“Jip” aka “Kruschinski” put up a post he thinks people will fall for, and of course, it points to himself as being the genius behind all medical issues and the rest of the world is just now catching up!
Problem with the post is that it is like ALL the other things posted in Endogyn –
NO VALIDATION! Lot’s of words again, but no abstracts of the “article” being offered up in his message board, as usual!
IHRT supposes that Kruschinski’s “bad” habits are hard for him to change, and that he is still of the mind set that everyone else in the world is “dumb” and will believe anything he puts out that he himself thinks might be believable!”
Point is that some people visiting Endogyn message board are much wiser then he can accept, however, IHRT is also of the impression that Kruschinski himself believes anything he posts, after all, it appears that when you’re a pathological liar, there comes a time when fiction merges with facts, and even the liar can get confused!
(This is IHRT’s perception of the behaviors of “Pathological Liars,” no abstract ISavailable on this comment!)
Side note: Is it a coincidence that “Jip” is also the name of the “Gingerbread Boy” in the Candyland game After all “Kru” is King of “Sillystop!”
http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=p5MhBPux0KgMBsX2nUyfy436TW&forum=2&thread=12046
Posted Sunday, January 6, 2008 @ 11:43 AM
The following is part of an article in the Daily Mail of 30 October 2007 called
"STILL IN PAIN AFTER YOUR OP"।
............ "The failure to tackle this problem has cost us dear. Around 75 per cent of small bowel obstructions - fatal in 10 per cent of cases if not dealt with promptly - are adhesion-related.
Between 20 and 40 per cent of secondary infertility - women unable to conceive a second time - is because of adhesions, and some women are crippled with chronic pelvic pain caused by adhesions which can bind several organs together, causing traction and tugging on nerves.
The usefulness of adhesiolysis - surgery to cut loose the adhesions as a means of relieving severe abdominal or pelvic pain - is questionable in many cases।
Studies indicate it's a blunt tool in terms of pain relief, and in 85 per cent of cases adhesions will re-form afterwards.
And this is just as likely to occur following keyhole surgery। "I think we all hoped that by doing things by keyhole surgery we'd reduce the chance of adhesions," says Geoffrey Trew, a consultant in reproductive medicine and surgery at London's Hammersmith Hospital।
"We assumed that because it's less invasive, fewer adhesions wold be created because there would be no direct handling or rubbing of tissues, no packing the abdomen with big swabs and no drying out of tissues - all of which will cause adhesions।"
Instead, in colorectal and gynaecological surgery in particular, patients are just as likely to get adhesions with keyhole surgery because THE ABDOMEN IS BEING FILLED WITH VERY DRY CARBON DIOXIDE GAS TO VIEW THE BODY'S INTERNAL STRUCTURES। THIS GAS DRIES OUT THE DELICATE PERITONEAL SURFACES WHICH LINE THE ABDOMEN.
However, even though the vast majority of surgery patients will go on to develop adhesions, most of these will be dormant and won't cause problems। They may not be discovered until another operation is carried out - often years later.
This makes the subsequent surgery "much harder, lengthier and more risky," says Malcolm Wilson, a general surgeon at Manchester's Christie Hospital, because the adhesions must be cut through. This runs the risk of perforating the bowel, for example, to which they may have stuck.
Mr Trew is keen to raise awareness about adhesions among surgeons. "There is an abysmal lack of awareness of the scale of the problem," he says.
"Many surgeons are deluded when they claim their patients won't get adhesions, because they are inevitable unless surgeons take scrupulous steps to minimise them।" He urges patients who may be considering surgery to discuss with their surgeon the adhesion risk of the proposed operation।"
................
I think this is what Dr Kruschinski has been saying for some years.
As for discussing the risk of adhesions before an operation, I think most of us did not do this because we had never heard of adhesions until it was too late.
jip
Posted Sunday, January 6, 2008 @ 12:32 PM
This is the fatalism of our health systems and surgeons, it takes always some time until other surgeons realise the problem one is pointing out since years...
Thank you
--------------------Daniel Kruschinski, MD EndoGyn.com, Adhesions.de, Hysterectomy.de, Fibroids.de, Endometriosis.de, Lift-laparoscopy.com © by EndoGyn Ltd.
No comments:
Post a Comment