formed somewhere and cause extreme pain. Small adhesions can even cause bowel obstructions (briden ileus)!
Overall, even if a surgeon reduces adhesions by 90% (as in this individual case), the patient has pain that returns and therefore considers the procedure to be a total failure (0% healed).
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Come on Helen, do the right thing.