Kruschinski goes nuts it seems

Thank you tipster....very bizarre indeed. Like we've been saying all along, you want this guy at you with a scalpel as you sleep? Read on...
http://kruschinski.blogspot.com/

Terrifying! This should never have happened. Kruschinski Monster Endogyn

Please show this post to your medical professional. Imagine this poor patient trapped in a plastic surgery clinic in Germany. 8 major abdominal surgeries in a hospital with no ICU. You are so lucky to be alive. Do not even consider this surgeon as an option.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ADHESIOLYSIS #2

Some of the cases with “Frozen abdomen” are so severe that they present not only adhesions to the abdominal wall and between the bowel loops, but have all organs and bowel loops surrounded by a very dense connective tissue, glueing the organs together and causing constrictions of the bowel.

Those patients need a “Multi-Step-Adhesiolysis” according to the EndoGyn concept and are informed after the first procedure that we will work upon their symptoms in different abdominal quadrants by setting-up a multistep adhesiolysis according to their symptoms.

The first step always includes full adhesiolysis of the abdominal wall as these adhesions are often causing bowel obstructions. Also a partial interluminal adhesiolysis of the bowel loop adhesions is included in the first step.

So in January 2010 the patient was admitted again and we performed the 3rd look procedure on January 18th, 2010, followed by 7 other laparoscopic procedures due to an infection and to avoid reformation of adhesions.

We had to keep the patient for 31 days in the hospital and she had all together 8 surgeries performed.

- 18/01/2010: Gasless Lift-Laparoscopy as 3rd look

– 20/01/2010: 4th look
- 25/01/2010: 5th look
- 27/01/2010: 6th look
- 29/01/2010: 7th look
- 01/02/2010: 8th look
- 05/02/2010: 9th look
- 09/01/2010: 10th look

Please check the text under the images!

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN!

http://laparoscopyofadhesiolysis.com/adhesiolysis-worst-cases-case-1-adhesiolysis-1/

Kruschinski touts this proudly on one of his 400 * websites ( check "whois" to see exact amount of Endogyn domains owned). He is mad!

Kruschinski saw what Spraygel did and did nothing but ask you for more money for more surgery

Another Endogyn blast from the past. Undated info includes Sally and Lisa still by his side. I had a reaction to spraygel too...but no one seemed to care at that point. Sally's appendix is supposed to have bust on the plane back from Germany. This we believe as others had mysterious organ removals right after their surgeries at Endogyn. Perhaps it was the 7 kits of spraygel he used. The label say use 2 kits.

I feel he has seen and happily re operated on those who had complications from spray gel. After receiving complaints from Dr. Hanifa Koya, as she noticed an alarming rate of re operations and unusual scarring after using spraygel...the manufacturer quielty and with no stated reason, reformulated Spraygel into SprayShield.

....and Kruschinski saw, All those operations and then the re operations. One young man had 7 operations with Kruschinski till all his families money was gone and then he took his life as he still writhed in agony from all the unsuccessful surgeries.

IHRT often asks why are men going to a gynecologist anyways???

SO here you have an IHRT Blast from the Past that we can look at with clearer eyes.
Really, do not take this very expensive and dangerous chance with you life.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Monday, May 22, 2006


The" Two Faces" of Sally Grigg exposed!


Ladies at Endogyn: DO NOT read this post as there exists a possibility that you will not be “Happy Apples!”

IHRT has included additional material showing what appear to be some very dysfunctional people posting in Endogyn. Be warry of anything that is posted in Endogyn, as it is filled with emotion, dysfunction, miss-representations, and at times, actual lies, and it appears that these ladies do it to seek the attention and favor of "Kru!"

IHRT has said it before, and we will say it again, " Kru" is like a dirty uncle playing in a sandbox with little children so he can prey on their vulnerabilities to stroke his ego and sick needs of approval. A preditor in thier midst and that appears most evident when you read the behaviors of the "usuals" who post there! How could anyone take the words of people who display such dysfunctional behaviors and schedule a surgery with this "cheesy" "Kru" after listeneing to them "goo and coo over" him? That behavior alone is sic! (Note that even his patient have no respect for this man as a proffesional, calling him, "Kru!" Is this the type of person YOU would want performing surgery on you? YUCK!

IHRT guess's that they don't!

The" Two Faces" of Sally Grigg exposed!

Sally says one thing in public, and another thing in private! Her claims have more holes in it then “Swiss Cheese!” No wonder IHRT smells a rat!

Sally Grigg...So many miss-representations surrounding Sally’s surgeries in Endogyn, and what appear to be outright lies regarding Sally’s "reaction to the Spraygel,: and some type of "medication” to help get the Spraygel “out of her system!” Everything surrounding Sally appears to be in "crisis" mode! LOL. It appears that Sally wants to be the center of attention, even if it means she make things up so she “stands out of the crowd,” such as Sally appears to be doing here in these emails and posts. To say that “Kru” has almost 100% success,” is without ANY basis, yet Sally uses that to harvest innocent ARD patients to “Kru,” when she herself was still not well, and Sally has no intentions of telling people about it either! The whole thing was bogus and simply attention getting as NON of it had any basis to it at all!! Sally says in private, “So I guess I'm supposed to be quiet and be a good girl, until they decide what my body did.” Sally says in public, “If anyone wants to know anything about surgery with Dr. Kruschinski and his great skill, gasless methods, and spray gel, just email me at LostCst@mcn.org I'm happy to share any info I've got.”

Can YOU answer the Mystery?

Who lied when stating there were “DR’S involved in this case,” or “ that Sally’s body was HOLDING the Spraygel,” and that “Kru gave her medication to help RID her body of it.”

Possible answers: “Kru, in the operating with a scalpel,” or “Sally, on the ranch with pitch fork,” or “Jo, down under, spewing her words like a gossip standing at a fence!”

Who do you think is making up the greater “tale” in the following material surrounding Sally Grigg’s surgeries at Endogyn?

*****************************************

-----Original Message-----From:


Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:37 PM


To: G; Dr.Kruschinski@t-online.de


Subject: Sally Grigg


Gentlemen:The following message appeared on the IAS board today.I don't think this is very helpful or appropriate, or respectful to either Confluent or Dr. K - as per our recent correspondence, what possible medication could Sally be on that would "break down the gel"? Some suggestions please


Regards

*******************************

Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:19:57 -0600 (CST)

From: joanne@bombobeach.com (Jo)

To: ADHESIONS@OBGYN.NET

Subject: Sally Grigg is home from Germany!Message-ID: 200303080319.h283Jvo08403@mail.medispecialty.com

Hello everyone! I had a lovely surprise this morning - a phone call from our Californian friend Sally! Home from Germany just two days ago after her third major surgey in just a few short months.The only draw back to this surgery to remove adhesions after her burst appendix last year was a reaction to the SprayGel! Sally is the only person we know of who has had a reaction and it surprised everyone. Doctors believe Sally's body has possibly built up an immunity to the Gel and it didn't dissolve as it is designed to do and be dispelled from her body via her bladder.Sally is now taking medication to try and break down the gel so that it can be absorbed and then expelled from her body. She says that she feels a little strange but the second look surgery showed that no new adhesions have formed after the procedure! Let's hope and pray that Sally can get the SprayGel out of her system and doctors and the makers of SprayGel can work out why she had this unheard of reaction. Best wishes for a full recoveryLove & warm gentle hugs,Jo

*************************************

Original Message -----


From: Confluent Surgical


To: S; Dr.Kruschinski@t-online.deSent:


Monday, March 10, 2003 3:27 PM


Subject: RE: Sally Grigg


Dear D, Thanks for keeping all of in the loop here. I spoke to Bev today on a number of issues related to Sally Grigg. We have no idea what medication could have been given to this patient. As you know from your own testing, SprayGel is absorbed after 7 days so we don't know at Confluent what drug could be given to accelerate the absorption process.I also spoke to Dr. Reich today and he is going to talk to Dr. Kruschinski concerning a number of topics.


Thanks again for your involvement.

***************************************

From: Sally Grigg

To: D

Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 7:00 AM

Subject: Re: Sally Grigg

Sally Grigg wrote:

Dear D, Hi, how are you feeling? I hope you are doing better. I'm sorry I missed you in Germany. Wouldn't it be great if we could all get together. Anyway, I had another six hour surgery, all that pus from the burst appendix really did a bad thing, so many adhesions. But Daniel said they were easy compared to the last ones, these were not as imbedded in my organs. I did have some kind of weird reaction to the spraygel, but they are figuring it out. So I guess I'm supposed to be quiet and be a good girl, until they decide what my body did. LOL LOL Why me???? Sally Grigg LostCst@mcn.org

Hello, sweet friends, I'm home from Germany. Stronger this time. I was filled with adhesions from my appendectomy but they were soft. It still took six hours of great surgery and 7 kits of spray gel. I did have an inflamatory reaction to the spray gel this time. I'm probably the only person who has had it twice in a few months, but overall I'm well and happy. It's always hard to travel so far, but dear friends, we finally do have a cure, another miracle. Hopefuly no more operations for me. If anyone wants to know anything about surgery with Dr. Kruschinski and his great skill, gasless methods, and spray gel, just email me at LostCst@mcn.org I'm happy to share any info I've got. I'll write again soon, I've got 215 email messages waiting for me. Now I've got to find the few precious nuggets from friends and delete the crap. Please let me know how you all are. I know I've been bad not answering my emails, but life is so full, but I seem to be out of pain again, so hopefully life will be good. I came home to 3 adorable baby lambs and more on the way. They are soooooooo cute. Love you all and wish I had the money to send you to Dr. Kruschinksi. His success rate is almost 100%. That doesn't mean he makes you a new person, just adhesion free and having to deal with life. LOL Take care, all my love, Sally Grigg

*************************************

Endogyn updates:

Karen Steward is attempting to use her " smoke screen" method of taking the focus off the Sally Grigg material by throwing out "Law Suit!" No one can or will sue anyone else over posting on the Internet, and any attorney who will not take $5,000.00 to start a case, is extinct! " Kru" isn't worth the time to sue, nor can he be sued, tells you how much Karen knows! But Sally can, and I encourage anyone who feels that they were dupped by her, to email her and ask her questions as to why she miss-lead people like she did!!

Karen appears to be going "ballistic" trying to deal with everyone elses issues. Talk about controlling! LOL! LOL!

Lisa Graven’s recent post on Endogyn, where she is defending “Kru,” and all but gushing over him appears to be nothing short of dysfunctional behavior! Lisa talks of others being in love with “Kru,” but in order to accuse that, one must have entertained that idea within themselves in order to place it on others, fact is that it has to originate from somewhere, Lisa!

Obsessed? Look at you women, all of you women who gush over this cheesy charactor, that is just sic behavior and you claim others are guilty of it, but not yourself, what is all of this in YOUR post if it isn't obsessive behavior. Lisa? Your obsession with "Kru" still exists years later, and isn't geared at helping people, just tooting the horn of someone who abused you! Also notice that this "love" accusation is thrown around quite a bit, making IHRT wonder just what kind of women can fall in love with the “cheesy” looking “Kru!” (Another Mystery!)

Look how highly “Kru” speaks about his, “ladies,” like he did for Lisa Graven, who bent over backwards to get patients to him! What kind of a person would allow someone to treat them this way, and then “gravel” back at their feet? This is no mystery, as it appears that is it someone like Lisa Graven!”

http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=IXbn4yP3PZpS5PehAFN0fRCmI8&forum=2&thread=2346

ATTENTION Potential Patients to ENDOGYN and Kruschinski...

Read below as this could very well happen to you if you don't keep your mouth shut!!!!

---Original Message -----

From: Lilylover5555@aol.com

To: Dr.Kruschinski@t-online.de ; olddad66@runestone.net ; lostcst@mcn.org ;

Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:36 PM

Subject: Re: Fw: Misleading issues on the IAS web site and at Bombobeach web sites

Lisa Graven> Hello Everyone,I see that you all received the same email from Daniel. I am deeply disturbed that he portrays me as a stressed out alcoholic that smokes!!!!... nothing could be farther from the truth! I told him he needs to get his facts correct before he says things like that to so many!! I need to clarify that what he says about me, simply IS NOT true! THE ONLY REASON alcohol was brought up in my situation is because I was told that I had chronic pancreatitis, and we were looking for a cause! I do drink OCCASSIONALLY, if we go out for dinner,I may have a drink or two, sometimes not any. We OCCASSIONALLY "party" with friends when we get together, but I consume no more than 3-4 drinks , sometimes not even that! So yes I do drink alcohol, MAYBE 4-7 drinks a month...I didn't realise this is a factor, and I'm the only one that drinks occassionally!I have had alot of stress in my life this year, more than usual. I've had problems with my immediate family(son) and my extended family (father) but most of that stress was last fall, some residual I guess, but like everyone else, you learn to deal with it, adjust to the changes and move on...I'm not a complete mess because of the stress in my life...Yes, I do smoke(i know, shame on me), but is that a factor in adhesion formation??? I was deeply offended by Daniel's portrayal of me, and I want to be sure you all know his opinion is wrong!!! Thanks for listening, Lisa

IHRT says>"And today look at Lisa, all but drooling over "Kru!"

*****************************************************

The fact of the matter is that IHRT will continue to point out the issues that only serve to harm ARD patients seeking information about Endogyn, as what is found in Endogyn, is worthless, miss-leading information regarding an under qualified surgeon who lacks the skills to perform a high quality adhesiolysis, as IHRT sees it, and IHRT will watch closely to see when. more probable, IF "Kru" follows up on his claims of performing adhesiolysis in the Caymans, and having "guest" surgeons to Endogyn! Claims by "Kru" are always left dangling!

IHRT predicts that these claims will never be realized by "Kru," let alone his patients! Mark our words, or, perhaps, "sue us!"

Stayed tuned to IHRT for a discussion on: The Current “Status” of Endogyn, 2006

Posted by IHRT at 6:06 PM

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook2 comments:

Anonymous said...

hello



May 23, 2006 3:32 PM

Anonymous said...

She helped convince me to go to some extent but it was Lisa Graven who really persisted and I went.

Totally regretable choice and was worse for the trip.

I fouind out later she was not well when she was trying to "get me there"

I wonder if I was the partial payment for her trip back and she's still not well, Daniel told her then something about her having PID which cause the problems back, several others got the pid excuse too. It's generally sexually transmited or from surgical infection.

He said I had a reaction to spraygel which was not true. He said I had a post surgical drain and that was not true. He said I was adhesion free and that was SO not true because I had to have surgery here a few months later and I had tons old calcified adhesions! Uh maybe he needs better glasses...nowait a better visual field so he could see em but the abdolift tents the abdomen and he cant see like an inflated abdomen like in a regular laproscopy....so you might be adhesion free but only where he can see........so you go all that way for nothing!

Kruschinski continues to harvest ARD patients to Endogyn with temptations of food and babies...Karen still the Golum

An IHRT blast from the past. Still all true as the day it was written...now with pictures of babies to lure in the desparate, vulnerable sufferers of Adhesion Related Disorder.

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Golem and his Shabbat Goy

Mysteries of "Endogyn" reveled! ( By: Beverly J. Doucette & Dawn Rose 2/29/06)

The "why's of everything" that occurs surrounding "Endogyn" reveled, and in absolute truth!

Daniel Kruschinski finally gives up the answers and in his own words!


The answers to the following behaviors witnessed out of "Endogyn" and ascribed to this one man will all be explained at the end of this post! (PLEASE!! Proceed with caution as this is NOT just another "issue" regarding Daniel Krucshinski, but rather one of the most reveling bits of information about him that outweighs any credentials, success or "inventions" he claims to have. ( As a matter of fact, it outweighs anything he claims or could claim about himself!)

Today, stands out as the most sad and heart retching day we have had here in IHRT! Realization hit Dawn and Beverly right between the eyes after we saw information located in the Endogyn web site that was brought to our attention yesterday!


When we scrolled down to the area of concern in the "Endogyn" web site, we were shocked, absolutely horrified at what we encountered there, and nothing really prepared us for it, yet, when we saw and read Daniels own words, we realized that we had our answer to the many things that seem to surround this surgeon when it comes to his interactions with persons afflicted with ARD!

We also realized that of ALL the surgeons throughout the world, that we are aware of, who present via a website to advertise themselves in the world of ARD, this website presentation is the worse thing we have ever encountered!

Many of Daniels patient interactions are aggressive and controlling, they are pushy at the least, it is easily recognized when he doesn’t want a subject to be on his message board, he simply shuts them down with a few course and firm words. (See below: Daniels Speaks!!! But he doesn’t answer the questions, and Karen cringes at his feet!) Even his "groupies" grovel at his feet like "Golum" of the "Lord of the Ring" movie! (See below: Gollum)


Daniel is known to publicly share some of the most personal information about a patient who is not happy with his surgical outcome, and has no hesitation to try to discredit them as being "drug addicts" "alcoholics," "hypochondriacs" or any other derogatory words he can muster as he tries to overshadow their experiences with his surgery if they are notportrayed by the patient as positive ones, and this is all in the Endogyn web site! (If he removed it from his web site, we have it and will gladly link you to where it remains.)

We find that Daniel, in absence of credentials & validations, instead uses what amounts to bribes to lure patients to surgeries at Endogyn. Visit this website and you will find a select few who post on it who never share credentials or validations of Daniels adhesiolysis, but rather, they embellish his "skills" with banter and chanting to rev up a prospective patient and "smoke screen" them from asking any REAL questions about his skills and surgical outcomes, rather they repeat information surrounding only 1 or 2 surgeries of his, and by creating a circus environment on that message board, these patients are blindsided, and pulled into the circus to such a degree that the truth about the surgeries are never really exposed. (Test this out, if you dare! However, WE can show you how they execute this maneuver!) Another sad truth is that if any of them push for real concrete answers to questions regarding his adhesiolysis or outcomes of the same, they are put down fast, and not just by Daniel, but by these few ladies who always come to his aid, the same ladies over and over again! (Most of whom are not well after their own surgical experiences with him. In fact, even some of these patients have been convinced by him that if they keep coming back to HIM, he will eventually have all the adhesions lysed, except for the ones his "hook" creates, but then again, he is upfront about that!)

(Adhesion Message Board:

"http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=Lhjhvx8A8CmKRsbXBYNESs1s7D&action=&forum=&thread=&user=&query=&msgid=&page=&sort=&do=&key=&others=)

We find Daniel responding to every "prospective" patient with an "eagerness" of enthusiasm and fanaticism of promises, and lots of concern and medical gibberish, at first meeting that is! The more he has the patient in his grip, the more controlling and calculating his emails become! When the patient is so firmly in his grip, he turns nasty, but by then the patients are so fearful of "losing" their only hope of ever getting well, they are stuck, like a fly in the spiders web…only, this web is "Endogyn" and there is more then one fly coming to get them! (Test this out, if you dare! However, WE can show you how they execute this maneuver!)

We also find another VERY disheartening scheme that Daniel uses on his website that "absolutely 100%" NO other surgeon in this world would ever even consider doing when addressing the agony of ARD symptoms shared by those afflicted with it! Daniel uses pictures of food, and lots of it, to lure some of the most desperate and suffering patients into his operating room!

(http://www.adhesions.de/index.php?seite=verw&sprache=en&a=PatientsInfo&b=Picsofsocialevents&c=Foodtest)

This is one of the most despicable and cruel acts ever used to lure patients who cannot eat, from a person within the medical field, we have encountered anywhere in the world! Dawn and I can tell you that his promises of you being able to eat this stuff after HIS adhesiolysis procedure, is NOT the truth, by far! (We have many posts from his patients stating that they are not able to eat like he claimed they would after a surgery with him! Want to see the posts? We have them! Daniel, prove us wrong here with factual validation!)

Though we could go on and on presenting bogus material off of Endogyn’s web site, we will finish today’s message with this message as it is most imperative that we expose the truth of this matter verses what is presented in Daniels web site, which is an "embellishment" of the facts, as ussual!


ANY and ALL claims of clinical studies, experimental procedures or research studies that Daniel claims to have done or be involved in right now, ARE NOT governed by anyone but himself..

(http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/331/7510/178-d)

In fact, Daniel answers to no one but himself, and it is in this truth as shared to the world by HIM on HIS web site, that we now understand what can only be called "unscrupulous behaviors" exhibited by him to persons afflicted with ARD! We are certain this same behavior is exhibited in his behaviors over all as when it is a part of you, you do not change whether your in an operating room with a scaple in your hand, or drinking in a bed with someone other then your wife!!

Remember people, you can hide yourself for a while, but NOT forever! Your the same person no matter where you are and eventually, the REAL you will emerge!


All these "claims" being amde in Endogyn’s wed site are unsubstantiated, not credible, offer no validations, no credentials, material with false claims, pictures of foods are used to torment the hunger of those who cannot eat, traps are set that play on the symptoms of very ill, desperate people, and all meant to lure potential patients to an unproven surgery, to this man, and for these reasons only, "self gain and greed!"

We know this today because Daniel told us, this is because of any surgeon we have ever known in the world of ARD, Daniel HAS no scruples!" All other surgeon we know of have "scruples!" Even if they cannot offer a high quality adhesiolysis, and even if they do make the attempts at it and fail, one thing they do posses that Daniel doesn’t, is the professionalism to keep their religious beliefs, or lack of them private! At least, if these surgeons do not allow Jesus into their operating rooms to guide their hands and give strength and healing to their patients, at least they keep it to themselves!

The answer to everything at Endogyn is in this link!


"We can’t rely on him… LOL"

http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=PPhuT1jJNwQuwoh8CT7vJJMCeb&forum=2&thread=873

Though Daniel makes light of our "Lord, Jesus Christ" being present at a surgery with him, for those of us who are Christian and hold in our hearts all the offers of prayers being said for us, and wishes of "God Speed" as we face yet another surgery, it IS a meaningful issue! Our Lord, Jesus, being with us during a surgery IS one of the most important things we have to hold onto when in a surgery, and though we turn to our Lord Jesus in all things, it is in this surgery where we are the most needy of his presence in our lives, as do our loved ones, so far away.

Daniel might find this a joke, and he express’s that he does not have Jesus in his life, which is his prerogative, but to make fun of this and to draw a parrel that Jesus is NOT part of his surgical team because HE doesn’t have Jesus in HIS life, well, this is the ultimate act of egotism and greed we have ever found within the medical community world wide!


We ask you to take a minute when you visit this page in Endogyn, and ask yourself just what IS Daniel saying here? Is he claiming that he alone will make the difference in the outcome of your surgery, and if so, that too okay, however, is he boosting that he is not Christian, is he belittling those of us who are Christian orientated, is a non-Christian less of a human being then HE is as a member of his Jewish faith, and does HE treat a non-Christian patient differently then he treats a Christian patient? And, yes, he would know who was who, as Christians talk freely of their Lord Jesus when facing a surgery!

It is one thing to not be a Christian, which is really neither here or there, unless you MAKE it an issue as Daniel has, however, to discredit our Lord Jesus as being an integral part of a Christians surgery, is just plan wrong, and to do it in such a public and frivolous way it is scary!!

Any surgeon who can post such a thing on his own public web site advertising HIS surgery and at the same time ridicule the Christian faith, lacks true compassion, respect, and professionalism, let alone the decision making qualities necessary when dealing with a human life under anesthetic and his scalpel!

I also want to point out that the "groupies" who lend themselves to Daniels web site not only condone this behavior publicly, as well as compromised themselves as being recognized as reaching out to others with a Christian heart!

It cannot be two ways, either you agree with Daniels bashing of Jesus, or you walk! We will know!

Most important, YOU already know!

But the good news is this,

" No matter where you go, or what you do in your life, as long as YOU have Jesus with you, he IS with you and no one can come between that. Daniel might be able to keep our Lord Jesus out of his heart and surgeries, but he does not posses the power to keep him out of that operating room and surrounding YOU with his love and the prayers of all who are praying for you!"

"Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." - Revelation 3:20

Jesus bashing is simply intolerable, and needs to be taken into consideration when you think about a surgery at Endogyn! Remember this, any understanding of Jesus Christ being an integral part of your life goes out the window the first time you encounter Daniel Krusinski!

Is THIS the surgeon you want operating on you?

" For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God." ROM 10:3

God does not put people on paths, people are given a free will, they make choices, some good, some not so good, but choices, unhindered by even our Lord, but OUR choices just the same! It is sad to read stuff like the this post in Endogyn, where people who believe in Jesus simply put it ALL in his hands thus freeing themselves of all responsibility of what happens to them! In this case, this lady is well on her way to a terrible future, after being lured by false material and claims, she has fallen victim to Daniel and his "groupies!"

What she will have in her favor, and need, is her Lord, that is if she doesn’t place the blame on him instead of her surgeon, where it belongs, however, she did not do her homework effectively prior to going to Endogyn, thus she too is responsible for what is to come! Karen is a tough "spider" to avoid, so "Heart" had a formidable foe on the attack and cannot be blamed for wanting what was offered!

http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=HCYcePGBr7Jc1qvEVjL37cMqIi&forum=2&thread=2219

Posted Sunday, February 5, 2006 @ 00:37 AM )
Karen,
I hope this is my aswer, Germany that is, at least he cares and that is so much more than most doctors that I have gone to. I am excited and hope to finalize my trip this week, if money comes in. My son came home from college today and all I could say is I hurt. He said," Wow, mom, can you believe your still in pain?" Everyday I think wow, what happened to me; wish I would have never had a hysterectomy. But I believe GOD has put me on this path, and I believe that I wil find a cure. Thanks for caring.

Warm Regards,
Heart

Daniels Speaks!!!(But he doesn’t answer the questions, and Karen cringes at his feet!)

http://www.endogynserver.com/cgibin/210/cutecast.pl?session=RrBKJviTfhXPx65bW6PPtZPIWg&forum=2&thread=2245

Posted Thursday, February 16, 2006 @ 01:00 PM
HELP Which works best: debit or credit card or Euros. We have been told debit and credit cards are accepted and are the easy way to go and now my daughter heard that they are not accepted and need more Euros that we are taking? What has been the experience of you all out there. Thanks

Posted Friday, February 17, 2006 @ 01:38 AM
my gosh, please relax ...

if we take US$ or travellers cheques, we go to the Internet, take the exchange rate and thats it.

Regarding all the payment, I even dont charge what the bank is charging me for money wire from US to Germany.

We are trying to make it all as convienient as possible to you all...

What is the exact question here ? I dont see the question ?

--------------------
Daniel Kruschinski, MD)

Posted Friday, February 17, 2006 @ 10:29 AM
Dr. Kruschinski, Thanks for the clarification and for your efforts to make the trip as hassle free as possible

(At the request of mmf, and her editing/deleting of previous comments she had made, I have deleted my prior posting which had included her comments.)

[Edit by gingirl on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 @ 12:00 PM]

--------------------
Karen

Gollum is a withered, tortured and wrought wretched ghoulish creature created by the lure of "One Gold Ring!" For us, it is easy to make the comparison of some of Daniels "groupies!" (Those who post continuously chanting their praises for him, as they harvest, ever so diligently, patients for him by using misrepresentations of his skills to lure people to him, as they do it for a few "strokes" from him as it is never done with the use of truth and validations!) http://www.creative-escape.org/gollum/

the following information located in the Endogyn web site was brought to our attention yesterday!

http://www.endogynserver.com/cgi-bin/210/cutecast.pl?session=PPhuT1jJNwQuwoh8CT7vJJMCeb&forum=2&thread=873

Karen wrote: "To XXXXX: there is a cure for many people. (there is no cure and no effective adhesion barrier and the abdolift CAUSES adhesions)  My daughter has been totally and completely well 8 years now. (what about subesequent bowel obstrtuction you say in your book, what of melissa claiming to still have PCOS and a c-section and our question is, did she present to Kruschinski with a j pouch?) Prior to our trip to Germany, she suffered-horribly, I might add-14 years. David Wiseman, of the IAS (adhesions.org) phoned me in 2003 and told me to STOP sharing my joy about my healed daughter on his message board. He was quite furious and ranting about my postings causing so many to go to Germany for help. At that time, it was an open forum. (Postings are now screened, i.e, controlled). David also wanted me to give HIM the rights to my daughter's story that he said he had "heard" I was writing. Please see IAS archives for the real truth He demanded that I meet with him. (He is two hours from me). I refused. I did, however, willingly leave that message board. But, that was not good enough.

Days later, David posted at his message board (I have a screen shot of his posting if anyone wants to see it; just message me) that Beverly Doucette and Dawn Rose were resigning from the IAS. Within days, they began the smear campaign against Dr. K and me. For me, my God is bigger than the evil of men (and women). God has gifted Dr. Kruschinski. Period. He gets some of the most difficult; often hopeless cases. One woman in my area who is 46 years old was told to get her affairs in order, as she was dying from an abdomen of CONCRETE. Her organs were hardly functioning. Melissa and I attended/helped with a fundraiser for her and she went to Germany. That was last April. She doubted she would even live to make the trip! I spoke to her just yesterday and she was at the hospital awaiting the birth of her niece. This woman needs additional surgery, they all seem to end up going back or living in the stae that Kruschinski left them in when they cant come up with 30 grand or so more as happens in some cases of severe adhesions. But, she is another story of literally being pulled from the brink of death. She only wanted her life extended long enough so the grandson she is raising can get a little older. God has answered her prayers.

The Bible says we (those who accept and live for Christ) do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against spiritual wickedness and the powers of this dark world. Where there is good, evil will rise against it. One thing no one can change is the story of my child going from a hellish life to one of complete and totally happiness. I wish it for all."

Beware of the Abdo-lift....

Abdominal wall lift decreases cardiopulmonary changes, does not influence the morbidity and, increases operating time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It cannot be recommended routinely
.Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR.Published Online: July 16, 2008.Several physiological parameters related to heart and lung (cardiopulmonary changes) occur during insufflation of abdomen (tummy) with key-hole surgery. While these changes can be tolerated by normal individuals, patients with poor heart or lung function may not tolerate the changes. These changes in physiological parameters related to heart and lung are decreased by using special instruments to lift the front wall of the abdomen so that key-hole surgery can be performed without gas insufflation. In this systematic review of 20 trials including 706 patients (six trials including 156 patients used gas at very low pressures), it is shown that the technique of lifting the front wall of the tummy is associated with increased operating time (8 minutes) without reducing surgical complications. It cannot be recommended as a routine in patients with mild or no systemic disease. So, it cannot be recommended routinely in patients with low anaesthetic risk.
http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD006574/abdominal-wall-lift-decreases-cardiopulmonary-changes-does-not-influence-the-morbidity-and-increases-operating-time-in-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy.-it-cannot-be-recommended-routinely

What Daniel Kruschinskis Peers think of him Endogyn ~ Don't go!

What do Daniel Kruschinski's peers think of him? Well in this vote to enter the PAX society....he is tied for dead last! The world his peers use to describe him best is FREAK

In the voting, Belgium and gynaecologists were probably over-represented. After consultation have been considered elected the 4 highest ranking surgeons and 5 gynaecologists. We wish to congratulate all the candidates and thank them for their support to PAX society by standing for election.

Overal statistics
Total PAX Society mailing list: 4289
Number allowed to vote: 3891 (i.e. those registered before monday 19th of march).
Number who did vote : 143, or 3.68 % of all allowed to vote.
Total number of surgeons: 2369
Total number of basic scientists: 115
Total number of gynaecologists 1540
Total number of others 265


Final results
Candidate: Result
Adamian Leila 65 45.5 % (submitted) 1.7 % (total)
Angioni Stefano 42 29.4 % (submitted) 1.1 % (total)
Audebert Alain 65 45.5 % (submitted) 1.7 % (total)
Bhanuprasad Buparelia 11 7.7 % (submitted) 0.3 % (total)
Canis Michel 101 70.6 % (submitted) 2.6 % (total)
Coccia Maria Elisabetta 41 28.7 % (submitted) 1.1 % (total)
Crowe Alison 45 31.5 % (submitted) 1.2 % (total)
D'Hoore Andre 51 35.7 % (submitted) 1.3 % (total)
Diamond Mike 66 46.2 % (submitted) 1.7 % (total)
Dizerega Gere 68 47.6 % (submitted) 1.7 % (total)
Gomel Victor 77 53.8 % (submitted) 2.0 % (total)
Jeekel Hans 51 35.7 % (submitted) 1.3 % (total)
Koh Charles 47 32.9 % (submitted) 1.2 % (total)
Koninckx Philippe 122 85.3 % (submitted) 3.1 % (total)
Kruschinski Daniel 32 22.4 % (submitted) 0.8 % (total)
Mais 37 25.9 % (submitted) 1.0 % (total)
Miserez Marc 56 39.2 % (submitted) 1.4 % (total)
McVeigh Enda 48 33.6 % (submitted) 1.2 % (total)
Molinas Roger 80 55.9 % (submitted) 2.1 % (total)
Shalev Eliez 32 22.4 % (submitted) 0.8 % (total)
Van Der Wat Johan 44 30.8 % (submitted) 1.1 % (total)
Van Goor Harry 41 28.7 % (submitted) 1.1 % (total)
Verguts Jasper 65 45.5 % (submitted) 1.7 % (total)

So you want to go to Germany and have surgery with Kruschinski based on false hopes offered by Karen Steward??

Sunday, March 12, 2006

Another website to warn patients of Dr. Kruschinski

Tonya and I were fooled into thinking she was saved, but she is much worse now. It has been escalating very fast in the last couple weeks, as adhesion sufferers know can happen after a surgery. It started coming back two months ago, and is getting worse faster and faster every day.

My name is Dan Nordquist and anything you hear about Tonya and her experience in Germany, that you don't read on this site is probably a lie. We are going to post our entire story here within the next couple weeks to reveal the truth. Not only will Tonya tell her story, I will tell mine. I was there in Germany with her and I know the truth.

I could go on and on about the lies and slander my wife is being subjected to right now, but I want to put all the information in a legible and easy to follow format, and make sure we don't miss anything or misstate anything right now.

Look for our story here in it's entirety very soon. For now, please read the following email communication if you're contemplating going to Germany for surgery.

Below is the email I sent to Dr K in Germany in response to his insult to me.


Daniel,

Your childish attempt to insult means nothing to me, but it certainly shows what kind of man you are.

Everything Tonya wrote in that email is the truth, and you most certainly know that it's simply the same thing that has happened to virtually every woman who has come to you in desperation, only to be fooled by your manipulating boasts and lies. I don't know what goal you're are aiming for, but it can't be to help people, because you wouldn't be doing the things you do if you had that in mind. We were lured to Germany with the promise of good treatment and the possibility of my Tonya being adhesion free for the rest of her life. What we didn't know was that the women who had been to you before we went were keeping silent because they were coerced into it and that anyone who spoke against you was bannished from internet boards and belittled by you and people who still believed in you. I challenge you to give me JUST ONE VERIFIABLE NAME of a woman who was been under your knife at least 6 months ago and is still adhesion free. Your boasts of 98.9% success come from where??? I ask if you think Tonya was a success??? Her adhesions have not only returned, but there are more painfull places on her body now than she had before you performed surgery on her. She didn't want to believe it, and neither did I, so we tried to pass her old and new pains off as sugery pain that hadn't healed yet, or phantom pains, or anything but adhesions. But as time goes on, we cannot deny the same old tearing and pulling that she's oh, so familiar with, from her adhesions in the past. We have also found out recently that the abdolift that you supposedly invented also causes complications and that is why the US decided to use gas instead.

Also, yes, Tonya did send you a nice email explaining her pain. In fact, I'm pasting it here to refresh your memory:

"From: Tonya Nordquist
To: Dr.Kruschinski@t-online.de
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: IMPORTANT INFO....

Dear Dr. K,

I went to my gyno last Tuesday and I have been having some pain in my stomache again. I've thought that it was just constipation and "phantom pains" but the truth is that he and I think I have some adhesions again. I've held off on telling anyone because I was in denial. I still feel really good and I can do all the things that I love to do, but I have two places in my stomache that if I stretch I can feel where they start and end. I was afraid to tell Dan but after a night of real pain, I decided to bring up that my gyno thinks that I have them back too. I will not discredit you in any way. I'm still glad that I had the surgery with you and at least I'm not in the kind of pain that I was in when I first saw you. I hope that you can understand that I have to tell you the truth. I think you will appreciate me coming forth with this and not just hiding it. I don't know if I should post it on the board or not. I feel like others should know about it, but I have held off on telling anyone until I spoke to you first. I want you to know that this is very hard to tell you. When Dawn first started writing about her pain, I was angry with her for doing so. But then it made me think that I was living a lie too. I have been feeling good, but I know that I'm not telling the complete truth by saying that I have no pain. It started when I was in Mexico on my honeymoon with Dan. I got constipated and started feeling a little pain in my stomache. Then when we got home July 2nd, I was feeling a little more and a little more. I do not have to take meds for it yet and I pray that it will not get worse. Please know that I'll not slander your good name, but I feel that my friends need to know that there is a possibility that the adhesions may come back when you have endo. I never knew that I had endo until my gyno looked at the pictures that you took and said that I was covered in it. He told me that the chances of my adhesions returning were very high. I didn't know this. So I've been thinking that any pain was just a "phantom pain". I hope this will not ruin our relationship as I will never hurt your name in any way. I'm not sorry that I went to have surgery with you and in fact, it gave me back my life. I don't know if this will get worse or not, but I will keep you posted of my health issues.

With kindest reguards,
Tonya Nordquist"

You responded with acusations and insults. And I quote:

"Dear Tonya,
first of all: your gyn can't know when adhesions come back, is he a god
??? looking on pictures and says you have adhesions ???"

You then went on to offer a "free" third look surgery to "see" if there were adhesions. You also tried to make her gynocologist seem like he was trying to discredit you and push the "good" results down. I know you can't understand what adhesions feel like any more than I can, but THESE WOMEN DO! Don't you realize that after 5 or 6 or 7 surgeries that a woman can recognize what is going on in her body by then? They don't need a doctor to open them up and show them the adhesions that they already know are there. Tonya and I have discovered many facts about you since we have returned from Germany. Since Tonya's pain has come back, we are discovering MUCH more.

People are being told to keep quiet about recurring symptoms??? And I quote:

"From: Karen (last name deleted for this email since it will be shared with others)
To: rainchild@cableone.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:32 AM
Subject: hi

Hi Tonya,


Thanks for the nice reply.....and thanks for understanding
that I needed to tell you not to bring up the Michaela issue.
I promised Daniel a long time back it was forgotten, so
I want that to be true!!


There have been so many negative things happening to
Daniel that are coming from the IAS, Dawn, Beverly, etc......
I think you need to be VERY careful what you share concerning
your operation, experience, etc. I think the truth is important
and we should be able to share our true experience, however,,,,,,"
From Karen Steward



You have offered third looks to many other women??? Again, I have to ask where your supposed 98.9% success rate comes from??? I challenge you again to give me just one verifiable name of a woman who's been under your knife at least 6 months ago and is still adhesion free.

It appears that everything that is allowed to surface by you and your followers are geared to get more women to Germany, and anything you don't like is deleted (yes, EVEN ON YOUR SITE where you supposedly allow free speech), demeaned, discredited or pushed aside in any way possible so people who need help will trust you and put there lives in your hands for your selfish purposes.

I could go on and on but I don't believe it will help. Suffice it to say that I AM a man. A man who truly cares for and loves his wife. A man who will never allow another butcher to touch her.


----- Original Message -----
From:
To: "Dan Nordquist"
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: YOUR BEST DAY !!!


Dan !
Are you a man ?
What's that ?
Only 2 days after she wrote me a nice email ???
I can't understand such a unhuman thing ...
***********************


From: Tonya Nordquist
To: Beverly J.Doucette
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 2:13 PM
Subject: Urgent!!!


Dear Beverly,

I come to you out of fear and regret. My name is Tonya. I was the 16
thAmerican patient to go for surgery with Dr. K. I am in pain and have
come forward with this info to first of all, Dr. K, and now the people that I
have been in contact in telling them not to go to Germany, but I had no
idea that there was so much more going on than I could of ever imagined.
Thru a mutual person that we both know, I recieved your letter to "Crissy" and
have
read the entire contents. I am in agreeance that no one should go to
him.
But I have a question: I have seen gauze being used in 4 pictures that
were
taken during my 1st surgery. I have pain around my belly button to the
point that I cannot wear any article of clothing that touches this skin.
The pain is getting worse on a daily basis and I'm fearing that I have
been injured thru the proscess of the Abdo Lift....which I was also told Dr. K
invented. I recently found out that this is not true .....I believe the
first one invented is in Ohio. I am at my wits end. I don't care who
knows
about this letter. I don't care who you tell, just please tell others not
to go.....it's not worth it as I once "shouted from the roof tops" on Dr.
K's website. I feel like a complete idiot and have begged for
forgiveness
to those who were the butt of my harsh words. For the most part, I
have
kept my mouth shut as to what really happened in Germany to me. But
I will
not any longer. I had so many complications after my surgery. First of
all, I was hemorraging for at least one full day after he took out my
drain
and he finally put in two more stitches to control the bleeding.....I was
soaking thru 6 huge, thick gauze pads within minutes, my blood
pressure was
in the 40s on both top and bottom numbers, I was hallucinating,
throwing up
and yet Dr. K demanded that i walk around and "stop just laying there
like
that" as he acted out how I was acting, humiliating me infront of the
nurses, my husband, my room partner. I felt like I was dying and I was
told
to get up and walk to make my own blood pressure rise thru exercize. I
had
to make the nurses put on a blood pressure cuff on me to find out why I
felt
like I was leaving my own body. I told my husband that I felt like I was
dying. The nurses called Dr. K in the middle of the night to tell him that
I was going down hill fast to please come to the hospital, but he chose
not
to come until the next day. I had soaked my bed with blood many
many times
before he put in those two stitches. When I had my second look, I was
cut
open twice, not once, because for days, I had hemorraged inside and
was
filled up with blood that he said he rinsed out very carefully. I had a
bruise for two to three months after surgery that just now has
completely
left and the pain on my pubic bone is now finally gone. I thought "wow,
this was a very crude surgery, but it must just be thier tecqunices here
in
Germany." I made up every excuse in the book why the pain was still
there.
I even told my husband that it was just from me eating too much
cheese, or
not drinking enough water.....I drink about 1/2 to 1 gal of water a day on
the average day. I have tried to tell everyone how wonderful Dr. K was
until the day that I wrote to him telling him that I have pain and he was
defensive. I have not wrote to him again and I don't think that I owe
that
man any explanation. I was told to be hush hush about anything that
happened to me while in Germany. So I have been, but I'm not going
to be
any more. Please help me understand the seriousness of this surgery
with
the abdo lift. I am in a daze just in denial and then a sobbing mess on
the
floor, and then back to the realization that it's not my fault that I didn't
know. Please help me! I'm so scared!

Thank you for your words. I'm at a complete loss now as I do not know
what
my future holds. I do know this, I will discourage anyone that is
thinking
about going to NOT GO TO GERMANY!!! If my story will help others,
please
use it.

Tonya
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I would like to state a few things for the record right off the bat. In recent emails and web site postings, Dr. K and Karen are accusing Tonya of having mental problems in an attempt to discredit her, but I think her husband (Me) would know if that were the case, but it is definitely not so. She is angry, not insane. She had problems for the first 24 hours after surgery in Germany and she was hallucinating from the incredibly strong drugs they gave her, and had very, very low blood pressure, and we were afraid she was going to die. She was terrified and so was I. Dr K also states that there was no endo, but I have a journal entry from the day after Tonya's first surgery that mentions how Dr K told me she had endo and that's what probably caused the adhesions on the back of her liver. I was there with her. I know the truth, and people thinking of going to Germany need to know the truth.

Adhesion Related Disorder International Human Rights Team IHRT: Karen Steward writes "Autobiography" Is she confessing her love with Dr. Kruschinski after all?

Adhesion Related Disorder International Human Rights Team IHRT: Karen Steward writes "Autobiography" Is she confessing her love with Dr. Kruschinski after all?

Endogyn Kruschinski and Steward More of ENDOGATE

From http://www.adhesionrelateddisorder.com/Endogate-Papers.html  

“IHRT is hoping that for once we are NOT correct in our stand regarding what appears to be "bogus" claims made to harvest persons afflicted with ARD to Endogyn, as if we are, many, far to many victims of ARD, have been victimized again......... We, at IHRT, DO in fact, proclaim ourselves the defenders of those afflicted with ARD, and we will continue our quest to stomp out the injustices dealt them wherever it continues to exist in the world, indeed as we are their defenders... PLEASE remember this if you do not go any further in this message!
MANY of Daniels patients have returned home with reports from him stating they had NO adhesions in the second look! Within a few weeks or months, they are left wondering why and what is causing pain that seems to be from “adhesions,” but how could it be if they were adhesion free when they left Germany! These patients start the same process of diagnostic tests, pain medications, fears that this pain is for life and NOT from adhesions, do not be to quick to claim a success out of Endogyn as in doing this without giving yourself time to REALLY know if in fact you did receive a “clean” peritoneum from a surgery at Endogyn, what your doing is feeding information and hope to a very desperate and suffering group of people who will do everything they can to get there for their “miracle,” only to learn to late that YOUR story wasn’t as good as you represented it to be! They turn to Daniel with questions, only to be offered another surgery, at a discount, and if this is refused him, watch out! (You will see why I say this!)

http://www.adhesionrelateddisorder.com/Dawn-Rose-Op-Reports.html

It is my desire, if not my duty to try to talk to you with some candor about what is happening at Endogyn, Emma Klinic, Frankfurt, Germany under the auspices of Daniel Kruschinski. This isn’t the first time I have approached this subject, and the times prior to this can be found recorded in black and white, within IHRT.
Back in 2003, & 2004, I was accused of unjustly “persecuting” Daniel Kruschinki, and others whom favored his attention, however, the line between investigating and persecuting is a very fine one...and my dear people, by no means were my intentions meant to persecute anyone during those times, nor are they meant to persecute anyone today with all of this rhetoric about Endogyn. Today, as in the other episodes dealing with Endogyn, I will deliver my points with facts, and tell the truth of these issues by using peoples own words, and I do this to bring to you information that I think will protect you from making decisions that are NOT in your best interest!

I am of the opinion that all human beings have a built-in allergy to unpleasant or disturbing information, but unless we recognize that if we insulate ourselves from the realities of the world in which we live, the world of ARD, we will be kicked around, and bullwhipped, and damned! We easily become victim to “hearsay, rumor, gossip, unfounded information, unconfirmed reports, and false promises! We can easily fall prey to those who seek to benefit in both “financial” and “egotistical” ways by using methods that distract, delude, amuse, sidetrack and isolate us so that when they come in for the “kill,” we are non the wiser of the scam!
There are those who look at all of this “Endogyn banter” in shock and repulsed by it, and there are those who work at perpetrating it... and both may see a totally different picture of it all, but no matter the sides taken in these issues, for some, it is too late to make a difference!
If what I say about this depravity in Endogyn in the material I write is responsible, then I alone am responsible for the saying of it, but I've searched my conscience and I can't, for the life of me, find any justification for NOT bringing it to the attention of the public.

I also can accept that there are, on every story, two equal and logical sides to an argument, and understanding the position those promoting Endogyn have put me in, causes me to produce hard facts backed by credible material in my attempts to protect more persons afflicted with “Adhesion Related Disorder” from coming into harm by seeking a surgery at Endogyn by means that they might otherwise think are credible!
The line between investigating and persecuting is a very fine one...however, I will not walk by fear of another’s words against me, I will not keep silent because the subject is “unpopular & uncomfortable” for some, I will not speak words that only seek approval from others, and never question or challenge, because I do not fear to write, to associate, to question or to challenge, nor do I fear being “questioned” & “challenged,” when it comes to defend the causes of persons afflicted with “Adhesion Related Disorder.” To be “silent” only serves to give considerable comfort to those who perpetrate crimes against other, thus when I see an injustice, I will not remain silent!
I may have been instrumental in the beginning for promoting Endogyn, however, when the reality of the situations there became evident to me, I immediately made them public and did my best to expose the truth, but even in that attempt to save others from the dishonesty and harm that was going on at Endogyn, I cannot escape responsibility for the results.

The material you are about to read is NOT what I THINK it to be, but what I KNOW it to be!

The more the subject of, “The Hypoxic Side Effects of Carbon Dioxide by Gasless Laparoscope’s,” is researched by me, the more it appears that all of us were deceived by information and claims made by Daniel Kruschinski, Karen Steward, & Helen Dynda, among others, about the hypoxic side effects of carbon dioxide by gasless laparoscopy! Other information presented by them, is bogus as well, and I will stand by my words unless it can be shown otherwise!

Though this “exposure” of facts might be to late for many who went to Endogyn because they believed the words of these people, it is still better late, then not at all! For all who are either, NOT “well” from the experience, or “worse” for the experience, and in a number of cases, financially harmed by one or more return trips to Endogyn because they “trusted another surgeon in hopes of securing desperately need medical intervention for ARD,” I am so sorry. “May God Bless you!”

For all who perpetrated this deception against your own group of people, “May God Be Kind to You,” when you face him, if you face him, in the mean time, I hope you lose sleep knowing that you led many to additional injury at Endogyn because of your selfishness and egotistical goals in life! I will state that I do not think that Daniel created this situation he finds himself in today, (all of this hype about him and his 100% miracle procedures,) I am of the opinion that some of his patients simply felt that because someone they knew got better from his surgery, they were wanting of that for everyone, One big problem there though, was they wanted that so bad that when others did not get well, they turned to unscrupulous means to harvest patients to Daniel, who merely exploited it and rather successfully.
I will be showing you, through the posts of persons making what appear to be “unsubstantiated” claims about the “benefits” to patients having abdominal/pelvic surgery at Endogyn with the “Abdolift.” The posts you are about to read, are only a fraction of such posts making claims for "research" and "stats" regarding the "benefits" of "gasless" surgery.)

Suggestion:
If you go into one of the URL’s to find information related to "Gasless surgery"
use your PC keyboard as follows to make your search easier:
* Simply click the keys "Ctrl " and "F"
* At the same time and a box will appear for you to type in the word "gasless."
* This maneuver will automatically highlight where every word, " gasless" is mentioned
within the article.
* You can do this with ANY word on Any page you bring up in your computers!!

Next related post: http://ihrt.blogspot.com/2011/08/endogate-papers-endogyn-kruschinski.html

Dr Kruschisnki Endogyn New Crack House

Look out Stuggart!

What the heck is Kruschinski doing here?

Well it looks like he found himself a new cooperation with Crack House Herzog Karl Klinik!

Looky here

http://www.herzog-karl-klinik.de/gynaekologie/index.htm

Hutter must be hiding him for a bit...almost 500 km away from where he is suspose to be...hmmmmmm....

The truth about Gas less laparoscopy and Dr. Kruschinski

The truth about Gas less laparoscopy and Dr. Kruschinski
Translation from German to English by Babelfish

“gasless” Laparoskopie

Gas lots Laparoskopie is (was) a special form of the Laparoskopie, with which one can operate without the expensive special instruments without body cut (could). The method requires (e) less exercise and fate than genuine endoscopic operating.

(The following text is co-ordinated with the president of the working group gynäkologische Endoskopie of the German society for Gynäkologie and birth assistance).

“Gas lots “Laparoskopie = spatial air Laparoskopie

This method finds in our region still isolates application. We are addressed on that occasionally by female patients.

The so-called “Lapro elevator” was developed at the beginning of the 90's of Jörg saucy stone (Austria, at that time upper physician at the University of Ulm). Saucy stone does not use the technology today any longer.

The manufacturer, the company STORZ in Tuttlingen, took the Lapro elevator in the year 2006 again from the market.

This concerns a simple variant of the Laparoskopie, which obtained attention for the first time in the 90's in Germany, however contrary to the standard Laparoskopie neither in the subject surgery nor in the subject Gynäkologie to become generally accepted could.

The name expresses that with this technology no medical CO2-Gas is introduced into the abdominal cavity around the abdominal cavity to unfold and place for the operational interference to create. Instead after opening of the abdominal cavity at the navel a handle is introduced and the abdominal wall is pulled up. It flows normal air with room temperature into the abdominal cavity. Air is definitv a gas. Thus the question arises whether the term is not unfortunately selected and/or misleading.

In the work community Gynäkologi Endoskopie of the German society for Gynäkologie and birth assistance (AGE) is therefore alternatively the term “spatial air Laparoskopie” common (Professor Leo De Wilde, Oldenburg, president of the AGE.)

If air arrives over open veins with an operation into the Blutkreislauf, it causes clearly more easily a lethal Embolie than CO2, which ent always as product of the respiration in low concentration in the blood and can over the lung be abgeatmet. Also from the abdominal cavity air is only very slowly eliminated by the organism, which is less important however.

Why thus at all “gas lots Laparoskopie”

Around to understand one must develop little conception gift as a layman: With the standard Laparoskopie must be worked against to escaping the Aufdehnungsmediums with valves, so that the development of the abdominal cavity remains keeping upright. With the gasless technology one can save this expenditure. The raising of the abdominal wall guarantees the hook elevator by course at the navel. One can make and leave as many as desired and of any size holes open into the abdominal wall. Simple rubber cases replace expensive valve cases. One knows logical way any instruments of the open belly surgery by these openings would bring in. A hospital can here evt. much money save, because this equipment is usually already present. With the standard Laparoskopie cannot be done that. Instruments must be exactly co-ordinated with the valve cases. One needs expensive special instruments and this depending upon OI spectrum evt. in large number. Because of the cost advantages the gasless Laparoskopie is naturally in poorer countries likes.

For an operating surgeon trained in conventional surgery the conversion is not more simply, there it the handling of the delicate, different Laparoskopie instruments to learn must. To that extent the gasless Laparoskopie makes endoscopically ungeübten surgeon possible a simplified entrance into the Laparoskopie.

Also from view of the Anästhesisten (Narkoseärzte) it gives to laproskopieren reasons “gasless”. The renouncement of CO2-Gas and the proportioned positive pressure in the abdominal cavity has advantages for certain risk female patients, essentially older humans. They can be endoscopically operated if necessary without body cut, although a standard Laparoskopie for them would not be possible.

Problems:

One wants the clearly rougher conventional instruments and staunching of bleeding methods (Tupfer!) uses, needs one clearly larger wounds in the abdominal wall. The cosmetic result is then accordingly more unfavorable. The wound in the navel region must offer place not only for the hook elevator mechanism but also for the optics system. The necessary Wunddurchmesser amounts to about 20 mm. (Standard Laparoskopie to the comparison 5 - 11 mm.)

The effectiveness of the belly development is more unfavorable, than with the CO2-Laparoskopie, since the rise takes place only at one point. The result is a conical figure with the highest point at the navel. The operating surgeon needs most place however within the basin range. That succeeds with the even Aufdehnung with exactly proportioned CO2-Gasdruck more effectively. This is for us a operation-technically important point. The punctual pressure is not favorable on the fabric by the hook construction with long operations. The rough elevator construction is natural the operating surgeon and the assistant when operating in the way.

The spatial air cannot be warmed up. It prevails during the “gasless” OI in the abdominal cavity a lower temperature than with the CO2-Laparoskopie with body-warm gas (for this special devices are available.) The sinking of the fabric temperature has some important unfavorable metabolic effects (see below).

Our result: The “gasless” spatial air Laparoskopie takes a central position between body cut and belly reflection for us. It has elements of both.

Naturally a OI team equipped well for the standard Laproskopie could use its fine instruments also by gasless spatial air Laparoskopie. Then at least the wounds would be in the abdominal wall alike. Also those captivatingly precise Microchirurgie with miniaturized equipment under strong picture enlargement would be realizable. Disadvantages remained the worse development of the abdominal cavity and the missing possibility of the heating up of the belly by the warm gas. Waste of the Körpertemperatur changed among other things the Pharmakokinetik, increases the Sauerstoffverbrauch by cooling trembling, strengthens subjective measurement feeling, worsens the immune defense, increases the muscle strain (and with it the pain feeling). The blood clotting is affected unfavorably. (Literature: Gabriele Depenbusch: Be called hints against cool cases - Perioperative heat measures for patients still more effectively used. Intensively 2002; 10:165 - 174 George Thieme publishing house)

We decided in the OPZ Hürth so far against the introduction of the spatial air Laparoskopie with the elevator technology. We would see the sense of the procedure only with completely special female patients, whom we cannot operate usually ambulatory, to e.g. older humans.


Wrong conceptions to the “gasless” spatial air Laparoskopie

The gasless Laparoskopie does not permit more precise operating.

The production of the entrance to the abdominal cavity effected with the gasless Laparoskopie on less dangerous art. one does not have to dot the abdominal cavity for the execution of a CO2-Laparoskopie not “blindly” with a Kanüle and not to also in-sting the Trokarhülsen “blindly”. One can use problem-free the “open” technology and manufacture the entrance under view. (Literature A. Maucher (1990), open Laparoskopie. gynäkol prax 14, 741-746, Hans Marseille publishing house Munich) S. also for this the chapter “open Laparoskopie” on this homepage. The entrance technology furthest common with distance is however the “Blindpunktion)
The OI times are not shorter. Patients do not recover faster. The pain after the interference is not smaller. The medicine need is not smaller.
The results of the operations are better in no aspect, than with the CO2-Laparoskopie. The resulting scars are not cosmetically more favorably but clearly larger.
„The gasless “Laparoskopie does not permit operational treatment, which one can realize not with the standard Laparoskopie. (Also the standard Laparoskopie permits surgical sewing, even with micro-surgical seam material under up to twenty-way picture enlargement).

The “gasless Laparoskopie” does not accompany with a lower total complication risk. The Embolie and Thromboserate are not lower. The Narkosetechnik differs not from the normal Laparoskopie.

http://www.opz-huerth.de/index.php?menue=m3_&sm=21  

Gaslose Laparoskopie ist (war) eine Sonderform der Laparoskopie, bei der man ohne die teueren Spezialinstrumente ohne Leibschnitt operieren kann (konnte). Die Methode erfordert (e) weniger Übung und Geschick als echtes endoskopisches Operieren.

(Der nachfolgende Text ist mit dem Präsidenten der Arbeitsgemeinschaft gynäkologische Endoskopie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe abgestimmt).

"Gaslose“ Laparoskopie = Raumluft-Laparoskopie

Diese Methode findet in unserer Region noch vereinzelt Anwendung. Wir werden gelegentlich von Patientinnen hierauf angesprochen.

Entwickelt wurde der sog. "Lapro-Lift" zu Beginn der 90er Jahre von Jörg Keckstein (Österreich, seinerzeit Oberarzt an der Universität Ulm). Keckstein selbst verwendet die Technik heute nicht mehr.

Der Hersteller, die Firma STORZ in Tuttlingen, hat den Lapro-Lift im Jahre 2006 wieder vom Markt genommen.

Es handelt sich um eine einfache Variante der Laparoskopie, die in den 90er Jahren in Deutschland erstmals Aufmerksamkeit erzielte, sich aber im Gegensatz zur Standard-Laparoskopie weder im Fach Chirurgie noch im Fach Gynäkologie durchsetzen konnte.

Der Name bringt zum Ausdruck, dass bei dieser Technik kein medizinisches CO2-Gas in die Bauchhöhle eingeführt wird um die Bauchhöhle zu entfalten und Platz für den operativen Eingriff zu schaffen. Statt dessen wird nach Eröffnung der Bauchhöhle am Nabel ein Bügel eingeführt und die Bauchwand hochgezogen. Es strömt normale Luft mit Zimmertemperatur in den Bauchraum. Luft ist definitv ein Gas. Es stellt sich also die Frage, ob der Begriff nicht unglücklich gewählt bzw. irreführend ist.
In der Arbeitgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Endoskopie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (AGE) ist deswegen alternativ der Begriff "Raumluft-Laparoskopie" gebräuchlich (Prof. Leo De Wilde, Oldenburg, Präsident der AGE.)

Wenn Luft über offene Adern bei einer Operation in den Blutkreislauf gelangt, verursacht sie deutlich leichter eine lebensgefährliche Embolie als CO2, das als Produkt der Atmung immer in niedriger Konzentration im Blut anwesend ist und über die Lunge abgeatmet werden kann. Auch aus dem Bauchraum wird Luft vom Organismus nur sehr langsam eliminiert, was aber weniger wichtig ist.

Warum also überhaupt "Gaslose Laparoskopie"

Um das zu verstehen muss man als Laie ein wenig Vorstellungsgabe entwickeln: Bei der Standard-Laparoskopie muss mit Ventilen einem Entweichen des Aufdehnungsmediums entgegengewirkt werden, damit die Entfaltung des Bauchraumes aufrecht erhalten bleibt. Bei der gaslosen Technik kann man sich diesen Aufwand ersparen. Das Anheben der Bauchdecke stellt der Haken-Lift durch Zug am Nabel sicher. Man kann beliebig viele und beliebig große Löcher in die Bauchdecke machen und offen lassen. Einfache Gummihülsen ersetzen teure Ventilhülsen. Logischerweise kann man jegliche Instrumente der offenen Bauch-Chirurgie durch diese Öffnungen einführen. Eine Klinik kann hier evt. viel Geld sparen, weil dieses Instrumentarium in der Regel bereits vorhanden ist. Bei der Standard-Laparoskopie geht das nicht. Instrumente müssen genau auf die Ventilhülsen abgestimmt sein. Man braucht teure Spezialinstrumente und dies je nach OP-Spektrum evt. in großer Zahl. Wegen der Kostenvorteile ist die gaslose Laparoskopie natürlich in ärmeren Ländern beliebt.

Für einen in konventioneller Chirurgie ausgebildeten Operateur ist die Umstellung einfacher, da er nicht die Handhabung der zierlichen, andersartigen Laparoskopie-Instrumente erlernen muss. Insofern ermöglicht die gaslose Laparoskopie endoskopisch ungeübten Chirurgen einen vereinfachten Einstieg in die Laparoskopie.

Auch aus Sicht der Anästhesisten (Narkoseärzte) gibt es Gründe "gaslos" zu laproskopieren. Der Verzicht auf CO2-Gas und den dosierten Überdruck im Bauchraum hat Vorteile für bestimmte Risiko-Patientinnen, im wesentlichen ältere Menschen. Sie können ggf. ohne Leibschnitt endoskopisch operiert werden, obwohl eine Standard-Laparoskopie für sie nicht möglich wäre.

Probleme:

Will man die deutlich gröberen konventionellen Instrumente und Blutstillungsmethoden (Tupfer!) einsetzen, benötigt man deutlich größere Wunden in der Bauchdecke. Das kosmetische Ergebnis ist dann entsprechend ungünstiger. Die Wunde in der Nabelregion muss Platz nicht nur für die Haken-Lift Einrichtung sondern auch für das Optiksystem bieten. Der erforderliche Wunddurchmesser beträgt etwa 20 mm. (Standard-Laparoskopie zum Vergleich 5 - 11 mm.)
Die Effektivität der Bauchentfaltung ist ungünstiger, als bei der CO2-Laparoskopie, da die Anhebung nur an einem Punkt erfolgt. Das Ergebnis ist eine kegelförmige Figur mit dem höchsten Punkt am Nabel. Der Operateur benötigt den meisten Platz aber im Beckenbereich. Das gelingt bei der gleichmäßigen Aufdehnung mit genau dosiertem CO2-Gasdruck effektiver. Dies ist für uns ein operationstechnisch wichtiger Punkt. Nicht günstig ist bei langen Operationen der punktuelle Druck auf das Gewebe durch die Hakenkonstruktion. Die grobe Lift-Konstruktion ist dem Operateur und den Assistenten natürlich bei Operieren im Weg.
Die Raumluft kann nicht angewärmt werden. Es herrscht während der "gaslosen" OP im Bauchraum eine niedrigere Temperatur als bei der CO2-Laparoskopie mit körperwarmem Gas (hierfür stehen spezielle Geräte zur Verfügung.) Die Absenkung der Gewebetemperatur hat einige wichtige nachteilige Stoffwechseleffekte (s. u. ).


Unser Fazit: Die "gaslose" Raumluft-Laparoskopie nimmt für uns eine Mittelstellung zwischen Leibschnitt und Bauchspiegelung ein. Sie hat Elemente von beiden.


Natürlich könnte ein für die Standard-Laproskopie gut ausgerüstetes OP-Team seine feinen Instrumente auch per gasloser Raumluft-Laparoskopie einsetzen. Dann wären zumindest die Wunden in der Bauchdecke gleich. Auch die bestechend präzise Microchirurgie mit miniaturisiertem Instrumentarium unter starker Bildvergrößerung wäre realisierbar. Nachteile blieben die schlechtere Entfaltung des Bauchraumes und die fehlende Möglichkeit der Erwärmung des Bauches durch das warme Gas. Abfall der Körpertemperatur verändert u. a. die Pharmakokinetik, erhöht den Sauerstoffverbrauch durch Kältezittern, verstärkt subjektives Missempfinden, verschlechtert die Immunabwehr, erhöht die Muskelanspannung (und damit das Schmerzempfinden). Die Blutgerinnung wird ungünstig beeinflusst. (Literatur: Gabriele Depenbusch: Heiße Tips gegen coole Fälle - Perioperative Wärmemassnahmen für Patienten noch effektiver eingesetzt. Intensiv 2002; 10: 165-174 Georg Thieme Verlag)

Wir haben uns im OPZ-Hürth bisher gegen die Einführung der Raumluft-Laparoskopie mit der Lift-Technik entschieden. Wir sähen den Sinn des Verfahrens nur bei ganz speziellen Patientinnen, die wir meist nicht ambulant operieren können, z. B. älteren Menschen.


Falsche Vorstellungen zur "gaslosen" Raumluft-Laparoskopie


Die gaslose Laparoskopie erlaubt kein präziseres Operieren. .
Die Herstellung des Zugangs zur Bauchhöhle erfolgt bei der gaslosen Laparoskopie nicht auf eine weniger gefährliche Art. Man muss zur Durchführung einer CO2-Laparoskopie nicht die Bauchhöhle "blind" mit einer Kanüle punktieren und die Trokarhülsen auch nicht "blind" einstechen. Man kann problemlos die "offene" Technik einsetzen und den Zugang unter Sicht herstellen. (Literatur A. Maucher (1990), Offene Laparoskopie. gynäkol prax 14, 741-746, Hans Marseille Verlag München)s. hierzu auch das Kapitel "offene Laparoskopie" auf dieser Homepage. Die mit Abstand am weitesten verbreitete Zugangstechnik ist allerdings die "Blindpunktion)
Die OP-Zeiten sind nicht kürzer. Patienten erholen sich nicht schneller. Die Schmerzen nach dem Eingriff sind nicht geringer. Der Medikamentenbedarf ist nicht geringer.
Die Ergebnisse der Operationen sind in keinem Aspekt besser, als bei der CO2-Laparoskopie . Die resultierenden Narben sind nicht kosmetisch günstiger sondern deutlich größer.
Die „gaslose“ Laparoskopie erlaubt keine operative Behandlung, die man nicht mit der Standard-Laparoskopie realisieren kann. (Auch die Standard-Laparoskopie erlaubt chirurgisches Nähen, sogar mit mikrochirurgischem Nahtmaterial unter bis zu 20-facher Bildvergrößerung).
Die "gaslose Laparoskopie" geht nicht einher mit einem niedrigeren Gesamt-Komplikationsrisiko. Die Embolie- und Thromboserate ist nicht niedriger. Die Narkosetechnik unterscheidet sich nicht von der normalen Laparoskopie.

If this really was the way to have an adhesiolysis then all the world would be clammoring at Kruschinskis door! All he has is "advertising" and no hard facts about his claims. The Endogyn "parrots", those endeared to Kruschinski are common lay people who will happily explain TO ANYONE WHO WILL LISTEN about the deletirious side effects of carbon dioxide and reel in another sucker to a very questionable surgery.
See the skeptisism in the forum below....first translated to English then in the originional German.

It is a far cry from what Karen Steward of Texas espouses!

Babelfish translation from German to English

Dr kurschinskie, EndyGyn = Risko growing together smaller
becci mouse
Mo, 07/06/2010 - 14:14hello it love,

since the contribution is already somewhat older, I open from there new post office and would like to ask, who already made thereby experiences, who there was in practice. with you actually fewer growing together, did you did develop have make again to let a OI? did someone use the possibility without full arcose to be operated???

since practice is far for many away, depending upon residence, I would know also gladly, how the contact came to conditions, how discussions ran, reliably by telephone/mail I take to? is one at all well advised and examined, if one only one day before the OI travels? can local physicians which with found at all begin or do have one to re-examinations again and again? for me some hundreds km, if I carry then however fewer growing together off and I have the chance, would be to be healed, take I gladly in purchase… from there completely urgently please to communicate to me many tips and experiences completely. sone fear of the OI has and is already correctly depressive, because I in the Internet horrogeschichten myself and risks read and see only black: (

and the latter asks: how did it run off with the assumption of the costs? I am private, but white not whether soetwas one takes over, if one drives etc. into another place.

are strained and wait longingly for answer, lg becci

To write announcing or registering around comments



Hello becci, I has

DanH

Mo, 07/06/2010 - 18:59Hello becci,


I read not all your contributions, therefore I do not know your diagnosis/complaints.

Would like to mean you however (even if only volatile) impression of Dr. Kruschinski to describe. I had times at the telephone. It was before the diagnosis Endo, at that time a general physician the suspicion also growing together and possibly “which gynäkologisches”… and with to be googled is I evenly over it had tripped and have nen date made the telephone consulting hour. My impression was not the best one: We talked no 10 min, I to it completely scarcely my complaints and the suspicion let us describe and already had I nen OI date. I found that in such a way… naja. And the cash hätt's anyway not paid.

He works with this elevator method, as you writes without gas. And as growing together barrier it works with a kind spraying gel which I from otherwise no hospital knows (clearly, he has probably a patent drauf). (IHRT ~ Nah thats just what he wants you to think)

But is ob's good or bad.??? Does someone know relevant studies? I do not know so quite, but wenns the miracle drug against growing together would give nevertheless, then we would not have nevertheless all, or? That is only my completely personal opinion, and I white that female patients by him were operated on it to swear.

Love of greetings

Daniela


To write announcing or registering around comments

Rear Becci, too doc

Erdbeere23

Mo, 07/06/2010 - 20:12Rear Becci,


too doc kruschinski gabs here already some discussions.

fact is: it is endometriosespezialist and still on NO advanced training or meeting about endometriose, also of endometrioseverband Germany, was seen none (to these meetings endometriosespezialisten, which train themselves further regularly, all go). alone to me would already signal to go there not.

besides it operates in a private hospital and describes on its homepage in my opinion fell so praising mark “which has I there again wonderful mad carried out” that I have the feeling, it goes over to be ego and, above all, around its money.

surely that sounds everything for someone, which hurts degrees has, in emergency feels, also psychologically possibly quite to ends is total (like most women, who look for nem endoarzt), like the rescue and super. BUT: on it the offer aims exactly, aims the way of the advertisement off! it is made, because in this way women, who are weak degrees, an alleged rescue anchor been enough and in addition properly into the bag reached. (IHRT ~ this really hits the nail on the head huh)

I würd there never probably go ...... to decide must that everyone. in a phase, where I was in emergency, I times contact there had, and even said, if I pay the OI and come, me as free achievement (further LOCK means) the preliminary investigation is given to me.

besides several said to me spezis the fact that my small endometrioseherde with the elevator method does not see and thus no comprehensive view can get (also different one spezis to work with elevator, but not at endo…). And: The complaints (muscular strain etc.) are also not better after that elevators than according to the method with gas.

I go rather to one endospezi, which is exactly specialized in endo, continues to form and to growing together one prevents also there.

LG


To write announcing or registering around comments

I must agree you

DanH

Mo, 07/06/2010 - 20:16I must agree you strawberry.

Wenn's around Endometriose does not go is it already times at all the correct partner!!!! I thought it went around growing together.

To write announcing or registering around comments

I do not know the physician,

EndotanteIV

Di, 08/06/2010 - 09:05
I do not know the physician, but I can only say, I am condemned glad, which was invented the full arcose! Never voluntarily I would like life received by this OP´s somewhat! Before the anaesthesias have I meanwhile no more fear… And I am gone until one year ago only under obligation to the blood removing…

LG Daniela



To write announcing or registering around comments

hello daniela, with me goes

becci mouse

Di, 08/06/2010 - 14:49hello daniela,


with me it concerns the suspicion on endometriose. large fear has before intervened, first OI in full arcose and before the diagnosis, the risks of renewed growing together etc.

I found its homepage also not good in the first moment very and in my emergency know I, I whom was to believe, has already grant investigated, to each physician says something else, it gives those, which swear on the gasless and those, which gives preference to the classical method, gives it. report and opinions are only unfortunately always very on one side and each speaker make evenly only the contrary operation method totally bad, everything sound plausible and also widerum not.

me can someone help, has someone possibly well-founded studies or per/versus arguments for me? are already again drauf and to call off the OI: (

lg becci


To write announcing or registering around comments

hello strawberry, you has completely

becci mouse

Di, 08/06/2010 - 15:00hello strawberry,

you have quite right with yours state: I despaired to degrees totally weakly, fearfully, panisch…: (

from where does one know that he was so far on no such studies and advanced training? how did you have contact to the hospital, by telephone?

relative this sprays: as it on the homepage is praised, is it the growing together means absolutely, in America is that course and give. I found that very logical everything, since the liquid, which is used with the classical OI method, remains clinging not on the wounds like this spray. there it, the scars meant were less with the gasless OI, belly cuts can be avoided. then is talks there about second look, thus a control OI, in the growing together, which grant themselves within 3 after the first OI form, to be solved can… and and… then with the regioanlanästhesie, has nevertheless such fear of a full arcose…

white further, today unfortunately a very short discussion by telephone with my COMPANY spoke, and this meant also that with the gasless OI less precise herd be found can, which is risks the same growing together also occur can… must one know that she transferred me to Dr. Ebert, therefore her surely not completely different physician then would particularly praise (to make we us anything forwards, ALL physicians do not want to earn, then unfortunately is that)

if jnd still more has information, opinions or experiences, please to write the text completely urgently here, are so down: (


lg


To write announcing or registering around comments

Dr. Kruschinski

Schnecke83

Di, 08/06/2010 - 16:07Hello together,

only once I would like to say that everyone of the OI method must be convinced, it must let which be issued over itself!


If that is not the case, I would always call a OI off.


One must with itself in pure ones to be, because with the result, no matter how it goes out, one must to live be able.

Now to Dr. Kruschinski:

Is interesting, as much bad criticism it must put in and over it is written, although degrees those were never operated by it… (IHRT ~ Ummm I was)

I was operated one week ago by him! Head OI and some days after Second look.

Z.Zt. still am I in the hospital. After both interferences I knew immediately which thing am, have some pictures received, so that I knew exactly, what it there with me down “employed” have!

In a KH I would have gotten a belly cut, would have been said at that time me with the first BSP. I did not want to have these with nearly 27 years however, therefore I had decided against it. Now I lasted a breath of larger cuts as with normal EX. my considerations and research up to OI having a half year!

And why it to recruit must: It operates in a private hospital! There everyone can go without a transfer, says I now times so casually. And it must constantly fight for it and justify itself for its method. Is that fair? Or is it envy of the others? (IHRT ~ haw haw haw haw)

The SprayShield I got also, over experiences can I naturally only think I in some weeks for speaking and like it with the pain look!

I learned it to know now personally and from there can I now a judgement afford!

Which all patients say are: It seems to be always on the escape…

But: It is each day in the hospital, answers even at Easter and at night to my emails!!!

He says even it is its appointment and gives everything for it… from there suffers badly his family life under it. ( IHRT, This is the understatement of the century!)

Now, I know for me, if further OPs lines up, I will come always ago. My travel time: approx. 4 autohours

And I am not private, but the BKK health takes over the costs. Only the gel and the remainder of the stay one must pay.

To further questions simply announce



Love of greetings



To write announcing or registering around comments

Hello becci, I became

DanH

Di, 08/06/2010 - 16:09Hello becci,


I would never go with a Endomoetrioseverdacht to him! Simply so from the feeling. In no technical periodical, on no congress of the Endovereinigung or hears one reads something of him in connection with Endo. With Endometriose you belong into the hands species! And Kruschinski is in my opinion only self-appointed which growing together bellies concerns.

Here times a beautiful text to the gasless Lap: http://www.opz-huerth.de/index.php?menue=m3_&sm=21

I had heard of it already, also of many disadvantages, and that I now found. How in the text by the way descriptive is developed by saucy stone - > and no more does not use! That says some nevertheless already…

LG

Daniela


To write announcing or registering around comments

Left thank you

nela

So, 13/06/2010 - 16:42 Hello Daniela, thank you for the left and your open comment! I find it very courageous by you that you take here so openly position. I reacted it experienced as it to criticism. It feels asked already insulting if it for it we whether it at all a practice has. Also I go actually proving only to a physician to that me can in appropriate advanced training measures have participated, and/or in technical periodicals is represented. Which does not concern Schneck83 so would like I anybody too close to step however one could nearly believe that this is a kind advertisement. Which Doc omits itself already with a female patient over its family life. It should nevertheless the patient and not around the physician concern here. In addition which many bad criticisms? Criticism at it nevertheless nearly not only always exists these miracle stories. Endo is a hard fate and no place for physicians, who are already insulting if her are not praised.

LG Nela

To write announcing or registering around comments

Hello Nela that with its

Schnecke83

So, 13/06/2010 - 18:24Hello Nela,



that with its family life does not have it me also told, I “snapped open” in the hospital only!



It changed with me no private word, everything had with me to do, thus for the patient.


Greetings

To write announcing or registering around comments

Hello Schnecke83, are you

DanH

So, 13/06/2010 - 18:38Hello Schnecke83,


were you operated by Dr. Kruschinski because of Enometriose?

LG
Daniela

To write announcing or registering around comments

Hello Daniela, I has

Schnecke83

So, 13/06/2010 - 19:03Hello Daniela,


yes, I have Endo degree of 3 with strong growing together and an inclination to the Zystenbildung at the ovaries.

My was already again 8 cm large: - (

Between intestine and the Gebärmutter I have still Endo, which he has however for the time being leaves, there it a piece intestine to remove would have had and then get one an artificial intestine exit for 3 months, so that the two intestine ends can grow together.

Oh, always these OI `s, as good that one does not have white how often one still so in its life therefore under measurers.

LG

Origional German text

http://www.endometriose-liga.eu/node/26625

Dr kurschinskie, EndyGyn = Risko Verwachsungen geringer
becci-maus
Mo, 07/06/2010 - 14:14hallo ihr lieben,

habe soeben in einem älteren beitrag von dr kurschinski in braunschweig gelesen und bin total geschockt, aufgeregt und erfreut. habe mir sogleich dann seine homepage angeguckt und dort von seinen neuartigen op-techniken gelesen, die die risiken von verwachsungen eindämmen sollen, auch wird gaslos operiert, was insg auch weniger risiken birgt, außerdem gibt es dort auch die möglichkeit, ohne vollnarkose diesen eingriff vornehmen zu lassen, was mich total neugierg macht. denn ich habe schreckliche angst vor meinem op termin in berlin und würd am liebste absagen, wenn ich über die risiken lese und auch hier im forum wird deutlich, dass immer wieder verwachsungen über die jahre entstehen, die sicher nicht durch die endo, sondern durch BS / oder Bschnitte entstanden sind.

da der beitrag schon etwas älter ist, mache ich daher einen neuen post auf und möchte fragen, wer damit schon erfahrungen gemacht hat, wer dort war in der praxis. sind bei euch tatsächlich weniger verwachsungen entstanden, musstet ihr erneut eine op machen lassen? hat jemand die möglichkeit genutzt, ohne vollnarkose operiert zu werden???

da die praxis ja für viele weit weg ist, je nach wohnort, würde ich auch gerne wissen, wie der kontakt zu stande kam, wie besprechungen verliefen, sicher per telefon/mail nehme ich am? wird man überhaupt gut beraten und untersucht, wenn man erst einen tag vor der op anreist? können hiesige ärzte was mit den befunden überhaupt anfangen oder muss man zu nachuntersuchungen immer wieder hin? für mich wären das einige hunderte km, wenn ich dann aber weniger verwachsungen davontrage und ich die chance habe, geheilt zu werden, nehme ich das gerne in kauf...daher ganz dringend die bitte, mir ganz viele tips und erfahrungen mitzuteilen. habe sone angst vor der op und bin schon richtig depressiv, weil ich mir im internet horrogeschichten und risiken durchlese und nur noch schwarz sehe :(

und die letzte frage: wie lief es denn mit der kostenübernahme ab? ich bin privatversichert, aber weiß nicht, ob soetwas übernommen wird, wenn man in einen anderen ort fährt etc.

bin gespannt und warte sehnsüchtig auf antwort, lg becci



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben

Hallo becci, ich habe
DanH
Mo, 07/06/2010 - 18:59Hallo becci,

ich habe nicht alle deine Beiträge gelesen, also kenne ich deine Diagnose/Beschwerden nicht.

Möchte dir aber meinen (wenn auch nur flüchtigen) Eindruck von Dr. Kruschinski schildern. Ich hatte den mal am Telefon. Es war vor der Diagnose Endo, damals hatte ein Allgemeinmediziner den Verdacht auch Verwachsungen und evtl. "was gynäkologisches"...und beim googeln bin ich eben über ihn gestolpert und hab nen Termin zur Telefonsprechstunde gemacht. Mein Eindruck war nicht der Beste: Wir haben keine 10 min geredet, ich hab ihm ganz knapp meine Beschwerden und den Verdacht geschildert und schon hatte ich nen OP-Termin. Das fand ich so...naja. Und die Kasse hätt's ohnehin nicht gezahlt.

Er arbeitet ja mit dieser Lift-Methode, wie du schreibst ohne Gas. Und als Verwachsungsbarriere arbeitet er mit einer Art Sprühgel was ich aus sonst keiner Klinik kenne (klar, er hat wohl auch ein Patent drauf).

Aber ob's gut oder schlecht ist..??? Kennt jemand relevante Studien? Ich weiß nicht so recht, aber wenns doch DAS Wundermittel gegen Verwachsungen geben würde, dann hätten wir doch alle keine, oder? Das ist nur meine ganz persönliche Meinung, und ich weiß das Patientinnen die von ihm operiert wurden darauf schwören.



Liebe Grüße

Daniela



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
Hi Becci, zu doc
Erdbeere23
Mo, 07/06/2010 - 20:12Hi Becci,



zu doc kruschinski gabs hier schon einige diskussionen..

fakt ist: er ist kein endometriosespezialist und wurde noch auf KEINER fortbildung oder veranstaltung zum thema endometriose, auch vom endometrioseverband deutschland, gesehen (zu diesen veranstaltungen gehen endometriosespezialisten, die sich regelmäßig fortbilden, alle hin). das allein würde mir schon signalisieren, da nicht hin zu gehen.

zudem operiert er in einer privatklinik und schildert auf seine homepage meiner meinung nach die fälle so selbstlobend marke "was hab ich da wieder wundervolles tolles geleistet", dass ich das gefühl habe, es geht um sein ego und, vor allem, um sein geld.

sicherlich klingt das alles für jemanden, der grad schmerzen hat, sich in not fühlt, auch psychisch evtl ziemlich am ende ist (wie die meisten frauen, die nach nem endoarzt suchen), wie die rettung und total super. ABER: genau darauf zielt das angebot, zielt die art und weise der werbung ab! sie ist gemacht, weil auf diese weise frauen, die grad schwach sind, ein vermeintlicher rettungsanker gereicht wird- und dazu ordentlich in die tasche gegriffen.

ich würd da niemals hingehen......entscheiden muss das wohl jeder selber. in einer phase, wo ich in not war, hab ich da mal kontakt hin gehabt, und mir wurde sogar gesagt, wenn ich die op zahle und komme, wird mir als gratisleistung (weiteres lockmittel) die voruntersuchung geschenkt.

zudem haben mir mehrere spezis gesagt, dass mein kleine endometrioseherde mit der liftmethode NICHT sieht und somit keinen umfassenden einblick bekommen kann (auch andere spezis arbeiten mit lift, aber nicht bei endo...). Und: Die beschwerden (muskelkater usw) sind nach dem liften auch nicht besser als nach der methode mit gas..

ich geh lieber zu einem endospezi, der auf endo genau spezialisiert ist, sich weiter bildet und auch dort wird verwachsungen vorgebeugt..

LG



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
Ich muss dir zustimmen
DanH
Mo, 07/06/2010 - 20:16Ich muss dir zustimmen Erdbeere.

Wenn's um Endometriose geht ist er schon mal gar nicht der richtige Ansprechpartner!!!! Ich dachte es ging um Verwachsungen.



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
Ich kenne den Arzt nicht,
EndotanteIV
Di, 08/06/2010 - 09:05

Ich kenne den Arzt nicht, aber ich kann nur sagen, ich bin verdammt froh, das die Vollnarkose erfunden wurde! Niemals freiwillig möchte ich von diesen OP´s etwas life mitbekommen! Vor den Narkosen hab ich mittlerweile keine Angst mehr... Und ich bin bis vor einem Jahr nur unter Zwang zum Blutabnehmen gegangen...

LG Daniela

Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
hallo daniela, bei mir geht
becci-maus
Di, 08/06/2010 - 14:49hallo daniela,

bei mir geht es um den verdacht auf endometriose. habe ja große angst vor dem eingriff, erste op in vollnarkose und vor der diagnose, den risiken erneuter verwachsungen etc.

ich fand seine homepage im ersten moment sehr gut und in meiner not weiß ich auch nicht, wem ich glauben soll, habe bereits stunden recherchiert, jeder arzt sagt etwas anderes, es gibt die, die auf die gaslose schwören und es gibt die, die der klassischen methode den vorzug geben. nur leider sind die berichte und meinungen immer sehr einseitig und jeder sprecher macht eben nur die gegenteilige operationsmethode total schlecht, alles klingt einleuchtend und auch widerum nicht.

kann mir denn jemand weiterhelfen, hat jemand evtl fundierte studien oder pro/contra argumente für mich? bin schon wieder drauf und dran, die op abzusagen :(

lg becci



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
hallo erdbeere, du hast ganz
becci-maus
Di, 08/06/2010 - 15:00hallo erdbeere,

du hast ganz recht mit deiner aussage: ich bin grad total schwach, ängstlich, verzweifelt, panisch...:(

woher weiß man denn, dass er bisher auf keinen solchen studien und fortbildungen war? wie hattest du denn kontakt zu der klinik, per telefon?

bezüglich diesen sprays: so wie es auf der homepage gepriesen wird, ist es DAS verwachsungenmittel schlechthin, in amerika sei das gang und gebe. ich fand das alles sehr logisch, da die flüssigkeit, die bei der klassischen op-methode verwendet wird, nicht auf den wunden haften bleibt wie dieses spray. dort hieß es, die narben seien mit der gaslosen op weniger, bauchschnitte können vermieden werden. dann ist da die rede von dem second look, also einer kontroll-op, in der verwachsungen, die sich ja innerhalb 3 stunden nach der ersten op bilden, gelöst werden können...und und und... dann das mit der regioanlanästhesie, hab doch solche angst vor einer vollnarkose...

weiß nicht weiter, habe heute mit meiner FA gesprochen, leider ein sehr kurzes gespräch per telefon, und diese meinte auch, dass mit der gaslosen op weniger präzise herde gefunden werden können, die risiken die gleichen sind, verwachsungen auch auftreten können...aberdazumuss man wissen, dass sie mich zu dr. ebert überwiesen hat, also würde sie sicher nicht einen ganz anderen arzt dann besonders loben (denn machen wir uns nichts vor, ALLE ärzte wollen verdienen, so ist das leider)

wenn jnd noch mehr infos, meinungen oder erfahrungen hat, bitte ganz dringend hier texten, bin so down :(

lg



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
Dr. Kruschinski
Schnecke83
Di, 08/06/2010 - 16:07Hallo zusammen,

erst einmal möchte ich sagen, dass jeder von der OP Methode überzeugt sein muss, die er über sich ergehen lassen muss!

Wenn das nicht der Fall ist, würde ich eine OP immer absagen.

Man muss mit sich im Reinen sein, weil mit dem Ergebnis, egal wie es ausgeht, muss man leben können.



Nun zu Dr. Kruschinski:

Interessant ist, wie viel schlechte Kritik er einstecken muss und über ihn geschrieben wird, obwohl grade diejenigen nie von ihm operiert wurden...

Ich wurde vor einer Woche von ihm operiert! Haupt-OP und einige Tage danach Second look.

Z.Zt. befinde ich mich noch in der Klinik. Nach beiden Eingriffen wusste ich sofort Bescheid was Sache ist, habe etliche Bilder erhalten, so dass ich genau wusste, was er dort bei mir unten "angestellt" hat!

In einem KH hätte ich einen Bauchschnitt bekommen, wurde mir damals bei der ersten BSP gesagt. Diesen wollte ich mit fast 27 Jahren aber nicht haben, deshalb habe ich mich dagegen entschieden. Nun habe ich ein Hauch größerer Schnitte wie bei einer normalen BSP. Meine Überlegungen und Forschungen bis hin zu OP haben ein halbes Jahr gedauert!

Und warum er werben muss: Er operiert in einer Privatklinik! Dort kann jeder ohne eine Überweisung hin gehen, sage ich jetzt mal so salopp.. Und er muss ständig dafür kämpfen und sich für seine Methode rechtfertigen. Ist das fair? Oder ist es Neid von den Anderen?

Das SprayShield habe ich auch bekommen, über Erfahrungen kann ich natürlich erst denke ich in einigen Wochen sprechen und wie es mit den Schmerzen aussieht!

Ich habe ihn nun persönlich kennen gelernt und daher kann ich mir nun ein Urteil leisten!

Was alle Patienten sagen ist: Er scheint immer auf der Flucht zu sein...

Aber: Er ist jeden Tag in der Klinik, antwortet sogar an Ostern und nachts auf meine E-Mails!!!

Er sagt selbst es ist seine Berufung und gibt alles dafür...daher leidet arg sein Familienleben darunter.

Nun ja, ich für mich weiß, falls weitere OPs anstehen, werde ich immer her kommen. Meine Fahrzeit: ca. 4 Autostunden

Und ich bin nicht privatversichert, aber die BKK Gesundheit übernimmt die Kosten. Nur das Gel und den Rest des Aufenthaltes muss man selbst zahlen.

Bei weiteren Fragen einfach melden

Liebe Grüße



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
Hallo becci, ich würde
DanH
Di, 08/06/2010 - 16:09Hallo becci,

ich würde mit einem Endomoetrioseverdacht niemals zu ihm gehen! Einfach so vom Gefühl her. In keiner Fachzeitschrift, auf keinem Kongress der Endovereinigung liest oder hört man etwas von ihm im Zusammenhang mit Endo. Mit Endometriose gehörst du in die Hände eines Spezies! Und Kruschinski ist meiner Meinung nach nur ein selbsternannter was Verwachsungsbäuche angeht.

Hier mal ein schöner Text zur gaslosen Lap: http://www.opz-huerth.de/index.php?menue=m3_&sm=21

Ich hatte davon schon gehört, auch von vielen Nachteilen, und das hab ich nun gefunden. Wie im Text übrigens beschrieben ist von Keckstein entwickelt -> und nicht mehr verwendet! Das sagt doch schon einiges...

LG

Daniela



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
Link Vielen Dank
nela
So, 13/06/2010 - 16:42Hallo Daniela, vielen Dank für den Link und Deinen offenen Kommentar! Ich finde es sehr mutig von Dir, dass Du hier so offen Stellung beziehst. Ich habe es selbst erlebt wie er auf Kritik reagiert. Er fühlt sich schon beleidigt wenn er danach gefragt wir ob er überhaupt eine Praxis hat. Auch ich gehe nur zu einem Arzt der mir tatsächlich nachweisen kann an entsprechenden Fortbildungsmaßnahmen teilgenommen zu haben, bzw. in Fachzeitschriften vertreten ist. Was Schneck83 betrifft so möchte ich niemandem zu nahe treten aber man könnte fast glauben, dass dies eine Art Werbung ist. Welcher Doc lässt sich schon bei einer Patientin über sein Familienleben aus. Es sollte hier doch um den Kranken und nicht um den Arzt gehen. Außerdem welche viele schlechte Kritiken? Kritik an ihm existiert doch fast gar nicht bloß immer diese Wundergeschichten. Endo ist ein hartes Schicksal und kein Platz für Ärzte, die schon beleidigt sind wenn sie nicht gelobt werden.

LG Nela


Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
Hallo Nela, dass mit seinem
Schnecke83
So, 13/06/2010 - 18:24Hallo Nela,

dass mit seinem Familienleben hat er mir auch nicht erzählt, habe ich in der Klinik nur "aufgeschnappt"!

Er hat mit mir gar kein privates Wort gewechselt, alles hatte mit mir zu tun, also dem Patient.

Grüße



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
Hallo Schnecke83, bist du
DanH
So, 13/06/2010 - 18:38Hallo Schnecke83,

bist du von Dr. Kruschinski wegen Enometriose operiert worden?

LG

Daniela



Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
Hallo Daniela, ja, ich habe
Schnecke83
So, 13/06/2010 - 19:03Hallo Daniela,

ja, ich habe Endo Grad 3 mit starken Verwachsungen und eine Neigung zur Zystenbildung an den Eierstöcken.

Meine war schon wieder 8 cm groß :-(

Zwischen Darm und der Gebärmutter habe ich noch Endo, die hat er aber vorerst belassen, da er ein Stück Darm hätte entfernen müssen und dann bekommt man einen künstlichen Darmausgang für 3 Monate, damit die zwei Darmenden zusammen wachsen können.

Ach ja, immer diese OP`s, wie gut, dass man nicht weiß wie oft man noch so in seinem Leben deswegen unters Messer muss..

LG

If you need friends bad enough to hang with the likes of Dr Daniel Kruschisnki and Karen Steward than we pray God keep you safe through your ordeal. Wouldnt facebook be a safer bet?