Two confused Endogyn patients…..
Posted Thursday, May 17, 2007 @ 05:20 PM
What I don't get...is any Dr. in the world could be a target for slander....no one Dr. is a miracle worker....There is something very suspiciuos about the aggresive campaign against Dr. K, many times Dr.'s in the U.S. couldn't help me but I didn't organize a slander campaign against them. I've worked in the healthcare system an no one is guaranteed a medical outcome...It's up to the fate. of the person.... sincerely sandy
(IHRT adds: Sandy is so profound in this post that it is a wonder she is "confused" about anything!)
Posted Thursday, May 17, 2007 @ 06:22 PM
Hi Sandy, I could not agree with you more, especially it was a Dr's screwup that landed me in the fix with adhesions. It just seems that there is so much energy and hatred directed at Dr. Kruschinski it just does not make sense. All I know is that I am better than I was before I went to Dr. Kruschinski and that is the fact. Hope to see you soon and hope your pup is doing well.
Jan
(IHRT adds that Jan is so, so, so, "confusing in her sentence structure" that IHRT is confused as to what she is confused about!)
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=56WSCLQCkFrGtQQXvnsVxAnhwG&forum=2&thread=5619
It appears that these two members of “Kru’s” crew just don’t get It.
Posted Thursday, May 17, 2007 @ 05:20 PM
What I don't get...is any Dr. in the world could be a target for slander....no one Dr. is a miracle worker....There is something very suspiciuos about the aggresive campaign against Dr. K, many times Dr.'s in the U.S. couldn't help me but I didn't organize a slander campaign against them. I've worked in the healthcare system an no one is guaranteed a medical outcome...It's up to the fate. of the person.... sincerely sandy
(IHRT adds: Sandy is so profound in this post that it is a wonder she is "confused" about anything!)
Posted Thursday, May 17, 2007 @ 06:22 PM
Hi Sandy, I could not agree with you more, especially it was a Dr's screwup that landed me in the fix with adhesions. It just seems that there is so much energy and hatred directed at Dr. Kruschinski it just does not make sense. All I know is that I am better than I was before I went to Dr. Kruschinski and that is the fact. Hope to see you soon and hope your pup is doing well.
Jan
(IHRT adds that Jan is so, so, so, "confusing in her sentence structure" that IHRT is confused as to what she is confused about!)
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=56WSCLQCkFrGtQQXvnsVxAnhwG&forum=2&thread=5619
It appears that these two members of “Kru’s” crew just don’t get It.
Patient #1
Sandy seems to think this “slander campaign,” a Kruschinski term, is because a patient or two, (or three or four,) did not secure improvements from a surgery or two with Kru, (or three or four.) Sandy knows that with adhesions some surgeons just do not make people well, so why such an “aggressive” campaign to …to… to do whatever it is IHRT seems to be doing, and she asks this with what appears to be sincere puzzlement on her part.
“There IS something “suspicious” about this aggressive campaign against Dr. Kruschinski,” Sandy says!
Patient #2
Then good ‘ol Jan speaks up in what also appears to be “confusion” over the matter as presented by Sandy. Surgeons screwed Jan up, and Kruschinski improved her, whats there to question? However, Jan agrees that there is so much “energy and hatred directed at Kruschinski --it just does not make sense!”
(IHRT recalls when Jan wished Kruschinski and his “close loving” family a “Merry Christmas!” Kruschinski claimed to be Jewish, which he is not, and he certainly does not have any semblance of a loving close family, but, “family” could mean something totally different to someone like Jan!)
"We are two of a kind!"Ladies, Ladies, come on now, THINK outside the box for a minute! (IF you know what that means.)
How often can someone read the “facts” about Endogyn and Kruschinski, all with validation, and not think that maybe, JUST MAYBE there is some truth to the many factually based accusations against Kruschinski? HELLO!
My goodness, even Frank Bolt can’t stay out of IHRT, and he told us we were making fools of ourselves with all our “rubbish!” Okay then,Frank-o!
You are invited to follow along as IHRT takes a look at these two VERY confused patients of Kruschinski’s …..maybe IHRT can offer them some insight as to how to become, “unconfused!”
Patient #1 was supposedly well following her “gasless surgery with Spraygel” procedure with Kruschinski, or someone, and was told by Kru that she did not have any adhesions in her second look procedure, but now Patient #1 is NOT well and looking to return to Germany for another surgery with “whomever.”
And Sandy chastised patients who so much as made a claim that they were not well after surgery with Kru, as SHE WAS well, and then she called them trolls for stating THEIR case! So it is written.
Patient #2 IS well, (Jan appears to be among a very few who reaped any benefit from a surgery with Kruschinski,) however, she cannot understand why those who were not well after Kru’s surgery are angry at him, after all SHE is well, so what’s the problem! And she too chastises patients for stating THEIR cases! So it is written.
It appears that neither of these “confused” women understands, nor perhaps accepts, that many, many, many patients to Kruschinski were:
A.) “told that they were cured and did not have adhesions in their second look laps!”
B.) lied to about Kruschinski’s adhesiolysis was BETTER & CHEAPER then they could get in the USA, (with exception to many 2-4 return “cash” follow-up procedures with Kruschinski for some of these patients, not that THEY matter to these two “confused” patents!)
C.) Better due to HIS “Gasless” procedure and “Spraygel,” and cheaper only if you’re a millionaire!
D.) Lets not forget that the patients were also lied to about the “statistics” of surgeries Kruschinski performed in HIS “clinical studies” using Confluent Spraygel, (which turned out to be that Kruschinski NEVER was part of or did any studies for Confluent.)
E.) Kruchinski claimed he did 4000 procedures with “gasless & Spraygel” in his harvesting patients to him, it is facts that he didn’t even perform the 400 he claimed he did in a scientific report which turned out to be bogus, and in Karen Stewards book, May 2007, he claims to have performed ONLY 200 “Gasless” surgeries with Spraygel!
F.) Kruschinski knew that the “Abdolift” was causing adhesions, yet NEVER mentioned that anywhere in his web site!
G.) Kruschinski conveniently omitted in his “patient lists” that many of the patients listed there returned for multiple surgeries to Endogyn, Helen Dynda included!
H.) Kruschinski also conveniently omitted that there wasn’t, “exactly” a real Institute “ or “Endogyn” other then on a web site..
I.) Kruschinski also conveniently omitted the FACT that he had been “dismissed” from 13 medical Kliniks in Germany prior to Emma Klinik!
J.) His “associated surgeons” list in Endogyn changed like the wind as did his “Endogyn” affiliations!
K.) Let’s not forget that the “Institute for Endoscopic Surgery” was as bogus as his “nurse/mistress’s” credentials were!
L.) Patient confidentiality was an unknown word to Kruschinski…however, it was a way to “promote” his business!
M.) Kruschinski’s claims that his “gasless” surgeries with “Spraygel” were in fact “experimental procedures” of his own accord! ( Most cases using 5-7 kits of Spraygel per surgery and STILL not being effective! DID Kru really used as much “Spraygel” as he charged YOU for, after all, all you ever saw was pictures of YOUR surgery!! Yeah, right, and IHRT has a bridge in the desert for sale, any takers? Sandy, Jan?)
This list can go on and on and on…
Well, now THAT was a full plate of facts to digest!
IHRT can see why these two patients got confused, as hey, these things aren’t all THAT important to someone seeking surgical intervention for one of the most infringing and horrendous medical conditions in the world today! Right ladies???
The best news is that more patients DID realize the validity of IHRT’s claims, and stopped going to “Con Kruschinski” and were NOT sucked in by the words of people who appear to be, “One Fry Short of a Happy Meal!”
IHRT suggests that these two patients try to read, and assimilate, what is in: The “Endogate papers”
http://www.adhesionrelateddisorder.com/Endogate-Papers.html
Stay tuned to IHRT for breaking News next week!
Daniel has finally awakened the sleeping giant of his demise.
How often can someone read the “facts” about Endogyn and Kruschinski, all with validation, and not think that maybe, JUST MAYBE there is some truth to the many factually based accusations against Kruschinski? HELLO!
My goodness, even Frank Bolt can’t stay out of IHRT, and he told us we were making fools of ourselves with all our “rubbish!” Okay then,Frank-o!
You are invited to follow along as IHRT takes a look at these two VERY confused patients of Kruschinski’s …..maybe IHRT can offer them some insight as to how to become, “unconfused!”
Patient #1 was supposedly well following her “gasless surgery with Spraygel” procedure with Kruschinski, or someone, and was told by Kru that she did not have any adhesions in her second look procedure, but now Patient #1 is NOT well and looking to return to Germany for another surgery with “whomever.”
And Sandy chastised patients who so much as made a claim that they were not well after surgery with Kru, as SHE WAS well, and then she called them trolls for stating THEIR case! So it is written.
Patient #2 IS well, (Jan appears to be among a very few who reaped any benefit from a surgery with Kruschinski,) however, she cannot understand why those who were not well after Kru’s surgery are angry at him, after all SHE is well, so what’s the problem! And she too chastises patients for stating THEIR cases! So it is written.
It appears that neither of these “confused” women understands, nor perhaps accepts, that many, many, many patients to Kruschinski were:
A.) “told that they were cured and did not have adhesions in their second look laps!”
B.) lied to about Kruschinski’s adhesiolysis was BETTER & CHEAPER then they could get in the USA, (with exception to many 2-4 return “cash” follow-up procedures with Kruschinski for some of these patients, not that THEY matter to these two “confused” patents!)
C.) Better due to HIS “Gasless” procedure and “Spraygel,” and cheaper only if you’re a millionaire!
D.) Lets not forget that the patients were also lied to about the “statistics” of surgeries Kruschinski performed in HIS “clinical studies” using Confluent Spraygel, (which turned out to be that Kruschinski NEVER was part of or did any studies for Confluent.)
E.) Kruchinski claimed he did 4000 procedures with “gasless & Spraygel” in his harvesting patients to him, it is facts that he didn’t even perform the 400 he claimed he did in a scientific report which turned out to be bogus, and in Karen Stewards book, May 2007, he claims to have performed ONLY 200 “Gasless” surgeries with Spraygel!
F.) Kruschinski knew that the “Abdolift” was causing adhesions, yet NEVER mentioned that anywhere in his web site!
G.) Kruschinski conveniently omitted in his “patient lists” that many of the patients listed there returned for multiple surgeries to Endogyn, Helen Dynda included!
H.) Kruschinski also conveniently omitted that there wasn’t, “exactly” a real Institute “ or “Endogyn” other then on a web site..
I.) Kruschinski also conveniently omitted the FACT that he had been “dismissed” from 13 medical Kliniks in Germany prior to Emma Klinik!
J.) His “associated surgeons” list in Endogyn changed like the wind as did his “Endogyn” affiliations!
K.) Let’s not forget that the “Institute for Endoscopic Surgery” was as bogus as his “nurse/mistress’s” credentials were!
L.) Patient confidentiality was an unknown word to Kruschinski…however, it was a way to “promote” his business!
M.) Kruschinski’s claims that his “gasless” surgeries with “Spraygel” were in fact “experimental procedures” of his own accord! ( Most cases using 5-7 kits of Spraygel per surgery and STILL not being effective! DID Kru really used as much “Spraygel” as he charged YOU for, after all, all you ever saw was pictures of YOUR surgery!! Yeah, right, and IHRT has a bridge in the desert for sale, any takers? Sandy, Jan?)
This list can go on and on and on…
Well, now THAT was a full plate of facts to digest!
IHRT can see why these two patients got confused, as hey, these things aren’t all THAT important to someone seeking surgical intervention for one of the most infringing and horrendous medical conditions in the world today! Right ladies???
The best news is that more patients DID realize the validity of IHRT’s claims, and stopped going to “Con Kruschinski” and were NOT sucked in by the words of people who appear to be, “One Fry Short of a Happy Meal!”
IHRT suggests that these two patients try to read, and assimilate, what is in: The “Endogate papers”
http://www.adhesionrelateddisorder.com/Endogate-Papers.html
Stay tuned to IHRT for breaking News next week!
Daniel has finally awakened the sleeping giant of his demise.
OOHHH! AHHHHH!!!
